Database Analysis of Acidic Proteins from Halophilic Species and Their Corresponding Basic Proteins from Non-halophilic Species

H. Nakashima, K. Homma, Michiko Yamazaki, M. Ishizaki, K. Mawatari
{"title":"Database Analysis of Acidic Proteins from Halophilic Species and Their Corresponding Basic Proteins from Non-halophilic Species","authors":"H. Nakashima, K. Homma, Michiko Yamazaki, M. Ishizaki, K. Mawatari","doi":"10.9734/bbj/2016/25207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To reveal which amino acid residues determine whether a protein is acidic or basic between orthologous pairs, acidic proteins from halophilic species and corresponding basic proteins from non-halophilic species were compared. Similarly acidic versus acidic protein pairs, and basic versus basic protein pairs were also analyzed. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Graduate Course of Medical Science and Technology, School of Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Japan. Methodology: Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 was used as halophilic species and Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis, and radiation resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans were used as non-halophilic species. The three species were selected because their proteins were closely Original Research Article Nakashima et al.; BBJ, 14(2): 1-12, 2016; Article no.BBJ.25207 2 related each other. The amino acid compositions were compared and the amino acid substitutions were counted for the orthologous protein pairs between Halobacterium and B. subtilis. Similar comparison was done for the proteins between Halobacterium and D. radiodurans. Results: The Asp and Glu residues are determinant whether a protein of Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 is acidic or basic. Amino acid substitutions to increase the Asp residues in the acidic proteins of Halobacterium from the corresponding proteins of non-halophilic species were almost identical whether the corresponding proteins were acidic or basic. This result suggested that the change of protein charges from basic proteins to acidic ones was same as from acidic proteins to acidic ones. The proteins of Halobacterium showed a tendency to have residues with smaller side chain than the proteins of B. subtilis / D. radiodurans.","PeriodicalId":90120,"journal":{"name":"British biotechnology journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British biotechnology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bbj/2016/25207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To reveal which amino acid residues determine whether a protein is acidic or basic between orthologous pairs, acidic proteins from halophilic species and corresponding basic proteins from non-halophilic species were compared. Similarly acidic versus acidic protein pairs, and basic versus basic protein pairs were also analyzed. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Graduate Course of Medical Science and Technology, School of Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Japan. Methodology: Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 was used as halophilic species and Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis, and radiation resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans were used as non-halophilic species. The three species were selected because their proteins were closely Original Research Article Nakashima et al.; BBJ, 14(2): 1-12, 2016; Article no.BBJ.25207 2 related each other. The amino acid compositions were compared and the amino acid substitutions were counted for the orthologous protein pairs between Halobacterium and B. subtilis. Similar comparison was done for the proteins between Halobacterium and D. radiodurans. Results: The Asp and Glu residues are determinant whether a protein of Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 is acidic or basic. Amino acid substitutions to increase the Asp residues in the acidic proteins of Halobacterium from the corresponding proteins of non-halophilic species were almost identical whether the corresponding proteins were acidic or basic. This result suggested that the change of protein charges from basic proteins to acidic ones was same as from acidic proteins to acidic ones. The proteins of Halobacterium showed a tendency to have residues with smaller side chain than the proteins of B. subtilis / D. radiodurans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗜盐物种酸性蛋白与非嗜盐物种相应碱性蛋白的数据库分析
目的:通过比较来自嗜盐物种的酸性蛋白和来自非嗜盐物种的相应碱性蛋白,揭示在同源对之间,哪些氨基酸残基决定了一个蛋白是酸性还是碱性。同样,酸性蛋白质对与酸性蛋白质对,碱性蛋白质对与碱性蛋白质对也进行了分析。学习地点和时间:日本金泽大学健康科学学院医学科学与技术研究生班临床检验科学系。方法:以嗜盐菌NRC-1和革兰氏阳性枯草芽孢杆菌分别作为嗜盐菌种和非嗜盐菌种,以耐辐射菌耐辐射球菌作为非嗜盐菌种。选择这三个物种是因为它们的蛋白质接近。植物学报,14(2):1-12,2016;文章no.BBJ。2 .彼此相关。比较了盐杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的氨基酸组成,并计算了同源蛋白对的氨基酸取代量。对盐杆菌和耐辐射菌之间的蛋白质进行了类似的比较。结果:盐杆菌NRC-1蛋白的Asp和Glu残基决定了其酸性或碱性。无论是酸性蛋白还是碱性蛋白,在盐杆菌的酸性蛋白中增加Asp残基的氨基酸取代作用与非嗜盐菌的相应蛋白几乎相同。结果表明,碱性蛋白质向酸性蛋白质的电荷变化与酸性蛋白质向酸性蛋白质的电荷变化相同。与枯草芽孢杆菌/耐辐射细菌相比,盐杆菌的蛋白质具有更小侧链的残基。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genetic Variations in Asparagus racemosus, an Endangered Medicinal Herb Endemic to India Using RAPD Markers. Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria Capable to Breakdown Citric Acid during Ivorian Cocoa Fermentation and Response of Bacterial Strains to Fermentative Conditions. Genomic Analysis of Fungal Species No.11243 Mutant Strains Provides Insights into the Relationship between Mutations and High Productivity Evaluation of Virulence of Tanzanian Strains of Fowlpox and Pigeonpox Viruses in Chickens Production of Bovine Herpesvirus-1 Vaccine Strains in MDBK Cells Using BelloCell Bioreactor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1