PRICE VS QUANTITY IN A DUOPOLY WITH TECHNOLOGICAL SPILLOVERS: A WELFARE RE-APPRAISAL

L. Lambertini, A. Mantovani
{"title":"PRICE VS QUANTITY IN A DUOPOLY WITH TECHNOLOGICAL SPILLOVERS: A WELFARE RE-APPRAISAL","authors":"L. Lambertini, A. Mantovani","doi":"10.6092/UNIBO/AMSACTA/685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyse the problem of the choice of the market variable in a model where firms activate RD and (ii) there exists a set of the relevant parameters where a benevolent social planner prefers quantity setting to price setting. This happens when the marginal cost of R&D activities is relatively low while technological externalities are relatively high. In this situation, the conflict between social and private preferences over the type of market behaviour disappears.","PeriodicalId":85052,"journal":{"name":"Keio economic studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"41-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Keio economic studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/UNIBO/AMSACTA/685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We analyse the problem of the choice of the market variable in a model where firms activate RD and (ii) there exists a set of the relevant parameters where a benevolent social planner prefers quantity setting to price setting. This happens when the marginal cost of R&D activities is relatively low while technological externalities are relatively high. In this situation, the conflict between social and private preferences over the type of market behaviour disappears.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有技术溢出的双头垄断中的价格vs数量:福利重新评估
我们在企业激活研发的模型中分析了市场变量的选择问题,并且(ii)存在一组相关参数,其中仁慈的社会计划者更喜欢数量设定而不是价格设定。当研发活动的边际成本相对较低而技术外部性相对较高时,就会发生这种情况。在这种情况下,社会偏好和个人偏好之间对市场行为类型的冲突就消失了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface by the Editors THE WELFARE GAINS FROM INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION Trade and Welfare in General Equilibrium Domestic Distortions and the Theory of Tariffs Tariffs and the Transfer Problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1