Testing the Spirits

Trevor Eppeheimer
{"title":"Testing the Spirits","authors":"Trevor Eppeheimer","doi":"10.7916/D8319V6R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because I know that Christopher Morse is no fan of indulgent tributes or excessive sentimentality, I will keep these introductory remarks brief and restrained, except to say that learning from, working with, and befriending him have profoundly shaped me, both as a teacher of Christian theology and a person. At present my students at Hood Theological Seminary helpfully receive much of his wisdom and insights into the discipline of “dogmatic theology” through his influence on my thinking and approach to the same. I first met Christopher Morse at Yale Divinity School while enrolled in an excellent course he offered there in spring 1997 on twentieth century Christian theology. Two years later I entered the doctoral program at Union Theological Seminary as his student in systematic theology, completing my dissertation under his helpful direction in 2006. He married my wife and me in 2003 and today my two children, Nicholas and Grace, refer to him affectionately as “Uncle Kit.” I have read his excellent, one volume Christian dogmatics, Not Every Spirit: A Dogmatics of Christian Disbelief, well over twenty times, cover-to-cover. Although it is commonly recognized to be in the “canon” of recent introductions to Christian theology, there remains in that book a treasure trove of insights and methodological ingenuities that wait patiently for other theologians to encounter and critically engage in print. One of these is the vision of theological education Christopher puts forward in Not Every Spirit’s first three chapters. After being tasked to deliver the 2014 Closing Convocation address at Hood Theological Seminary, I decided to use the occasion to present that vision to the Seminary community the night before graduation exercises. What follows is the text of that address, given May 16, 2014.","PeriodicalId":83394,"journal":{"name":"Union Seminary quarterly review","volume":"65 1","pages":"10-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Union Seminary quarterly review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8319V6R","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because I know that Christopher Morse is no fan of indulgent tributes or excessive sentimentality, I will keep these introductory remarks brief and restrained, except to say that learning from, working with, and befriending him have profoundly shaped me, both as a teacher of Christian theology and a person. At present my students at Hood Theological Seminary helpfully receive much of his wisdom and insights into the discipline of “dogmatic theology” through his influence on my thinking and approach to the same. I first met Christopher Morse at Yale Divinity School while enrolled in an excellent course he offered there in spring 1997 on twentieth century Christian theology. Two years later I entered the doctoral program at Union Theological Seminary as his student in systematic theology, completing my dissertation under his helpful direction in 2006. He married my wife and me in 2003 and today my two children, Nicholas and Grace, refer to him affectionately as “Uncle Kit.” I have read his excellent, one volume Christian dogmatics, Not Every Spirit: A Dogmatics of Christian Disbelief, well over twenty times, cover-to-cover. Although it is commonly recognized to be in the “canon” of recent introductions to Christian theology, there remains in that book a treasure trove of insights and methodological ingenuities that wait patiently for other theologians to encounter and critically engage in print. One of these is the vision of theological education Christopher puts forward in Not Every Spirit’s first three chapters. After being tasked to deliver the 2014 Closing Convocation address at Hood Theological Seminary, I decided to use the occasion to present that vision to the Seminary community the night before graduation exercises. What follows is the text of that address, given May 16, 2014.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试酒
因为我知道克里斯托弗·莫尔斯不喜欢过分的赞扬或过度的感伤,所以我将把这些介绍保持简短和克制,除了说,从他那里学习,与他一起工作,成为朋友,深刻地影响了我,无论是作为一个基督教神学老师还是一个人。目前,我在胡德神学院的学生通过他对我的思想和方法的影响,在“教条神学”这门学科上获得了他的许多智慧和见解。我第一次见到克里斯托弗·莫尔斯是在耶鲁神学院,当时我参加了他1997年春季开设的一门关于20世纪基督教神学的优秀课程。两年后,我作为他的系统神学学生进入联合神学院攻读博士学位,并于2006年在他的帮助下完成了我的论文。2003年,他主持了我和妻子的婚礼。今天,我的两个孩子尼古拉斯和格蕾丝都亲切地称他为“基特叔叔”。我读过他的优秀的,一卷的基督教教义,不是每一种精神:基督教不相信的教条,超过二十遍,从头到尾。虽然它被普遍认为是最近介绍基督教神学的“正典”,但在这本书中仍然有一个宝贵的见解和方法论上的独创性,耐心地等待着其他神学家去遇到和批判性地参与印刷。其中之一就是克里斯托弗在《不是每一个灵》的前三章中提出的神学教育的异象。在接受胡德神学院2014年毕业典礼闭幕演讲的任务后,我决定利用这个机会在毕业典礼的前一天晚上向神学院的社区展示我的愿景。以下是2014年5月16日的讲话全文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Strange Worlds of Apocalyptic, Christian Ethics, and Princeton Theological Seminary The Humanity of Divinity Jesus and the Divine Name Testing the Spirits Apophasis and the Trinity: On the Enduring Significance of Revelation for Theology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1