De-Sign as a Destiny of Negation

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SEMIOTICS Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5840/AJS202112066
Farouk Y. Seif
{"title":"De-Sign as a Destiny of Negation","authors":"Farouk Y. Seif","doi":"10.5840/AJS202112066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Boundaries and borders are undefined and ambiguous paradoxical phenomena, but there is a prevalent repudiation of their ephemerality and transitoriness. Crossing unaccustomed boundaries and traversing untried borders can be achieved by understanding the boundless scope of design and semiotics. Since the idea of design and the doctrine of signs are not restricted by either the humanities or sciences, De-sign (fusion of design and signs) is a boundaryless and transdisciplinary perspective that cannot tolerate cultural enclaves, social dogmas, and an insistence on absolute reality. Engaging in the de-sign process is a journey of negation through which human beings can traverse unfamiliar borders while maintaining their familiar boundaries. In negation, we experience paradoxical thinking and cognitive dissonance, which are associated with all antinomies intrinsic to De-sign. These antinomies can be endured by recognizing the audacity of design and the resilient role of signs. Negation goes beyond the perception of rigid borders and the acceptance of absolute boundaries, which frequently incite ethnocentrism and trigger xenophobia. The destiny of negation depends on a sense of wonder, awareness of epistemological fallibilism, and uncommon sense in order to persevere through contradictions between distinctiveness and sameness. Axiologically, where establishing boundaries can maintain identities, traversing borders can never diminish distinctiveness. Paradoxically, by delving into unfamiliar boundaries and crossing over untried borders, we discover ways to transform our own boundaries and reframe our conception of borders. Boundaries are more than barriers; the distances between them are bridges of invisible relations for thrivability and breakthrough insights.","PeriodicalId":42572,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SEMIOTICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SEMIOTICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/AJS202112066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Boundaries and borders are undefined and ambiguous paradoxical phenomena, but there is a prevalent repudiation of their ephemerality and transitoriness. Crossing unaccustomed boundaries and traversing untried borders can be achieved by understanding the boundless scope of design and semiotics. Since the idea of design and the doctrine of signs are not restricted by either the humanities or sciences, De-sign (fusion of design and signs) is a boundaryless and transdisciplinary perspective that cannot tolerate cultural enclaves, social dogmas, and an insistence on absolute reality. Engaging in the de-sign process is a journey of negation through which human beings can traverse unfamiliar borders while maintaining their familiar boundaries. In negation, we experience paradoxical thinking and cognitive dissonance, which are associated with all antinomies intrinsic to De-sign. These antinomies can be endured by recognizing the audacity of design and the resilient role of signs. Negation goes beyond the perception of rigid borders and the acceptance of absolute boundaries, which frequently incite ethnocentrism and trigger xenophobia. The destiny of negation depends on a sense of wonder, awareness of epistemological fallibilism, and uncommon sense in order to persevere through contradictions between distinctiveness and sameness. Axiologically, where establishing boundaries can maintain identities, traversing borders can never diminish distinctiveness. Paradoxically, by delving into unfamiliar boundaries and crossing over untried borders, we discover ways to transform our own boundaries and reframe our conception of borders. Boundaries are more than barriers; the distances between them are bridges of invisible relations for thrivability and breakthrough insights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为否定命运的设计
边界和边界是未定义的和模棱两可的矛盾现象,但有一个普遍的否定他们的短暂性和短暂性。通过理解设计和符号学的无限范围,可以跨越不习惯的边界和穿越未曾尝试过的边界。由于设计思想和符号学说不受人文或科学的限制,设计符号(设计与符号的融合)是一种无边界和跨学科的观点,不能容忍文化飞地,社会教条和对绝对现实的坚持。参与设计过程是一个否定的旅程,通过这个过程,人类可以跨越陌生的边界,同时保持他们熟悉的边界。在否定中,我们经历了矛盾的思维和认知失调,这与设计固有的所有二律背反有关。这些矛盾可以通过认识到设计的大胆性和标志的弹性作用来忍受。否定超越了对僵化边界的认识和对绝对边界的接受,后者经常煽动种族中心主义和引发仇外心理。否定的命运取决于惊奇感、认识论的可错性意识和不寻常感,从而在区别性与同一性的矛盾中坚持下去。从价值论上讲,在建立边界可以维持身份的地方,跨越边界永远不会削弱独特性。矛盾的是,通过深入研究不熟悉的边界,跨越未曾尝试过的边界,我们发现了改变自己边界的方法,并重新构建了我们对边界的概念。界限不仅仅是障碍;它们之间的距离是通往繁荣和突破性见解的无形联系的桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SEMIOTICS
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SEMIOTICS HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Labyrith of De-sign Multiple Perspectives in Semiotics, Illustrated with Tagmemic Analysis of Tic-Tac-Toe in advance The Semiotic Square Applied to Silence in advance The Indeterminacy of Reality and the Fallibility of Science in advance Toward an Adequate Theoretical Framework for Interpreting Complex Signification in Music in advance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1