Theory and Practice of New Music in the Academic Courses of the Moscow State Conservatory

S. Savenko
{"title":"Theory and Practice of New Music in the Academic Courses of the Moscow State Conservatory","authors":"S. Savenko","doi":"10.6092/issn.2039-9715/5875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soviet cultural politics was completely determined in the 1930s and remained unchangeable almost until the collapse of the USSR (1991). Musical creativity was subject to the dictates of the strict ideological standards of socialist realism, which left no room for free artistic experimentation. This situation continued in more liberal times, which began after Stalin’s death. The development of the Russian post-war avant-garde began in the second half of the 1950s, with the first dodecaphonic work dating from 1956: Musica Stricta for piano by Andrei Volkonsky. The truly new works gradually penetrated into concert halls; new music became known and even popular among concertgoers, who perceived it as a symbol of spiritual freedom. All this had no relation yet to educational institutions and to teaching, which remained hopelessly conservative. The real institutional changes came only after the collapse of the USSR in the 1990s. Back then, there were three main directions associated with new music: first of all, the establishment of new composers’ associations, such as the Association of Modern Music and the Centre for Contemporary Music; secondly, festivals of contemporary music, such as the festival Moscow Autumn and the annual international festival of contemporary music Moscow Forum ; thirdly, the performing collectives connected to them, such as the ensemble Studio for New Music. These institutions were established in the Moscow State “Tchaikovsky” Conservatory, and therefore played a crucial role in the formation of new teaching principles for contemporary music.","PeriodicalId":30273,"journal":{"name":"Musica Docta","volume":"5 1","pages":"87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musica Docta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2039-9715/5875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soviet cultural politics was completely determined in the 1930s and remained unchangeable almost until the collapse of the USSR (1991). Musical creativity was subject to the dictates of the strict ideological standards of socialist realism, which left no room for free artistic experimentation. This situation continued in more liberal times, which began after Stalin’s death. The development of the Russian post-war avant-garde began in the second half of the 1950s, with the first dodecaphonic work dating from 1956: Musica Stricta for piano by Andrei Volkonsky. The truly new works gradually penetrated into concert halls; new music became known and even popular among concertgoers, who perceived it as a symbol of spiritual freedom. All this had no relation yet to educational institutions and to teaching, which remained hopelessly conservative. The real institutional changes came only after the collapse of the USSR in the 1990s. Back then, there were three main directions associated with new music: first of all, the establishment of new composers’ associations, such as the Association of Modern Music and the Centre for Contemporary Music; secondly, festivals of contemporary music, such as the festival Moscow Autumn and the annual international festival of contemporary music Moscow Forum ; thirdly, the performing collectives connected to them, such as the ensemble Studio for New Music. These institutions were established in the Moscow State “Tchaikovsky” Conservatory, and therefore played a crucial role in the formation of new teaching principles for contemporary music.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莫斯科国立音乐学院学术课程中的新音乐理论与实践
苏联的文化政治在20世纪30年代就完全确定了,几乎一直保持不变,直到苏联解体(1991)。音乐创作受到社会主义现实主义严格的意识形态标准的支配,这给自由的艺术实验留下了空间。这种情况在斯大林死后开始的更加自由的时代继续存在。俄罗斯战后先锋派的发展始于20世纪50年代后半期,第一部十二声部作品可以追溯到1956年:安德烈·沃尔孔斯基(Andrei Volkonsky)的钢琴《严格音乐》(Musica Stricta)。真正的新作品逐渐进入音乐厅;新音乐在音乐会观众中广为人知,甚至广受欢迎,他们将其视为精神自由的象征。所有这一切都与教育机构和教学毫无关系,因为教育机构和教学仍然无可救药地保守。真正的制度变革是在上世纪90年代苏联解体之后才出现的。当时,与新音乐相关的主要方向有三个:首先,建立新作曲家协会,如现代音乐协会和当代音乐中心;其次是当代音乐节,如莫斯科秋季音乐节和一年一度的国际当代音乐节莫斯科论坛;第三,与他们相联系的表演集体,如新音乐工作室合奏。这些机构成立于莫斯科国立柴可夫斯基音乐学院,因此在当代音乐新教学原则的形成中发挥了至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Spiegare le note e il tempo con le parole. Appunti per una tipologia della recensione musicale in Italia Università e conoscenze: le relazioni fruttuose Un percorso didattico sul “Rigoletto” di Verdi: «La donna è mobile» e la voce come fantasma Tradurre in parole Beethoven: la Sonata per pianoforte in Re minore op. 31 n. 2 “La Tempesta” Paolo De Matteis, Musica e gesto nel teatro mozartiano. Le didascalie musicali nelle “Nozze di Figaro” , Lucca, LIM, 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1