The relationship between lis pendens and exclusive international jurisdiction based on a choice of court agreement in the law of the Hague Conference and Bosnia and Herzegovina

A. Poljić
{"title":"The relationship between lis pendens and exclusive international jurisdiction based on a choice of court agreement in the law of the Hague Conference and Bosnia and Herzegovina","authors":"A. Poljić","doi":"10.5937/gakv93-28341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the paper refers to the analysis of the exercise of the will of the contracting parties regarding the jurisdiction of the court in the law of the Hague Conference and Bosnia and Herzegovina. The exercise of the will of the contracting parties may be limited by the institute of lis pendens, which makes it impossible to conduct two proceedings between the same parties simultaneously for the same claim based on the same facts, giving priority to the first one, regardless of agreed-upon international jurisdiction. By agreeing on the jurisdiction, the contracting parties decide which court will resolve their dispute, which is extremely important for them. Based on the analysis of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, it is concluded that preference is given to proceedings before the chosen court, with certain exceptions when the agreement of the parties will not apply. The law of Bosnia and Herzegovina applies the rules of lis pendens which may prevent the application of the agreement of the parties.","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv93-28341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the paper refers to the analysis of the exercise of the will of the contracting parties regarding the jurisdiction of the court in the law of the Hague Conference and Bosnia and Herzegovina. The exercise of the will of the contracting parties may be limited by the institute of lis pendens, which makes it impossible to conduct two proceedings between the same parties simultaneously for the same claim based on the same facts, giving priority to the first one, regardless of agreed-upon international jurisdiction. By agreeing on the jurisdiction, the contracting parties decide which court will resolve their dispute, which is extremely important for them. Based on the analysis of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, it is concluded that preference is given to proceedings before the chosen court, with certain exceptions when the agreement of the parties will not apply. The law of Bosnia and Herzegovina applies the rules of lis pendens which may prevent the application of the agreement of the parties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未决案件与海牙会议和波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那法律中基于选择法院协定的专属国际管辖权之间的关系
该文件的主题涉及对缔约方在海牙会议和波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那的法律中对法院管辖权行使意愿的分析。缔约各方的意志的行使可能受到未决诉讼制度的限制,这就不可能在同一当事方之间就基于同一事实的同一索赔同时进行两项诉讼,而不管商定的国际管辖权如何,优先考虑第一个诉讼。通过商定管辖权,缔约双方决定由哪个法院来解决他们的争端,这对他们来说是极其重要的。根据对《海牙选择法院协议公约》的分析,得出的结论是,优先在选定的法院进行诉讼,但在当事方的协议不适用的情况下有某些例外。波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那的法律适用可能妨碍双方协定适用的未决法律规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over crimes committed on the territory of Afghanistan The request for the protection of legality: Theoretical and practical aspects The relationship between condictio and version in REM in modern law The national assembly of the Republic of Serbia and the German Bundestag: A comparative legal analysis Advanced techniques in the analysis of traffic accidents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1