Repérer et combattre le capacitisme, le sanisme et le suicidisme en santé

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS Canadian Journal of Bioethics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.7202/1094701ar
Marie-Josée Drolet
{"title":"Repérer et combattre le capacitisme, le sanisme et le suicidisme en santé","authors":"Marie-Josée Drolet","doi":"10.7202/1094701ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this critical commentary is to define, explain and illustrate three systems of belief and oppression that are generally not well known in the health field, but that are likely to have a negative influence on the practices of health and social service professionals as well as those of public or private health organizations, namely: ableism, sanism and suicidism. It also aims to identify certain courses of action that could help combat these systems, which are widespread in the institutions and organizations of our contemporary Western societies.","PeriodicalId":37334,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1094701ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this critical commentary is to define, explain and illustrate three systems of belief and oppression that are generally not well known in the health field, but that are likely to have a negative influence on the practices of health and social service professionals as well as those of public or private health organizations, namely: ableism, sanism and suicidism. It also aims to identify certain courses of action that could help combat these systems, which are widespread in the institutions and organizations of our contemporary Western societies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别和打击残疾、卫生和健康自杀
这篇批判性评论的目的是定义、解释和说明在卫生领域通常不为人所知的三种信仰和压迫体系,它们可能对卫生和社会服务专业人员以及公共或私人卫生组织的做法产生负面影响,即:残疾歧视、健康歧视和自杀主义。它还旨在确定有助于打击这些制度的某些行动方针,这些制度在当代西方社会的机构和组织中普遍存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Bioethics
Canadian Journal of Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Developing a New Clinical Ethics Framework for Rehab: A Pre-Implementation Evaluation from the Perspective of Future Users De la pudeur dans les soins Migrating Metaphors: Why We Should Be Concerned About a ‘War on Mental Illness’ in the Aftermath of COVID-19 Bioéthique globale : une question d’aménagement du paysage social et intellectuel An Ethics-informed, Policy-based Approach to the Management of Challenges Posed by Living-at-Risk, Frequent Users of Emergency Departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1