The Power of Graphic Narrative for Dementia Stories: Trauma, Aesthetics and Resilience in Sarah Leavitt�s Tangles (2012) and Dana Walrath�s Aliceheimer�s (2013)

E. Kaplan
{"title":"The Power of Graphic Narrative for Dementia Stories: Trauma, Aesthetics and Resilience in Sarah Leavitt�s Tangles (2012) and Dana Walrath�s Aliceheimer�s (2013)","authors":"E. Kaplan","doi":"10.5871/jba/011s2.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article has three aims: it first argues that the aesthetics of graphic novels, rarely considered in Humanities dementia research, are especially suited to narratives about traumatic dementia. Second, it argues that, within the graphic narrative genre, both indirection and realism can facilitate dementia representations. Third, it argues that the realism each author uses 'corrects' well-meaning, idealising, dementia images aimed at challenging negative stereotypes. In this study of Sarah Leavitt's Tangles and Dana Walrath's Aliceheimer's, I show that each benefits from a particular style of realism that I call, for Tangles, 'abstract realism', and for Aliceheimer�s 'adapted' or 'fantastic' realism. Each graphic realism style opens up for viewers the trauma of dementia for both the dementia subject herself and for those caring for her. Images move beyond stereotypes (while not idealising), furthering, via compassion, empathy and resilience, our understanding of this challenging condition so much a part of life today.","PeriodicalId":93790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the British Academy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the British Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/011s2.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article has three aims: it first argues that the aesthetics of graphic novels, rarely considered in Humanities dementia research, are especially suited to narratives about traumatic dementia. Second, it argues that, within the graphic narrative genre, both indirection and realism can facilitate dementia representations. Third, it argues that the realism each author uses 'corrects' well-meaning, idealising, dementia images aimed at challenging negative stereotypes. In this study of Sarah Leavitt's Tangles and Dana Walrath's Aliceheimer's, I show that each benefits from a particular style of realism that I call, for Tangles, 'abstract realism', and for Aliceheimer�s 'adapted' or 'fantastic' realism. Each graphic realism style opens up for viewers the trauma of dementia for both the dementia subject herself and for those caring for her. Images move beyond stereotypes (while not idealising), furthering, via compassion, empathy and resilience, our understanding of this challenging condition so much a part of life today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症故事的图形叙事力量:莎拉·莱维特的《缠结》(2012)和达纳·沃尔拉斯的《爱丽丝海默》(2013)中的创伤、美学和复原力
这篇文章有三个目的:首先,它认为在人文痴呆症研究中很少考虑的图画小说的美学,特别适合于关于创伤性痴呆症的叙述。其次,它认为,在图形叙事类型中,间接和现实主义都可以促进痴呆症的表现。第三,它认为每个作者使用的现实主义“纠正”善意的、理想化的、痴呆的形象,旨在挑战负面的刻板印象。在对Sarah Leavitt的《缠结》和Dana Walrath的《爱丽丝海默的缠结》的研究中,我发现两者都受益于一种特定的现实主义风格,我把《缠结》称为“抽象现实主义”,而把爱丽丝海默称为“改编”或“梦幻”现实主义。每种图形现实主义风格都为观众打开了痴呆症的创伤,既为痴呆症主题本身,也为照顾她的人。图像超越了刻板印象(而不是理想化),通过同情、同理心和韧性,进一步加深了我们对这一具有挑战性的状况的理解,这是当今生活的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Russian War against Ukraine: a case study in climate, conflict, and green recovery The meaning of Brexit and the future of the Union Language at school: literature or linguistics? Immersion – new media and old ambitions The English education system: undervalued and over-measured
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1