Doctrina de connotatis v barokně-scholastické diskusi

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2016-11-01 DOI:10.5840/studneoar201613611
L. Novák
{"title":"Doctrina de connotatis v barokně-scholastické diskusi","authors":"L. Novák","doi":"10.5840/studneoar201613611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the Doctrina de Connotatis as Discussed in Baroque Scholasticism In Baroque scholasticism the medieval semantic theory of connotation as a property of terms, originally elaborated by Ockham and others, received an ontological application or re-interpretation in the context of the theory of relations. The main proponent of this ontologized “doctrina de connotatis” seems to have been Suárez. Subsequently, this doctrine was severely criticised by the Jesuits Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza and Rodrigo de Arriaga, but also by the “princeps Scotistarum” Bartholomeo Mastri; whereas another Scotist, John Punch, adopted a theory of relations close to this doctrine. The fates of the original semantic theory of connotation, the ontologized “doctrina de connotatis” and the broader context of the relevant discussions (especially the new res–modus ontology established around 1600) document the complexity of the history of scholastic ideas, irreducible to any simple paradigm (like that of the realism–nominalism strife).","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"13 1","pages":"105-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5840/studneoar201613611","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Neoaristotelica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar201613611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the Doctrina de Connotatis as Discussed in Baroque Scholasticism In Baroque scholasticism the medieval semantic theory of connotation as a property of terms, originally elaborated by Ockham and others, received an ontological application or re-interpretation in the context of the theory of relations. The main proponent of this ontologized “doctrina de connotatis” seems to have been Suárez. Subsequently, this doctrine was severely criticised by the Jesuits Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza and Rodrigo de Arriaga, but also by the “princeps Scotistarum” Bartholomeo Mastri; whereas another Scotist, John Punch, adopted a theory of relations close to this doctrine. The fates of the original semantic theory of connotation, the ontologized “doctrina de connotatis” and the broader context of the relevant discussions (especially the new res–modus ontology established around 1600) document the complexity of the history of scholastic ideas, irreducible to any simple paradigm (like that of the realism–nominalism strife).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴洛克学术讨论中的内涵论
在巴洛克经院哲学中,最初由奥卡姆等人阐述的中世纪语义学内涵理论作为术语的属性,在关系理论的背景下得到了本体论的应用或重新解释。这种本体论化的“内涵论”的主要支持者似乎是Suárez。随后,这一学说受到了耶稣会士佩德罗·乌尔塔多·德·门多萨和罗德里戈·德·阿里加的严厉批评,也受到了“Scotistarum校长”巴塞洛梅奥·马斯特里的严厉批评;而另一位苏格兰人约翰·潘趣则采用了一种与此学说接近的关系理论。原始语义内涵理论的命运、本体论化的“内涵论”(doctrina de connotatis)以及相关讨论的更广泛背景(尤其是1600年左右建立的新的非模本体论)记录了学术思想史的复杂性,无法简化为任何简单的范式(如现实主义-唯名论之争)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Neoaristotelica
Studia Neoaristotelica Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Studia Neoaristotelica is a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal devoted to the promotion of Aristotelian philosophy broadly conceived, drawing on the rich legacy of the scholastic tradition and contemporary analytical metaphysics. Special emphasis is placed on the most advanced forms of scholastic thought that emerged during the Renaissance and Baroque periods. Our vision is to work toward a philosophical synthesis of analytic and scholastic methods and ideas, providing a contribution to Christian philosophy as well as wider secular thought. The journal is published by Editiones Scholasticae and the University of South Bohemia Faculty of Theology.
期刊最新文献
Leonardo da Vinci’s Aphorism on the Aristotle-Alexander Legend: Sources, Meaning, And Its Reception by Francis Bacon Meeting Harman’s Challenge Zavádění předmětů v aristotelismu Být v či nebýt v? Filomathés čili o odbornosti
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1