Restitution of agricultural land in Serbia: Comparative legal aspects

IF 0.8 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5937/ekopolj2004353r
Ljiljana Rajnović, Snežana Cico, Zoran Brljak
{"title":"Restitution of agricultural land in Serbia: Comparative legal aspects","authors":"Ljiljana Rajnović, Snežana Cico, Zoran Brljak","doi":"10.5937/ekopolj2004353r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of returning the confiscated property to the previous owners in the Republic of Serbia arose as a process that included all the countries of Eastern Europe and other countries of the former communist system in which mostly state property existed. Restitution is part of the transition process, which implies comprehensive changes in the state, including privatization of the state sector and market operations on the principles of private property, but also as a need to correct the injustice done to former owners of confiscated property. According to Serbian legislation, restitution is obligatory, but in practice it is very difficult and slow to realize, even though this process realizes one of the basic human rights of citizens described in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights the right to free enjoyment of private property. In this paper, the authors analyze the possibilities of returning agricultural land, legal regulations and implemented solutions in practice, on the example of a unit of local selfgovernment, on whose territory there is a state land fund that can be the subject of return. © 2020 EA. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":45567,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture","volume":"67 1","pages":"1353-1366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/ekopolj2004353r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The idea of returning the confiscated property to the previous owners in the Republic of Serbia arose as a process that included all the countries of Eastern Europe and other countries of the former communist system in which mostly state property existed. Restitution is part of the transition process, which implies comprehensive changes in the state, including privatization of the state sector and market operations on the principles of private property, but also as a need to correct the injustice done to former owners of confiscated property. According to Serbian legislation, restitution is obligatory, but in practice it is very difficult and slow to realize, even though this process realizes one of the basic human rights of citizens described in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights the right to free enjoyment of private property. In this paper, the authors analyze the possibilities of returning agricultural land, legal regulations and implemented solutions in practice, on the example of a unit of local selfgovernment, on whose territory there is a state land fund that can be the subject of return. © 2020 EA. All rights reserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞尔维亚农业用地的归还:比较法律方面
将没收的财产归还塞尔维亚共和国以前的所有者的想法是作为一个包括所有东欧国家和其他主要存在国有财产的前共产主义制度国家的进程而产生的。归还是过渡进程的一部分,这意味着国家的全面变革,包括国营部门的私有化和基于私有财产原则的市场运作,但也需要纠正对没收财产的前所有者的不公正待遇。根据塞尔维亚的法律,赔偿是强制性的,但在实践中,尽管这一过程实现了联合国世界人权宣言中所描述的公民的基本人权之一,即自由享受私有财产的权利,但实现起来却非常困难和缓慢。本文以一个地方自治单位为例,分析了农地返还的可能性、法律规定和实践中的实施方案,该单位境内有国家土地基金可以作为返还主体。©2020 EA保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture
Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUPPLYING THE DEFENSE SYSTEM WITH FOOD PRODUCTS IN CONDITIONS OF DISTURBANCE ON THE MARKET ARMED CONFLICT IN UKRAINE: FOOD SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS THE MARKETING MYOPIA OF SERBIAN RAKIJA DISTILLERS THE PERCEPTIONS OF WINE CONSUMERS REGARDING THE USE OF DIGITAL WINE LISTS IN DIGITALLY ORIENTED RESTAURANTS THE CONCENTRATION OF THE AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK SECTOR IN THE VISEGRAD GROUP AFTER MEMBERSHIP TO THE EUROPEAN UNION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1