The Differences in Renal Hemodynamics and Plasma Catecholamine Levels between Cirrhotic Patients with and without Ascites

Q4 Medicine 胃肠病学 Pub Date : 1993-09-01 DOI:10.6557/GJTA.199309_10(3).0002
Ting Chang, P. Hsu, N. Chiu, W. Yao, Juei-Tang Cheng, C. Peng, T. Liou, Ching‐Yih Lin, Xi-Zhang Lin, Jeng‐Shiann Shin
{"title":"The Differences in Renal Hemodynamics and Plasma Catecholamine Levels between Cirrhotic Patients with and without Ascites","authors":"Ting Chang, P. Hsu, N. Chiu, W. Yao, Juei-Tang Cheng, C. Peng, T. Liou, Ching‐Yih Lin, Xi-Zhang Lin, Jeng‐Shiann Shin","doi":"10.6557/GJTA.199309_10(3).0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From February 1991 to February 1992, we performed the prospective study to investigate the differences in renal hemodynamics and plasma catecholamine concentrations between cirrhotic patients with ascites and without ascites. Eleven cirrhotic patients without ascites (10 male, 1 female; mean age: 50 ± 11 years old) and 17 cirrhotic patients with ascites (14 male, 3 female; mean age: 52±11 years old) were enrolled for measurement of renal blood flow (RBF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), plasma concentrations of norepinephrine (NE), and epinephrine (EP). The data were assessed by Student's t-test. Results showed that the cirrhotics with ascites had significantly lower RBF, GFR and higher plasma NE concentration than the ones without ascites (364±142 vs. 465±123 ml/min, p<0.05; 68.7±26.0 vs. 87.9±18.1 ml/min/1.73m^2, p<0.05; 146±39 vs. 105±47pg/ml, p<0.05 respectively), but there was no significant difference in plasma concentration of EP (45.1±16.3 vs. 61.5±38.0 pg/ml, p>0.05) in the two groups of patients. Considering all cirrhotic patients together (N=28), RBF was significantly correlated with GFR (r=0.6634, p<0.001), but it was not inversely correlated with the plasma concentration of NE (r=0.0789; p >0.05). We concluded that (1) cirrhotic patients with ascites had lower RBF and higher plasma concentration of NE than the ones without ascites, and (2) the decrease of RBF might be a major factor influencing the impairment of GFR in decompensated cirrhotics.","PeriodicalId":10003,"journal":{"name":"胃肠病学","volume":"10 1","pages":"204-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"胃肠病学","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6557/GJTA.199309_10(3).0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From February 1991 to February 1992, we performed the prospective study to investigate the differences in renal hemodynamics and plasma catecholamine concentrations between cirrhotic patients with ascites and without ascites. Eleven cirrhotic patients without ascites (10 male, 1 female; mean age: 50 ± 11 years old) and 17 cirrhotic patients with ascites (14 male, 3 female; mean age: 52±11 years old) were enrolled for measurement of renal blood flow (RBF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), plasma concentrations of norepinephrine (NE), and epinephrine (EP). The data were assessed by Student's t-test. Results showed that the cirrhotics with ascites had significantly lower RBF, GFR and higher plasma NE concentration than the ones without ascites (364±142 vs. 465±123 ml/min, p<0.05; 68.7±26.0 vs. 87.9±18.1 ml/min/1.73m^2, p<0.05; 146±39 vs. 105±47pg/ml, p<0.05 respectively), but there was no significant difference in plasma concentration of EP (45.1±16.3 vs. 61.5±38.0 pg/ml, p>0.05) in the two groups of patients. Considering all cirrhotic patients together (N=28), RBF was significantly correlated with GFR (r=0.6634, p<0.001), but it was not inversely correlated with the plasma concentration of NE (r=0.0789; p >0.05). We concluded that (1) cirrhotic patients with ascites had lower RBF and higher plasma concentration of NE than the ones without ascites, and (2) the decrease of RBF might be a major factor influencing the impairment of GFR in decompensated cirrhotics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝硬化伴与不伴腹水患者肾血流动力学及血浆儿茶酚胺水平的差异
从1991年2月到1992年2月,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,调查肝硬化合并腹水和无腹水患者肾脏血流动力学和血浆儿茶酚胺浓度的差异。11例无腹水的肝硬化患者(男10例,女1例;平均年龄:50±11岁),17例肝硬化伴腹水患者(男14例,女3例;平均年龄:52±11岁),测量肾血流量(RBF)、肾小球滤过率(GFR)、血浆去甲肾上腺素(NE)、肾上腺素(EP)浓度。数据采用学生t检验进行评估。结果显示,肝硬化合并腹水组RBF、GFR显著低于无腹水组(364±142 vs 465±123 ml/min, p<0.05);68.7±26.0 vs. 87.9±18.1 ml/min/1.73 3m^2, p<0.05;两组患者血浆EP浓度(45.1±16.3∶61.5±38.0 pg/ml, p<0.05)差异无统计学意义(p<0.05)。综合考虑所有肝硬化患者(N=28), RBF与GFR显著相关(r=0.6634, p<0.001),但与血浆NE浓度无负相关(r=0.0789;p > 0.05)。我们认为(1)肝硬化合并腹水患者的RBF低于无腹水患者,血浆NE浓度高于无腹水患者;(2)RBF降低可能是影响失代偿期肝硬化患者GFR受损的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
胃肠病学
胃肠病学 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4567
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology is an academic journal sponsored by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. It mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and comments in this field. The journal was founded in 1996 and is included in well-known databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences) and Statistical Source Journal (China's Excellent Science and Technology Papers Journal). It is one of the national key academic journals under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education. Gastroenterology enjoys a high reputation and influence in the academic community. The articles published in this journal have a high academic level and practical value, providing readers with more actual cases and industry information, and have received widespread attention and citations from readers.
期刊最新文献
白细胞介素-23 p19 RNA干扰对结肠炎小鼠模型的治疗作用 Levels and Significance of Serum Macrophage Polarization-related Cytokines in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Role of epidermal growth factor and its receptor in regulating proliferation of colon cancer stem cells Colonoscopy and histology in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease Expressions and significance of estrogen receptor and adaptor protein p66Shc in colon cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1