The Daily You: How the New Advertising Industry Is Defining Your Identity and Your Worth/I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy/Privacy

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Information Ethics Pub Date : 2013-10-01 DOI:10.5860/choice.49-6375
Judy Anderson
{"title":"The Daily You: How the New Advertising Industry Is Defining Your Identity and Your Worth/I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy/Privacy","authors":"Judy Anderson","doi":"10.5860/choice.49-6375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Daily You: How the New Advertising Industry Is Defining Your Identity and Your Worth Joseph Turow. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011. 234. pp. $28.00I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy Lori Andrews. New York: Free Press, 2011. 253 pp. $26.00Privacy Garret Keizer. New York: Picador, 2012. 194 pp. $15.00Privacy is the bulwark of any free society. It seems like such a simple concept- letting people decide what information about themselves they want to make public-but what does it really entail? Today's political and commercial world is about collecting information about people. Every keystroke from tweets, every keystroke biometric measuring keyboarding pattern, every student accessing pages in online textbooks, is being recorded and logged for data retrieval for potential buyers. There are seemingly endless electronically linked storage sites that collect data on what information we search, what movies we prefer, where we like to vacation, what books we read, and the list goes on. Our society is developing a resigned acceptance of being under surveillance-both visual and audio-from any governmental authority, shopkeeper, or casual cell phone photographer. Coupled with that is a growing concern among some that we are losing the valued right to keep some information about ourselves confidential and to have control over how any personal information is used and distributed. The privacy issue is not new; it has been a topic in the courts for centuries. The difference today is the magnitude of the possibilities for invading a person's privacy and the range of uses, both positive and negative, for which that data is being used.Turow, Andrews, and Keizer have each taken an aspect of the complex world of privacy and shown the reader a web of positives and negatives that exist when the topic is closely examined. Turow's The Daily You takes the reader through a very detailed analysis of the world of advertising and how individual companies gather, package, and market information about you to any person or company willing to pay for that valued material. He covers the many clever ways data is collected as persons query Internet sites, tweet, and \"like\" items. Then he delves into the way consumer-centric insight is bought, sold, and used to the best marketing advantage to promote sales and attract people to particular websites and product lines. This may be viewed with both positive and negative eyes. On the positive, the more precise the data collected on users, the more likely they will have information that interests them displayed the next time they access the Internet. If they enjoy sports, for example, the content they see will more likely contain advertisements for sports events and equipment. On the negative, the data analyzers and artificial intelligent programs are screening the choices that will be displayed, causing a silo effect and censorship for the user. They will only view content and possibly only get special rewards coupons and deals that correspond to their current thinking and interests. This preselected display is based on what they have viewed, purchased, or searched for in the past. Tracking and targeting users is part of our digital landscape. Whether the information is collected and used only by a particular website, or the data is collected and brokered, the user must actively request that the information not be collected and used, a request that is not always honored. From a cultural viewpoint, Turow also points out the potential for creating privileged users, those who have a wide social following and allow their information to be packaged, foregoing privacy for perks. Their potential for passing information to a wide audience is valued. Those who have small social networks and want to protect their privacy are tagged as \"waste\" and leftout of promotional deals in marketing plans, creating an underclass of users. He provides detailed information on specific companies and how they gather the bits and bytes of our information and buying patterns without giving us compensation for that data or easy options to keep that personal information from being made public. …","PeriodicalId":39913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Ethics","volume":"22 1","pages":"163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-6375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Daily You: How the New Advertising Industry Is Defining Your Identity and Your Worth Joseph Turow. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011. 234. pp. $28.00I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy Lori Andrews. New York: Free Press, 2011. 253 pp. $26.00Privacy Garret Keizer. New York: Picador, 2012. 194 pp. $15.00Privacy is the bulwark of any free society. It seems like such a simple concept- letting people decide what information about themselves they want to make public-but what does it really entail? Today's political and commercial world is about collecting information about people. Every keystroke from tweets, every keystroke biometric measuring keyboarding pattern, every student accessing pages in online textbooks, is being recorded and logged for data retrieval for potential buyers. There are seemingly endless electronically linked storage sites that collect data on what information we search, what movies we prefer, where we like to vacation, what books we read, and the list goes on. Our society is developing a resigned acceptance of being under surveillance-both visual and audio-from any governmental authority, shopkeeper, or casual cell phone photographer. Coupled with that is a growing concern among some that we are losing the valued right to keep some information about ourselves confidential and to have control over how any personal information is used and distributed. The privacy issue is not new; it has been a topic in the courts for centuries. The difference today is the magnitude of the possibilities for invading a person's privacy and the range of uses, both positive and negative, for which that data is being used.Turow, Andrews, and Keizer have each taken an aspect of the complex world of privacy and shown the reader a web of positives and negatives that exist when the topic is closely examined. Turow's The Daily You takes the reader through a very detailed analysis of the world of advertising and how individual companies gather, package, and market information about you to any person or company willing to pay for that valued material. He covers the many clever ways data is collected as persons query Internet sites, tweet, and "like" items. Then he delves into the way consumer-centric insight is bought, sold, and used to the best marketing advantage to promote sales and attract people to particular websites and product lines. This may be viewed with both positive and negative eyes. On the positive, the more precise the data collected on users, the more likely they will have information that interests them displayed the next time they access the Internet. If they enjoy sports, for example, the content they see will more likely contain advertisements for sports events and equipment. On the negative, the data analyzers and artificial intelligent programs are screening the choices that will be displayed, causing a silo effect and censorship for the user. They will only view content and possibly only get special rewards coupons and deals that correspond to their current thinking and interests. This preselected display is based on what they have viewed, purchased, or searched for in the past. Tracking and targeting users is part of our digital landscape. Whether the information is collected and used only by a particular website, or the data is collected and brokered, the user must actively request that the information not be collected and used, a request that is not always honored. From a cultural viewpoint, Turow also points out the potential for creating privileged users, those who have a wide social following and allow their information to be packaged, foregoing privacy for perks. Their potential for passing information to a wide audience is valued. Those who have small social networks and want to protect their privacy are tagged as "waste" and leftout of promotional deals in marketing plans, creating an underclass of users. He provides detailed information on specific companies and how they gather the bits and bytes of our information and buying patterns without giving us compensation for that data or easy options to keep that personal information from being made public. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每日你:新广告业如何定义你的身份和价值/我知道你是谁,我看到你做了什么:社交网络和隐私的死亡/隐私
《每日你:新广告业如何定义你的身份和价值》约瑟夫·图罗著。纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,2011。234. 我知道你是谁,我看到你做了什么:社交网络和隐私的死亡。纽约:自由出版社,2011。253页,26.00美元。纽约:Picador, 2012。194页15.00美元隐私是任何自由社会的堡垒。这似乎是一个简单的概念——让人们决定他们想要公开的关于自己的哪些信息——但它真正需要什么?今天的政治和商业世界是关于收集人们的信息。每一次推特上的按键,每一次生物识别键盘模式的按键,每一个学生访问在线教科书的页面,都被记录下来,为潜在买家检索数据。似乎有无穷无尽的电子链接存储网站,收集我们搜索的信息,我们喜欢的电影,我们喜欢去哪里度假,我们读什么书,等等。我们的社会正在形成一种无可奈何的接受被监视——无论是视觉还是听觉——来自任何政府机构、店主或偶然的手机摄影师。与此同时,一些人越来越担心,我们正在失去对自己的一些信息保密的宝贵权利,以及对个人信息如何被使用和分发的控制权。隐私问题并不新鲜;几个世纪以来,这一直是法庭上的一个话题。今天的不同之处在于侵犯个人隐私的可能性之大,以及这些数据被用于积极和消极用途的范围之广。图罗、安德鲁斯和凯泽都从一个复杂的隐私世界中选取了一个方面,并向读者展示了仔细研究这个话题时存在的积极和消极的网络。特罗的《每日你》带领读者对广告界进行了非常详细的分析,分析了各个公司是如何收集、包装和推销有关你的信息给任何愿意为这些有价值的材料付费的人或公司的。他介绍了人们在查询网站、推特和“喜欢”项目时收集数据的许多巧妙方法。然后,他深入研究了以消费者为中心的洞察力是如何被购买、出售的,并用于最佳的营销优势,以促进销售,吸引人们到特定的网站和产品线。这可以用积极和消极的眼光来看待。从积极的方面来看,收集到的用户数据越精确,他们下次上网时就越有可能看到他们感兴趣的信息。例如,如果他们喜欢体育运动,他们看到的内容将更有可能包含体育赛事和设备的广告。在消极方面,数据分析和人工智能程序正在筛选将显示的选择,对用户造成筒仓效应和审查。他们只会浏览内容,可能只会得到与他们当前的想法和兴趣相对应的特殊奖励券和交易。这种预先选择的显示是基于他们过去看过、购买过或搜索过的内容。跟踪和定位用户是我们数字领域的一部分。无论是仅由特定网站收集和使用信息,还是收集和代理数据,用户都必须主动请求不收集和使用信息,这一请求并不总是得到尊重。从文化的角度来看,图罗还指出了创造特权用户的潜力,这些用户拥有广泛的社会追随者,允许他们的信息被打包,放弃隐私以获得额外好处。他们向广大受众传递信息的潜力受到重视。那些拥有小型社交网络并希望保护自己隐私的人被贴上了“废物”的标签,并被排除在营销计划的促销交易之外,从而形成了一个底层用户群体。他提供了具体公司的详细信息,以及他们如何收集我们的信息和购买模式,而不给我们提供数据补偿或简单的选择,以防止个人信息被公开。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity Matters: Economic Inequality and Policymaking During a Pandemic A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age Hate Crimes in Cyberspace We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1