An Investigation of Learning Efficacy, Management Difficulties and Improvements in Tertiary CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) Programmes in Taiwan: A Survey of Stakeholder Perspectives

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL Pub Date : 2016-06-11 DOI:10.5294/LACLIL.2016.9.1.4
Wen-hsien Yang
{"title":"An Investigation of Learning Efficacy, Management Difficulties and Improvements in Tertiary CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) Programmes in Taiwan: A Survey of Stakeholder Perspectives","authors":"Wen-hsien Yang","doi":"10.5294/LACLIL.2016.9.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2011, Taiwan’s Ministry of Education conducted a national-scale appraisal of 92CLIL programmes. However, we lack an effective model for examining by preciselyhow much improvement in the quality of the CLIL programmes will rise asa consequence of the increased language proficiency and the acquisition of disciplinaryknowledge. To gain greater insight into the relationship between theexecution and appraisal results of CLIL and the facilitation of content and foreignlanguage acquisition, we researched the stakeholders’ perceptions of and attitudestowards CLIL in order to create a reference for the national appraisal results.Our aim was to collect both quantitative and qualitative data on the programmemanagers, teachers and learners in 12 CLIL programmes nationwide by way of aquestionnaire survey and interviews. We assessed these data to answer our mainresearch questions regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of employing CLIL educationin higher education in Taiwan. In total, 53 undergraduates and postgraduateCLIL students completed a self-designed questionnaire survey, investigatingtheir perceptions of and attitudes towards CLIL education. In addition, interviewswith CLIL programme managers and student focus-groups were also conductedto further probe their opinions on CLIL. The findings mainly revealed that the learners’satisfaction with the CLIL approach is greatly affected by their level of languageproficiency. Our findings can significantly advance our understanding ofthe current situation of CLIL education and the likely effects of changing the curriculaand directions of delivering content and foreign language courses at thetertiary level in Taiwan. doi:10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.4","PeriodicalId":43989,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL","volume":"9 1","pages":"64-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5294/LACLIL.2016.9.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

In 2011, Taiwan’s Ministry of Education conducted a national-scale appraisal of 92CLIL programmes. However, we lack an effective model for examining by preciselyhow much improvement in the quality of the CLIL programmes will rise asa consequence of the increased language proficiency and the acquisition of disciplinaryknowledge. To gain greater insight into the relationship between theexecution and appraisal results of CLIL and the facilitation of content and foreignlanguage acquisition, we researched the stakeholders’ perceptions of and attitudestowards CLIL in order to create a reference for the national appraisal results.Our aim was to collect both quantitative and qualitative data on the programmemanagers, teachers and learners in 12 CLIL programmes nationwide by way of aquestionnaire survey and interviews. We assessed these data to answer our mainresearch questions regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of employing CLIL educationin higher education in Taiwan. In total, 53 undergraduates and postgraduateCLIL students completed a self-designed questionnaire survey, investigatingtheir perceptions of and attitudes towards CLIL education. In addition, interviewswith CLIL programme managers and student focus-groups were also conductedto further probe their opinions on CLIL. The findings mainly revealed that the learners’satisfaction with the CLIL approach is greatly affected by their level of languageproficiency. Our findings can significantly advance our understanding ofthe current situation of CLIL education and the likely effects of changing the curriculaand directions of delivering content and foreign language courses at thetertiary level in Taiwan. doi:10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.4
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
台湾高等教育内容与语言整合学习课程之学习效能、管理困难与改善之调查:持份者观点之调查
2011年,台湾教育部对92个clil项目进行了全国范围的评估。然而,我们缺乏一个有效的模型来准确地检验CLIL课程的质量会随着语言能力的提高和学科知识的获取而提高多少。为了更深入地了解CLIL的执行和评估结果与内容促进和外语习得之间的关系,我们研究了利益相关者对CLIL的看法和态度,以便为国家评估结果提供参考。我们的目的是通过问卷调查和访谈的方式收集全国12个CLIL项目的项目经理、教师和学习者的定量和定性数据。我们评估这些资料,以回答我们的主要研究问题,即台湾高等教育采用CLIL教育的效能与效果。共有53名本科生和研究生完成了一份自行设计的问卷调查,调查了他们对CLIL教育的看法和态度。此外,我们还对CLIL项目经理和学生焦点小组进行了访谈,以进一步了解他们对CLIL的看法。研究结果表明,学习者对CLIL教学法的满意度受其语言水平的显著影响。我们的研究结果可以帮助我们进一步了解台湾高等教育中语教学法的现状,以及改变教学内容和外语课程的方向可能产生的影响。doi: 10.5294 / laclil.2016.9.1.4
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived Constraints of Contextual Factors on CLIL Teachers’ Effectiveness: Effect of a Training Course Can WhatsApp Enhance Students’ Learning in CLIL? Women’s Suffrage Through the CLIL Approach CLIL and Critical Thinking Through Literature: Activities on Poems about Argentina’s Military Dictatorship Making emotions count through CLIL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1