Transboundary issues and cooperation in the domain of environmental protection in the legislations of Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina

D. Todić, J. Todić
{"title":"Transboundary issues and cooperation in the domain of environmental protection in the legislations of Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina","authors":"D. Todić, J. Todić","doi":"10.5937/gakv94-38993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the normative framework of cooperation in the domain of environmental protection among four countries in the region of Southeastern Europe. One of the countries is an EU member (Croatia), two others have the status of a candidate country (Serbia, Montenegro), and the fourth one is in the process of receiving the status of a candidate country (Bosnia and Herzegovina). The introduction highlights the importance of transboundary issues in the domain of environmental protection and lays out the methodological remarks. The first part of the article is dedicated to the most significant international agreements of global, (sub)regional, and bilateral character on the basis of which these four countries have an obligation (and the right) to cooperate. In the second part of the article, we provide an overview of the most significant norms of domestic law in the domain of environmental protection (basic laws), which are related to transboundary issues and the obligation of cooperation among countries. The goal of the article is to establish the existence of the obligations of countries to cooperate in the domain of environmental protection. We consider the thesis that the obligation of cooperation among countries in solving transboundary issues is clearly recognized in the relevant international agreements and the character of that obligation should be interpreted in the context of specific rights and obligations of signatory states for each international agreement in its own right. The obligations (and rights) of cooperation are also prescribed in the domestic legislatures of all four countries and the differences could be interpreted on the basis of specific circumstances within each of them.","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv94-38993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the normative framework of cooperation in the domain of environmental protection among four countries in the region of Southeastern Europe. One of the countries is an EU member (Croatia), two others have the status of a candidate country (Serbia, Montenegro), and the fourth one is in the process of receiving the status of a candidate country (Bosnia and Herzegovina). The introduction highlights the importance of transboundary issues in the domain of environmental protection and lays out the methodological remarks. The first part of the article is dedicated to the most significant international agreements of global, (sub)regional, and bilateral character on the basis of which these four countries have an obligation (and the right) to cooperate. In the second part of the article, we provide an overview of the most significant norms of domestic law in the domain of environmental protection (basic laws), which are related to transboundary issues and the obligation of cooperation among countries. The goal of the article is to establish the existence of the obligations of countries to cooperate in the domain of environmental protection. We consider the thesis that the obligation of cooperation among countries in solving transboundary issues is clearly recognized in the relevant international agreements and the character of that obligation should be interpreted in the context of specific rights and obligations of signatory states for each international agreement in its own right. The obligations (and rights) of cooperation are also prescribed in the domestic legislatures of all four countries and the differences could be interpreted on the basis of specific circumstances within each of them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克罗地亚、塞尔维亚、黑山和波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那立法中环境保护领域的跨界问题和合作
本文探讨了东南欧地区四个国家在环境保护领域合作的规范性框架。其中一个国家是欧盟成员国(克罗地亚),另外两个国家拥有候选国地位(塞尔维亚,黑山),第四个国家正在获得候选国地位(波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那)。导言部分强调了环境保护领域中跨界问题的重要性,并列出了方法上的评论。文章的第一部分专门讨论最重要的全球、(分)区域和双边性质的国际协议,在这些协议的基础上,这四个国家有义务(和权利)进行合作。在文章的第二部分,我们概述了环境保护领域最重要的国内法规范(基本法),这些规范与跨境问题和国家间合作的义务有关。该条的目的是确立各国在环境保护领域进行合作的义务。我们认为,有关国际协定明确承认各国合作解决跨界问题的义务,这种义务的性质应在每项国际协定签署国各自的具体权利和义务的背景下加以解释。所有四个国家的国内立法机构也规定了合作的义务(和权利),这些差异可以根据每个国家的具体情况加以解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over crimes committed on the territory of Afghanistan The request for the protection of legality: Theoretical and practical aspects The relationship between condictio and version in REM in modern law The national assembly of the Republic of Serbia and the German Bundestag: A comparative legal analysis Advanced techniques in the analysis of traffic accidents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1