Outcomes of Open Appendicectomy by Simple Ligation versus Invagination in Acute Appendicitis- A Prospective Observational Study

K. Kiran, A. Ramani, S. Math
{"title":"Outcomes of Open Appendicectomy by Simple Ligation versus Invagination in Acute Appendicitis- A Prospective Observational Study","authors":"K. Kiran, A. Ramani, S. Math","doi":"10.7860/ijars/2023/59856.2871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Surgical techniques in open appendicectomy has been evolving with most centers following simple ligation of appendix stump as the most preferred approach including the laparoscopic approach. Invagination of stump of the appendix is also practiced as a traditional approach. Aim: To compare and evaluate the outcomes and postoperative morbidity of simple ligation and invagination appendicectomy techniques. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted from October 2016 to July 2018 and included a total of 100 patients of acute appendicitis undergoing emergency open appendectomy surgery. The method of surgery of simple ligation and invagination appendectomy was allotted alternatively with 50 patients in each category. Both techniques of surgery were compared in terms of operating time, duration of hospital stay and postsurgical complications. Relevant data was collected and entered in Microsoft excel and p-value was calculated using Chi-square test. Results: A total of 100 patients were included with a mean age of 27 years. Both the groups with 50 patients each, were equivalent with age and gender distribution. It was observed that both the techniques had similar outcomes in respect to mean duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay and morbidities (p-value>0.05) with no statistically significant difference. The morbidity and the rate of postoperative complications were similar in both the groups. Conclusion: Appendicular stump management after appendectomy can be treated either by simple ligation or by invagination method, both techniques being equally effective and safe. Hence, it is surgeons preference to choose among the two techniques.","PeriodicalId":56235,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijars/2023/59856.2871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical techniques in open appendicectomy has been evolving with most centers following simple ligation of appendix stump as the most preferred approach including the laparoscopic approach. Invagination of stump of the appendix is also practiced as a traditional approach. Aim: To compare and evaluate the outcomes and postoperative morbidity of simple ligation and invagination appendicectomy techniques. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted from October 2016 to July 2018 and included a total of 100 patients of acute appendicitis undergoing emergency open appendectomy surgery. The method of surgery of simple ligation and invagination appendectomy was allotted alternatively with 50 patients in each category. Both techniques of surgery were compared in terms of operating time, duration of hospital stay and postsurgical complications. Relevant data was collected and entered in Microsoft excel and p-value was calculated using Chi-square test. Results: A total of 100 patients were included with a mean age of 27 years. Both the groups with 50 patients each, were equivalent with age and gender distribution. It was observed that both the techniques had similar outcomes in respect to mean duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay and morbidities (p-value>0.05) with no statistically significant difference. The morbidity and the rate of postoperative complications were similar in both the groups. Conclusion: Appendicular stump management after appendectomy can be treated either by simple ligation or by invagination method, both techniques being equally effective and safe. Hence, it is surgeons preference to choose among the two techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项前瞻性观察研究:单纯结扎开放式阑尾切除术与内陷术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效
前言:开放性阑尾切除术的手术技术一直在发展,大多数中心采用简单的阑尾残端结扎作为最首选的方法,包括腹腔镜方法。阑尾残端内陷也是一种传统的方法。目的:比较和评价单纯结扎和内陷阑尾切除术的效果和术后发病率。材料与方法:本研究是一项前瞻性观察性研究,于2016年10月至2018年7月进行,共纳入100例急性阑尾炎急诊开放阑尾切除术患者。选择单纯结扎和内陷阑尾切除术两种手术方式,每组50例。比较两种手术方式的手术时间、住院时间和术后并发症。收集相关数据并在Microsoft excel中录入,采用卡方检验计算p值。结果:共纳入100例患者,平均年龄27岁。两组各有50名患者,年龄和性别分布相同。观察到两种技术在平均手术时间、住院时间和发病率方面的结果相似(p值bb0 0.05),差异无统计学意义。两组的发病率和术后并发症发生率相似。结论:阑尾切除术后阑尾残端处理既可采用简单结扎法,也可采用内陷法,两种方法均有效且安全。因此,外科医生倾向于在两种技术中选择一种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tibial Periosteal Ganglion Cyst: A Rare Case of Non Traumatic Leg Swelling Mylohyoid Bridging of the Mandible and its Clinical Importance in Dry Mandibles: A Cross-sectional Study Accuracy of Ultrasound Imaging Findings in Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses: A Cross-sectional Study Morphometric Study of Different Orbital Dimensions in Dry Skull in Eastern India- A Cross-sectional Study Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography by Fungal Sinusitis: A Case-control Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1