Editing the Bible: Assessing the Task, Past and Present, J.S. Kloppenborg & J.H. Newman (Eds.) : book review

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.5860/choice.50-2403
E. Wendland
{"title":"Editing the Bible: Assessing the Task, Past and Present, J.S. Kloppenborg & J.H. Newman (Eds.) : book review","authors":"E. Wendland","doi":"10.5860/choice.50-2403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John Kloppenborg is Professor in the Department for the Study of Religion at the University of Toronto and Judith Newman is Associate Professor of Old Testament/Hebrew Bible at Emmanuel College, University of Toronto. In this volume of essays they include a select group of scholarly contributors who offer a variety of considered opinions on various issues that concern the \"editing\" of the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures (LXX and NT). Many of the collected ideas and insights offered, which derive from a 2007 Conference on Editorial Problems (University of Toronto), are innovative in the fields of textual criticism and canon composition, and several proposals may also be rather controversial in their claims and implications. However, all of the essays are thought-provoking and helpful for enabling one to better understand some of the salient questions, complexities, and difficulties that confront those who research and write about these subjects. There may be those in the field of biblical studies who tend to take such matters for granted, but that is not a constructive policy if one wishes to delve more deeply into the composition, transmission, and publication of the very Scripture texts that one desires to better understand, analyze, and/or discourse about.","PeriodicalId":40966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages","volume":"129 1","pages":"134-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-2403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

John Kloppenborg is Professor in the Department for the Study of Religion at the University of Toronto and Judith Newman is Associate Professor of Old Testament/Hebrew Bible at Emmanuel College, University of Toronto. In this volume of essays they include a select group of scholarly contributors who offer a variety of considered opinions on various issues that concern the "editing" of the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures (LXX and NT). Many of the collected ideas and insights offered, which derive from a 2007 Conference on Editorial Problems (University of Toronto), are innovative in the fields of textual criticism and canon composition, and several proposals may also be rather controversial in their claims and implications. However, all of the essays are thought-provoking and helpful for enabling one to better understand some of the salient questions, complexities, and difficulties that confront those who research and write about these subjects. There may be those in the field of biblical studies who tend to take such matters for granted, but that is not a constructive policy if one wishes to delve more deeply into the composition, transmission, and publication of the very Scripture texts that one desires to better understand, analyze, and/or discourse about.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编辑圣经:评估任务,过去和现在,J.S. Kloppenborg & J.H. Newman(编辑):书评
John Kloppenborg是多伦多大学宗教研究系教授,Judith Newman是多伦多大学伊曼纽尔学院旧约/希伯来圣经副教授。在这一卷的论文中,他们包括一组学术贡献者,他们就各种问题提供了各种经过深思熟虑的意见,这些问题涉及希伯来文和希腊文圣经(LXX和NT)的“编辑”。许多收集到的观点和见解来自2007年编辑问题会议(多伦多大学),在文本批评和正典组成领域是创新的,其中一些建议在其主张和含义上也可能相当有争议。然而,所有的文章都发人深省,有助于人们更好地理解那些研究和写作这些主题的人所面临的一些突出问题、复杂性和困难。在圣经研究领域,可能会有一些人倾向于认为这些事情是理所当然的,但如果一个人希望更深入地研究他希望更好地理解、分析和/或论述的圣经文本的组成、传播和出版,那么这不是一个建设性的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages
Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Editing the Bible: Assessing the Task, Past and Present, J.S. Kloppenborg & J.H. Newman (Eds.) : book review Is there any historiography in the Hebrew bible? A Hebrew - Greek comparison
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1