How can we teach our students if we do not know how they learn? Medical students' learning styles and academic performance

N. Milic, Andrija Pavlović, Valerija Janićijević
{"title":"How can we teach our students if we do not know how they learn? Medical students' learning styles and academic performance","authors":"N. Milic, Andrija Pavlović, Valerija Janićijević","doi":"10.5937/inovacije2302048m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Circumstances arising after the proclamation of the COVID-19 pandemic indicate the need for a permanent change in the access to education in medicine, the use of online tools and flexibility in the application of innovative learning solutions. This study aimed to determine medical students' learning styles and to use this information to improve distance learning platforms in order to promote personalized learning performance. A prospective cohort study was conducted among medical students attending the Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, who were enrolled in the obligatory Medical statistics and informatics (MSI) course during 2017-18 school year. The Index of Learning Styles (ILS) questionnaire was used to measure the dimensions of learning styles: Sensing/Intuitive, Visual/Verbal, Active/Reflective, and Sequential/Global. Additional data included demographic information and formal evaluation of student achievements. The existing online teaching approach supported by Moodle LMS was upgraded for upcoming 2020-21 school year to cover all student learning preferences. Four hundred sixty-two medical students were enrolled. Most students were female (64.5%); average age 21.4±1.1 years. The average problem solving and final statistics scores were 16.8±2.6 and 82.8±12.4, respectively. The dominant learning styles on the Active/Reflective and Sensing/Intuitive scales were active (74.9%) and sensing (50%). On the Visual/Verbal and Sequential/Global scales main learning preferences were neutral to visual (48.5% and 41.3%, respectively) and neutral to sequential (72.3% and 18.4%, respectively). The strong sensing learning style and age were significant predictors in multivariate regression models, with problem solving and final statistics score as dependent variables. Based on these findings, the existing learning platform has been upgraded to cover all learning preferences and personalize learning for students with learning styles other than sensing. Students with a strong sensing learning preference have a better academic performance in MSI. Better knowledge and understanding of students learning styles can aid instructors and curriculum designers to adjust teaching methods in order to help students gain their full academic potential during COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":32413,"journal":{"name":"Inovacije u Nastavi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inovacije u Nastavi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2302048m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Circumstances arising after the proclamation of the COVID-19 pandemic indicate the need for a permanent change in the access to education in medicine, the use of online tools and flexibility in the application of innovative learning solutions. This study aimed to determine medical students' learning styles and to use this information to improve distance learning platforms in order to promote personalized learning performance. A prospective cohort study was conducted among medical students attending the Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, who were enrolled in the obligatory Medical statistics and informatics (MSI) course during 2017-18 school year. The Index of Learning Styles (ILS) questionnaire was used to measure the dimensions of learning styles: Sensing/Intuitive, Visual/Verbal, Active/Reflective, and Sequential/Global. Additional data included demographic information and formal evaluation of student achievements. The existing online teaching approach supported by Moodle LMS was upgraded for upcoming 2020-21 school year to cover all student learning preferences. Four hundred sixty-two medical students were enrolled. Most students were female (64.5%); average age 21.4±1.1 years. The average problem solving and final statistics scores were 16.8±2.6 and 82.8±12.4, respectively. The dominant learning styles on the Active/Reflective and Sensing/Intuitive scales were active (74.9%) and sensing (50%). On the Visual/Verbal and Sequential/Global scales main learning preferences were neutral to visual (48.5% and 41.3%, respectively) and neutral to sequential (72.3% and 18.4%, respectively). The strong sensing learning style and age were significant predictors in multivariate regression models, with problem solving and final statistics score as dependent variables. Based on these findings, the existing learning platform has been upgraded to cover all learning preferences and personalize learning for students with learning styles other than sensing. Students with a strong sensing learning preference have a better academic performance in MSI. Better knowledge and understanding of students learning styles can aid instructors and curriculum designers to adjust teaching methods in order to help students gain their full academic potential during COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如果我们不知道学生是如何学习的,我们怎么教他们呢?医学生学习风格与学习成绩
宣布2019冠状病毒病大流行后出现的情况表明,有必要在获得医学教育、使用在线工具和灵活应用创新学习解决方案方面进行永久性改变。本研究旨在确定医学生的学习风格,并利用这些信息来改进远程学习平台,以促进个性化学习绩效。在贝尔格莱德大学医学院的医科学生中进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,这些学生在2017-18学年参加了必修的医学统计和信息学(MSI)课程。学习风格指数(ILS)问卷用于测量学习风格的维度:感觉/直觉、视觉/语言、主动/反思和顺序/全局。其他数据包括人口统计信息和学生成绩的正式评估。Moodle LMS支持的现有在线教学方法在即将到来的2020-21学年进行了升级,以涵盖所有学生的学习偏好。共有462名医科学生被录取。女生居多(64.5%);平均年龄21.4±1.1岁。解决问题的平均得分为16.8±2.6分,最终统计得分为82.8±12.4分。在主动/反思和感觉/直觉量表上占主导地位的学习风格为主动(74.9%)和感觉(50%)。在视觉/语言和顺序/全局尺度上,主要的学习偏好对视觉中性(分别为48.5%和41.3%),对顺序中性(分别为72.3%和18.4%)。在多元回归模型中,强感知学习风格和年龄是显著的预测因子,以问题解决和最终统计得分为因变量。基于这些发现,我们对现有的学习平台进行了升级,以覆盖所有的学习偏好,并为具有非感知学习风格的学生提供个性化学习。具有强烈感知学习偏好的学生在MSI中的学习成绩更好。更好地了解和理解学生的学习方式可以帮助教师和课程设计者调整教学方法,以帮助学生在COVID-19大流行期间充分发挥学术潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hermeneutics as a methodological approach to pedagogical research The impact of interactive digital technology exposure on generation Z students learning performance in computer graphics and simulations: A comparative study of Greece and Serbia Stavovi vaspitača o značaju razvijanja kompetencija u prirodnim naukama u radu sa decom predškolskog uzrasta Primena književnog teksta kao polazišta integrativnog pristupa u nastavi u prvom ciklusu osnovnog obrazovanja i vaspitanja How can we teach our students if we do not know how they learn? Medical students' learning styles and academic performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1