Assessment in CLIL: Test development for content and language for teaching natural science in English as a foreign language

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL Pub Date : 2016-11-23 DOI:10.5294/LACLIL.2016.9.2.3
J. P. Leal
{"title":"Assessment in CLIL: Test development for content and language for teaching natural science in English as a foreign language","authors":"J. P. Leal","doi":"10.5294/LACLIL.2016.9.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On-going bilingual programs without regard to needs analysis; little research on the actual effects of CLIL in Colombia and vague awareness or knowledge about the necessary considerations for effective CLIL programs, underpin the need to address a particular issue of curriculum as it is summative assessment. This small scale study takes place in a Natural Science class using a CLIL approach with thirdgrade students at A2 proficiency level who have been progressively immersed in a bilingual program at a private school in Bogota, Colombia. Regularly scheduled tests were analyzed in order to identify suitable assessment items hat simultaneously report on the content and language achievement in order to provide guidelines for test development that are aligned with the teaching goals, consistently measure students’ progress, and facilitate teaching practices. This study entails a systematic examination of test items using formal item analysis to depict test validity from an assessment grid that integrates content, at different knowledge levels, CALP functions and cognitive skills. The study concludes that the assessment grid is a helpful tool to discriminate language and content achievement in the results of multiple-choice CLIL tests, by increasing teachers’ understanding of the language demands of test items and the level of difficulty of content tasks. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.3","PeriodicalId":43989,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL","volume":"43 1","pages":"293-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5294/LACLIL.2016.9.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

On-going bilingual programs without regard to needs analysis; little research on the actual effects of CLIL in Colombia and vague awareness or knowledge about the necessary considerations for effective CLIL programs, underpin the need to address a particular issue of curriculum as it is summative assessment. This small scale study takes place in a Natural Science class using a CLIL approach with thirdgrade students at A2 proficiency level who have been progressively immersed in a bilingual program at a private school in Bogota, Colombia. Regularly scheduled tests were analyzed in order to identify suitable assessment items hat simultaneously report on the content and language achievement in order to provide guidelines for test development that are aligned with the teaching goals, consistently measure students’ progress, and facilitate teaching practices. This study entails a systematic examination of test items using formal item analysis to depict test validity from an assessment grid that integrates content, at different knowledge levels, CALP functions and cognitive skills. The study concludes that the assessment grid is a helpful tool to discriminate language and content achievement in the results of multiple-choice CLIL tests, by increasing teachers’ understanding of the language demands of test items and the level of difficulty of content tasks. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.3
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CLIL中的评估:以英语为外语的自然科学教学内容和语言的测试开发
不考虑需求分析的持续双语项目;关于哥伦比亚CLIL实际效果的研究很少,对有效CLIL项目的必要考虑因素的认识或知识也很模糊,因此需要解决课程的特定问题,因为它是总结性评估。这项小规模的研究是在自然科学课堂上进行的,使用CLIL方法,在哥伦比亚波哥大的一所私立学校,三年级学生的熟练程度达到A2,他们已经逐步沉浸在双语课程中。对定期安排的测试进行分析,以确定合适的评估项目,同时报告内容和语言成就,以便为与教学目标一致的测试开发提供指导,始终衡量学生的进步,并促进教学实践。本研究需要对测试项目进行系统的检查,使用正式的项目分析来描述来自评估网格的测试效度,该网格集成了不同知识水平、CALP功能和认知技能的内容。本研究认为,通过提高教师对测试项目的语言需求和内容任务难度的理解,评估网格是一种有助于区分多选题CLIL测试结果中的语言成就和内容成就的工具。doi: 10.5294 / laclil.2016.9.2.3
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived Constraints of Contextual Factors on CLIL Teachers’ Effectiveness: Effect of a Training Course Can WhatsApp Enhance Students’ Learning in CLIL? Women’s Suffrage Through the CLIL Approach CLIL and Critical Thinking Through Literature: Activities on Poems about Argentina’s Military Dictatorship Making emotions count through CLIL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1