Cultural adaptation and assessment of validity evidence for scores obtained using a French version of the Tolerance of Ambiguity in Medical Students and Doctors scale

Baptiste Motte, G. Aiguier, Pauline Reumaux, Gérard Forzy, Anthony Piermattéo, G. Ficheux, Dominique Vanpee, J. Cobbaut
{"title":"Cultural adaptation and assessment of validity evidence for scores obtained using a French version of the Tolerance of Ambiguity in Medical Students and Doctors scale","authors":"Baptiste Motte, G. Aiguier, Pauline Reumaux, Gérard Forzy, Anthony Piermattéo, G. Ficheux, Dominique Vanpee, J. Cobbaut","doi":"10.7202/1095681ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preparing students to deal with and tolerate uncertainty or ambiguity is a major issue in medical education. There are many English-language scales to assess tolerance of uncertainty and ambiguity but no French-language scale has ever demonstrated validity evidence for its scores. We selected the Tolerance of Ambiguity in Medical Students And Doctors ( TAMSAD ) scale. Through a structured process, the original questionnaire was translated, culturally adapted, and assessed after being administered to a sampling of medical students. Test-retest reliability was verified by presenting the questionnaire to the students again after two months. The assessment of internal consistency revealed satisfactory value. Test-retest reliability is assessed by intraclass correlation that presents good reproducibility of scores obtained by students in first completion and second completion. These results indicate that the French version of the TAMSAD scale can be used to assess French medical students’ tolerance to ambiguity.","PeriodicalId":90014,"journal":{"name":"Mesure et evaluation en education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mesure et evaluation en education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1095681ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preparing students to deal with and tolerate uncertainty or ambiguity is a major issue in medical education. There are many English-language scales to assess tolerance of uncertainty and ambiguity but no French-language scale has ever demonstrated validity evidence for its scores. We selected the Tolerance of Ambiguity in Medical Students And Doctors ( TAMSAD ) scale. Through a structured process, the original questionnaire was translated, culturally adapted, and assessed after being administered to a sampling of medical students. Test-retest reliability was verified by presenting the questionnaire to the students again after two months. The assessment of internal consistency revealed satisfactory value. Test-retest reliability is assessed by intraclass correlation that presents good reproducibility of scores obtained by students in first completion and second completion. These results indicate that the French version of the TAMSAD scale can be used to assess French medical students’ tolerance to ambiguity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生和医生的歧义容忍度量表的法语版分数的文化适应和效度证据评估
培养学生处理和容忍不确定性或模糊性是医学教育中的一个主要问题。有许多英语量表来评估对不确定性和模糊性的容忍度,但没有法语量表证明其分数的有效性。我们选择了医学生和医生的歧义容忍度(TAMSAD)量表。通过一个结构化的过程,对原始问卷进行翻译、文化调整,并在对医科学生进行抽样调查后进行评估。2个月后再将问卷发放给学生,验证重测信度。内部一致性评价结果令人满意。测试-重测信度是通过班级内相关性来评估的,班级内相关性对学生在第一次完成和第二次完成时获得的分数具有良好的再现性。这些结果表明,法语版TAMSAD量表可以用来评估法国医学生对歧义的容忍度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contribution à l’évaluation de l’efficacité des dispositifs de remédiation Le palmarès des écoles secondaires en question Un goût de lire bien mesuré. Élaboration et mise à l’essai d’une échelle d’attitudes envers la lecture L’évaluation des innovations pédagogiques : quelles modalités de coopération entre les différents acteurs ? Évaluation des connaissances des patients diabétiques par les cartes conceptuelles : approche méthodologique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1