Homeschooling Reconsidered

Q4 Social Sciences Philosophical Inquiry in Education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.7202/1088379ar
J. Dwyer
{"title":"Homeschooling Reconsidered","authors":"J. Dwyer","doi":"10.7202/1088379ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Homeschooling was occasionally a subject of popular interest pre-COVID, when media reported horrific cases of child abuse under the guise of homeschooling, or when controversies erupted over efforts in state legislatures or local school boards to introduce very modest oversight measures. COVID made homeschooling something nearly every parent considered as a long-term educational option for their children, and something arguably -- depending on one's definition of homeschooling -- nearly all experienced. This article extracts from the societal experience of forced remote learning, challenging theoretical questions about the distinction between homeschooling and \"regular schooling\", the wisdom of traditional brick-and-mortar, multi-service schooling, and the appropriateness of state officials passing judgement on any private form of schooling.","PeriodicalId":36151,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1088379ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Homeschooling was occasionally a subject of popular interest pre-COVID, when media reported horrific cases of child abuse under the guise of homeschooling, or when controversies erupted over efforts in state legislatures or local school boards to introduce very modest oversight measures. COVID made homeschooling something nearly every parent considered as a long-term educational option for their children, and something arguably -- depending on one's definition of homeschooling -- nearly all experienced. This article extracts from the societal experience of forced remote learning, challenging theoretical questions about the distinction between homeschooling and "regular schooling", the wisdom of traditional brick-and-mortar, multi-service schooling, and the appropriateness of state officials passing judgement on any private form of schooling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在家教育重新考虑
在新冠疫情之前,当媒体报道了以在家上学为幌子的可怕的虐待儿童案件,或者当州立法机构或地方学校董事会引入非常温和的监督措施的努力引发争议时,在家上学偶尔会成为公众感兴趣的话题。COVID使在家上学成为几乎每个父母都认为是孩子长期教育选择的事情,而且可以说——取决于一个人对在家上学的定义——几乎所有人都经历过。本文从强制远程教育的社会经验中提取,挑战了关于家庭学校教育和“正规学校教育”之间区别的理论问题,传统的实体学校教育的智慧,多服务学校教育,以及国家官员对任何私立学校形式进行评判的适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophical Inquiry in Education
Philosophical Inquiry in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Education after COVID Promoting Critical Thinking in Anti-Critical Thinking Times: Lessons from COVID Discourse When the Façade of the Normal Falls Away Demoralization and Remoralization: The Power of Creating Space for Teachers’ Moral Centres Pandemic Resurrection: Making Gendered Citizenship Visible in a “Postfeminist” Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1