L’intelligence artificielle : un levier permettant de restaurer l’égalité ?

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS Canadian Journal of Bioethics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.7202/1089798ar
Jean-Pierre Béland
{"title":"L’intelligence artificielle : un levier permettant de restaurer l’égalité ?","authors":"Jean-Pierre Béland","doi":"10.7202/1089798ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The international conference \"Pour des intelligences artificielles au service du corps vulnerable : Les contreforts de l'ethique et du droit\" held in December 2021 at the Universite catholique de Lyon, in France, explored whether artificial intelligence (AI) be a lever to restore equality between poor and rich, women and men, the disabled, the elderly? In the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, this question is being asked everywhere, including various international bodies, such as the United Nations (UN) and the International Communications Union (ICU). This question requires an impact analysis (leverage) of AI that can generate more social justice (reduction of inequalities). How can we produce such an analysis so that AI can benefit everyone without excluding citizens from marginalized communities? The difficult ethical problem to solve is the following: how far does the impact of AI maximize justice by reducing inequalities? Here the analysis relies on knowledge of AI features that can have a real or negative impact. The purpose of this paper will be to show, based on our framework for analyzing technology impacts and various published texts, the strengths and weaknesses of AI, to answer this question. Applying this framework, we proceed as follows: 1) situate the complex problem of inequalities: those that are generational and socio-economic in nature to which AI has little impact;inequalities to which AI can have an impact, including digital inclusion and social inequalities;2) situate the terminology of AI: weak (algorithms) or complete (decisional and autonomous) AI;3) do an analysis of inequalities: digital inclusion and social inequalities showing the strengths and weaknesses of AI.","PeriodicalId":37334,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1089798ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The international conference "Pour des intelligences artificielles au service du corps vulnerable : Les contreforts de l'ethique et du droit" held in December 2021 at the Universite catholique de Lyon, in France, explored whether artificial intelligence (AI) be a lever to restore equality between poor and rich, women and men, the disabled, the elderly? In the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, this question is being asked everywhere, including various international bodies, such as the United Nations (UN) and the International Communications Union (ICU). This question requires an impact analysis (leverage) of AI that can generate more social justice (reduction of inequalities). How can we produce such an analysis so that AI can benefit everyone without excluding citizens from marginalized communities? The difficult ethical problem to solve is the following: how far does the impact of AI maximize justice by reducing inequalities? Here the analysis relies on knowledge of AI features that can have a real or negative impact. The purpose of this paper will be to show, based on our framework for analyzing technology impacts and various published texts, the strengths and weaknesses of AI, to answer this question. Applying this framework, we proceed as follows: 1) situate the complex problem of inequalities: those that are generational and socio-economic in nature to which AI has little impact;inequalities to which AI can have an impact, including digital inclusion and social inequalities;2) situate the terminology of AI: weak (algorithms) or complete (decisional and autonomous) AI;3) do an analysis of inequalities: digital inclusion and social inequalities showing the strengths and weaknesses of AI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能:恢复平等的杠杆?
2021年12月,在法国里昂天主教大学举行的国际会议“为弱势群体提供人工智能:为伦理和权利而努力”探讨了人工智能(AI)是否会成为恢复穷人与富人、男女、残疾人、老年人之间平等的杠杆?在新冠肺炎疫情大流行的背景下,包括联合国和国际传播联盟等各国际机构在内,世界各地都在问这个问题。这个问题需要对人工智能进行影响分析(杠杆),从而产生更多的社会正义(减少不平等)。我们如何进行这样的分析,使人工智能既能惠及所有人,又不会将边缘化社区的公民排除在外?要解决的困难伦理问题如下:人工智能的影响能在多大程度上通过减少不平等来最大化正义?在这里,分析依赖于可能产生真实或负面影响的AI功能的知识。本文的目的是根据我们分析技术影响和各种已发表文本的框架,展示人工智能的优势和劣势,以回答这个问题。应用这一框架,我们进行如下工作:1)定位不平等的复杂问题:那些人工智能几乎没有影响的代际和社会经济性质的不平等;人工智能可以产生影响的不平等,包括数字包容和社会不平等;2)定位人工智能的术语:弱(算法)或完整(决策和自主)人工智能;3)对不平等进行分析:数字包容和社会不平等,显示人工智能的优势和劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Bioethics
Canadian Journal of Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Developing a New Clinical Ethics Framework for Rehab: A Pre-Implementation Evaluation from the Perspective of Future Users De la pudeur dans les soins Migrating Metaphors: Why We Should Be Concerned About a ‘War on Mental Illness’ in the Aftermath of COVID-19 Bioéthique globale : une question d’aménagement du paysage social et intellectuel An Ethics-informed, Policy-based Approach to the Management of Challenges Posed by Living-at-Risk, Frequent Users of Emergency Departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1