Reaffirmation of the methods and spirit of literary criticism: Contribution to the interpretation of The history of Serbian literature by Jovan Deretić

Bastina Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5937/bastina31-31036
M. Mumović
{"title":"Reaffirmation of the methods and spirit of literary criticism: Contribution to the interpretation of The history of Serbian literature by Jovan Deretić","authors":"M. Mumović","doi":"10.5937/bastina31-31036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses five monographs by Jovan Deretić, which the author considers \"accompanying books\" of his History of Serbian Literature. These are: Marko Kraljević's riddle - about the nature of historicity in Serbian folk epics, The path of Serbian literature - identity, borders, aspirations, Poetics of Serbian literature, Serbian folk epics and Etudes from old Serbian literature. In this paper, we analyze them as a contribution to the interpretation of the History of Serbian Literature, the most comprehensive history of literature in Serbian science to the extent that they are important as proof of Deretić's great synthesis and consideration of the function of literary criticism in Serbian culture. An important definition of the \"accompanying books\" is provided by the author in their prefaces and notes. It is summarized in the theoretical and applied level in the process of considering important issues of Serbian literary history: periodization and classification of literature, poetic or historical determinants and the significance of particular epochs, writers, or genres. A review of the critical evaluation of Serbian literature and historical and cultural heritage in the accompanying books shows that Deretić pragmatized his scientific thought and reaffirmed literary criticism, directing it \"for the benefit of the people\". This means that he gave it a practical and social function and intended it \"for a distant generation\".","PeriodicalId":33857,"journal":{"name":"Bastina","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bastina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/bastina31-31036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper discusses five monographs by Jovan Deretić, which the author considers "accompanying books" of his History of Serbian Literature. These are: Marko Kraljević's riddle - about the nature of historicity in Serbian folk epics, The path of Serbian literature - identity, borders, aspirations, Poetics of Serbian literature, Serbian folk epics and Etudes from old Serbian literature. In this paper, we analyze them as a contribution to the interpretation of the History of Serbian Literature, the most comprehensive history of literature in Serbian science to the extent that they are important as proof of Deretić's great synthesis and consideration of the function of literary criticism in Serbian culture. An important definition of the "accompanying books" is provided by the author in their prefaces and notes. It is summarized in the theoretical and applied level in the process of considering important issues of Serbian literary history: periodization and classification of literature, poetic or historical determinants and the significance of particular epochs, writers, or genres. A review of the critical evaluation of Serbian literature and historical and cultural heritage in the accompanying books shows that Deretić pragmatized his scientific thought and reaffirmed literary criticism, directing it "for the benefit of the people". This means that he gave it a practical and social function and intended it "for a distant generation".
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重申文学批评的方法和精神:对塞尔维亚文学史解释的贡献,作者约万·德雷季奇
本文讨论了约万·德列季奇的五部专著,作者认为它们是他的《塞尔维亚文学史》的“配套书”。主要包括:马尔科·克拉耶维奇的谜语——关于塞尔维亚民间史诗历史性的本质;塞尔维亚文学的道路——身份、边界、抱负;塞尔维亚文学的诗学;塞尔维亚民间史诗和塞尔维亚古代文学的练习曲。在本文中,我们分析它们作为对塞尔维亚文学史的解释的贡献,塞尔维亚文学史是塞尔维亚科学中最全面的文学史,因为它们是德雷季奇对塞尔维亚文化中文学批评功能的伟大综合和考虑的重要证据。作者在前言和注释中提供了“随书”的重要定义。在考虑塞尔维亚文学史的重要问题的过程中,它在理论和应用层面进行了总结:文学的分期和分类,诗歌或历史决定因素以及特定时代,作家或体裁的意义。对附带书籍中对塞尔维亚文学和历史文化遗产的批判性评价的回顾表明,德雷季奇将他的科学思想付诸实践,并重申了文学批评,指导文学批评“为人民的利益”。这意味着他赋予了它实用和社会功能,并打算让它“留给遥远的一代人”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOR IN SITUATION OF ECONOMIC CRISIS НОРМАТИВНИ АСПЕКТИ УПРАВНОГ МОНИТОРИНГА СЛУЖБИ БЕЗБЕДНОСТИ РЕПУБЛИКЕ СРБИЈЕ НОВИ МЕДИЈИ – ВИРТУЕЛНО У РЕАЛНОМ СВЕТУ ОБРАЗОВАЊА ПРОФИЛИСAЊЕ ОСУЈЕЋЕНЕ ОМЛAДИНЕ (POSIT) У РЕПУБЛИЦИ СРПСКОЈ ‒ ДЕСЕТ ГОДИНA ПОСЛИЈЕ МАХМУТ БАКАЛИ – ПРИЛОГ ЗА ПОЛИТИЧКУ БИОГРАФИЈУ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1