Philosophical Breakdowns and Divine Intervention

Q1 Arts and Humanities Ancient Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5840/ancientphil202343110
Thomas Slabon
{"title":"Philosophical Breakdowns and Divine Intervention","authors":"Thomas Slabon","doi":"10.5840/ancientphil202343110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates how Plato thinks we secure necessary motivational conditions for inquiry. After presenting a typology of zetetic breakdowns in the dialogues, I identify norms of inquiry Plato believes all successful inquirers must satisfy. Satisfying these norms requires trust that philosophy will not harm but benefit inquirers overall. This trust cannot be secured by protreptic argument. Instead, it requires divine intervention—an extra-rational foundation for rational inquiry.","PeriodicalId":38413,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ancient Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil202343110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates how Plato thinks we secure necessary motivational conditions for inquiry. After presenting a typology of zetetic breakdowns in the dialogues, I identify norms of inquiry Plato believes all successful inquirers must satisfy. Satisfying these norms requires trust that philosophy will not harm but benefit inquirers overall. This trust cannot be secured by protreptic argument. Instead, it requires divine intervention—an extra-rational foundation for rational inquiry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哲学崩溃和神的干预
本文探讨柏拉图认为我们如何确保探究的必要动机条件。在介绍了对话中探究性崩溃的类型学之后,我确定了柏拉图认为所有成功的探究者都必须满足的探究规范。要满足这些规范,就需要相信哲学总体上不会伤害而会使调查者受益。这种信任不能用诡辩的论据来保证。相反,它需要神的干预——理性探究的超理性基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ancient Philosophy
Ancient Philosophy Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Seneca Pythagorean Topoi in Aristophanes’ Birds 1553–1564 Philosophical Breakdowns and Divine Intervention Sextus on Place Socrates on Self-Improvement: Knowledge, Virtue, and Happiness. By Nicholas D. Smith
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1