Comparison of the impacts of different multimodalities on incidental l2 vocabulary learning

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS MODERNA SPRAK Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.58221/mosp.v114i2.7405

A. Çekiç, Mehmet Demirezen

{"title":"Comparison of the impacts of different multimodalities on incidental l2 vocabulary learning","authors":"A. Çekiç, Mehmet Demirezen","doi":"10.58221/mosp.v114i2.7405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nMultimodality of input in incidental L2 vocabulary learning has recently been a topic of interest among language acquisition researchers, yet the results have been somewhat contradictory. This study seeks to compare the impacts of two different multimodalities on incidental L2 vocabulary learning, namely, reading-plus-watching (experimental group I) vs. reading-plus-listening (experimental group II), as compared to the reading only condition, which is included as a control measure. Experimental group I watched and read the transcriptions of four news texts with electronic glosses for the target words, while experimental group II read and listened to the same news texts again with electronic glosses for the same 20 target words. Next, the two experimental groups swapped roles with a new set of four news texts glossed for another group of 20 target words. The control group only read the same eight news texts without glosses. The results suggest that reading-plus-listening can be a more conducive multimodal presentation for incidental vocabulary learning as compared to reading-plus-watching. The results also challenge the validity of some principles of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning in incidental L2 vocabulary learning, while providing supporting evidence for some other principles. \n","PeriodicalId":41279,"journal":{"name":"MODERNA SPRAK","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERNA SPRAK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58221/mosp.v114i2.7405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Multimodality of input in incidental L2 vocabulary learning has recently been a topic of interest among language acquisition researchers, yet the results have been somewhat contradictory. This study seeks to compare the impacts of two different multimodalities on incidental L2 vocabulary learning, namely, reading-plus-watching (experimental group I) vs. reading-plus-listening (experimental group II), as compared to the reading only condition, which is included as a control measure. Experimental group I watched and read the transcriptions of four news texts with electronic glosses for the target words, while experimental group II read and listened to the same news texts again with electronic glosses for the same 20 target words. Next, the two experimental groups swapped roles with a new set of four news texts glossed for another group of 20 target words. The control group only read the same eight news texts without glosses. The results suggest that reading-plus-listening can be a more conducive multimodal presentation for incidental vocabulary learning as compared to reading-plus-watching. The results also challenge the validity of some principles of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning in incidental L2 vocabulary learning, while providing supporting evidence for some other principles.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

不同多模式对二语附带词汇学习的影响比较

二语附带词汇学习中的多模态输入是近年来语言习得研究者关注的一个话题，但研究结果却有些矛盾。本研究旨在比较两种不同的多模式对附带二语词汇学习的影响，即阅读加观看(实验一组)和阅读加听力(实验二组)，与仅阅读条件(作为对照措施)相比。实验组一观看和朗读四篇新闻文本的电子注释，并对目标单词进行注释;实验组二再次阅读和听同一篇新闻文本，并对相同的20个目标单词进行注释。接下来，两个实验组交换角色，用一组新的四篇新闻文本为另一组20个目标单词进行修饰。对照组只阅读同样的八篇不加注释的新闻文本。结果表明，与阅读+观看相比，阅读+听力是一种更有利于附带词汇学习的多模式呈现方式。研究结果也对多媒体学习认知理论在附带词汇学习中的有效性提出了挑战，同时为其他一些原则提供了支持证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

MODERNA SPRAK Multiple-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： It is a pleasure to be able to welcome you to web-based Moderna språk, the journal of English, French, German and Spanish languages, literatures and cultures! Moderna språk has been published every year since 1906, and it is thus one of the oldest journals of its kind in the world. Until 2008, Moderna språk came out in a printed version, but from 2009 it is published as a web-based journal on the Internet. Our aim is to publish all articles from 1906 and onwards electronically, by gradual stages. The articles in Moderna språk cover areas within linguistics, literature and culture and the main target group is language teachers and researchers at schools and universities worldwide. The publication is peer-reviewed.