Bolzano über Willensfreiheit

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.5771/0031-8183-2015-2-304
A. Krause
{"title":"Bolzano über Willensfreiheit","authors":"A. Krause","doi":"10.5771/0031-8183-2015-2-304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In his Athanasia, the main source of his metaphysics, Bolzano deals with the problem of the freedom of the human will. This paper reconstructs two definitions of free will and focuses on Bolzano’s arguments and counter-arguments for and against the existence of free will. These arguments are confronted with some aspects of the modern discussion of this subject. The paper examines especially how far the so called principle of alternate possibilities is relevant for a better understanding of Bolzano’s arguments. Assuming the reconstructed definitions of the freedom of the will, it turns out that a person has only free will if this person could have wanted otherwise. But, according to Bolzano’s view in the Athanasia, the possibility to want otherwise is not a necessary condition for moral responsibility. Finally, the paper shortly discusses whether, for Bolzano, people are free after death and whether God is free.","PeriodicalId":42095,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0031-8183-2015-2-304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. In his Athanasia, the main source of his metaphysics, Bolzano deals with the problem of the freedom of the human will. This paper reconstructs two definitions of free will and focuses on Bolzano’s arguments and counter-arguments for and against the existence of free will. These arguments are confronted with some aspects of the modern discussion of this subject. The paper examines especially how far the so called principle of alternate possibilities is relevant for a better understanding of Bolzano’s arguments. Assuming the reconstructed definitions of the freedom of the will, it turns out that a person has only free will if this person could have wanted otherwise. But, according to Bolzano’s view in the Athanasia, the possibility to want otherwise is not a necessary condition for moral responsibility. Finally, the paper shortly discusses whether, for Bolzano, people are free after death and whether God is free.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波尔扎诺的自由意志
摘要在他的形而上学的主要来源——《阿塔那西亚》中,博尔扎诺探讨了人类意志自由的问题。本文重构了自由意志的两种定义,重点讨论了博尔扎诺支持和反对自由意志存在的论证和反论证。这些论点遇到了这个主题的现代讨论的某些方面。这篇论文特别研究了所谓的交替可能性原则在多大程度上与更好地理解博尔扎诺的论点有关。假设意志自由的重构定义,结果是一个人只有在他想要的情况下才有自由意志。但是,根据博尔扎诺在《阿他那西亚》中的观点,想要另一种可能性并不是道德责任的必要条件。最后,本文简要讨论了Bolzano认为人死后是否自由以及上帝是否自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Rainer Enskat, Urteil und Erfahrung. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Zweiter Teil The information society: cause for a philosophical paradigm shift? A response to Luciano Floridi Out of the Box – into the Green and the Blue. Comments on a Post-humanist Information Society Reflections on Floridi’s “The Green and the Blue: A New Political Ontology for a Mature Information Society” Are philosophical questions open? Some thoughts about Luciano Floridi’s conception of philosophy as conceptual design and his new political ontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1