Domestic violence between felony and misdemeanour law of the Republic of Srpska

Ljubana Sladić
{"title":"Domestic violence between felony and misdemeanour law of the Republic of Srpska","authors":"Ljubana Sladić","doi":"10.5937/gakv95-31801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since May 2020, a new legal solution which treats domestic violence exclusively as a felony has been in force as part of the legislature of the Republic of Srpska. In this article, the author argues against the exclusive treatment of domestic violence as a felony by pointing out that it should also be treated as a misdemeanour but with a clear dividing line. This article presents the results of research conducted to establish the attitudes of judicial bodies concerning the felonization of domestic violence and also present the statistical data from the Basic Court in Bijeljina in connection with this crime. By interpreting the results of the survey, it was concluded that the participants were familiar with the new legal solution regarding the felonization of domestic violence and the consequences that such solutions produce in practice. The majority of them are of the view that the solution that treats domestic violence exclusively as a felony is not beneficial nor is it beneficial for the court to issue urgent/protective measures in misdemeanour procedures. Instead, the court should issue such measures in felony procedures. Also, the participants agree that there has been no increase in the number of prison sentences nor a more stringent penal policy with regard to the perpetrators of domestic violence, and they agree that these individuals typically receive suspended sentences, which is supported by the abovementioned statistical data.","PeriodicalId":52738,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv95-31801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since May 2020, a new legal solution which treats domestic violence exclusively as a felony has been in force as part of the legislature of the Republic of Srpska. In this article, the author argues against the exclusive treatment of domestic violence as a felony by pointing out that it should also be treated as a misdemeanour but with a clear dividing line. This article presents the results of research conducted to establish the attitudes of judicial bodies concerning the felonization of domestic violence and also present the statistical data from the Basic Court in Bijeljina in connection with this crime. By interpreting the results of the survey, it was concluded that the participants were familiar with the new legal solution regarding the felonization of domestic violence and the consequences that such solutions produce in practice. The majority of them are of the view that the solution that treats domestic violence exclusively as a felony is not beneficial nor is it beneficial for the court to issue urgent/protective measures in misdemeanour procedures. Instead, the court should issue such measures in felony procedures. Also, the participants agree that there has been no increase in the number of prison sentences nor a more stringent penal policy with regard to the perpetrators of domestic violence, and they agree that these individuals typically receive suspended sentences, which is supported by the abovementioned statistical data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯普斯卡共和国家庭暴力重罪与轻罪之间的法律
自2020年5月以来,作为斯普斯卡共和国立法机构的一部分,一项新的法律解决方案已经生效,该解决方案将家庭暴力完全视为重罪。在本文中,作者反对将家庭暴力作为重罪单独处理,指出家庭暴力也应该作为轻罪处理,但要有明确的界限。本文介绍了为确定司法机构对家庭暴力罪化的态度而进行的研究结果,并介绍了比耶利纳基本法院关于这一罪行的统计数据。通过对调查结果的解释,得出的结论是,与会者熟悉关于将家庭暴力定为重罪的新的法律解决办法以及这种解决办法在实践中产生的后果。他们中的大多数人都认为,将家庭暴力完全视为重罪的解决方案是无益的,也不利于法院在轻罪程序中发布紧急/保护措施。相反,法院应该在重罪程序中发布此类措施。此外,与会者同意,对家庭暴力施暴者的监禁数量没有增加,也没有更严厉的刑事政策,他们同意这些人通常被判缓刑,这一点得到上述统计数据的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over crimes committed on the territory of Afghanistan The request for the protection of legality: Theoretical and practical aspects The relationship between condictio and version in REM in modern law The national assembly of the Republic of Serbia and the German Bundestag: A comparative legal analysis Advanced techniques in the analysis of traffic accidents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1