Jump Rope Training for Health and Fitness in School-age Participants: Secondary Analyses from a Systematic Review

Ekaitz Dudagoitia Barrio, C. Álvarez, R. Thapa, A. Ramachandran, Utkarsh Singh, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
{"title":"Jump Rope Training for Health and Fitness in School-age Participants: Secondary Analyses from a Systematic Review","authors":"Ekaitz Dudagoitia Barrio, C. Álvarez, R. Thapa, A. Ramachandran, Utkarsh Singh, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo","doi":"10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.11n.1p.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Altering moderator variables during a jump rope training (JRT) program can provide a novel training modification that can be used to modify the specific training outcomes. JRT is commonly implemented as a traditional game activity in many countries as an old culture of physical activity in school-age participants (SAP). However, strength and conditioning professionals need to know how JRT moderator variables affect these health- and physical fitness outcomes. Thus, an evidence-gap map (EGM) could provides a clearer picture of the design of an appropriate JRT based on scientific evidence. Objective: the purpose of this systematic review secondary analysis was to assess the moderator variables related to JRT effectiveness for health and physical fitness-related outcomes in SAP. Method: literature searches were conducted in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS. The PICOS (participants, intervention, comparators, outcomes, and study design) approach was used to rate studies for eligibility. An EGM was constructed to graphically represent the body of evidence and the current research gaps. Results: 10,546 records were initially identified and finally, 8 studies were considered. A total of 186 participants were analysed in the intervention groups (16 groups). Five of Eight studies measured health-related parameters and five of eight included fitness-related parameters. Conclusion: rope weight (e.g., weighted rope i.e. 695 g), adequate post-exercise recovery strategies (e.g., dark chocolate supplementation), type of jump (e.g., freestyle), and total number of jumps, can be","PeriodicalId":36327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.11n.1p.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Altering moderator variables during a jump rope training (JRT) program can provide a novel training modification that can be used to modify the specific training outcomes. JRT is commonly implemented as a traditional game activity in many countries as an old culture of physical activity in school-age participants (SAP). However, strength and conditioning professionals need to know how JRT moderator variables affect these health- and physical fitness outcomes. Thus, an evidence-gap map (EGM) could provides a clearer picture of the design of an appropriate JRT based on scientific evidence. Objective: the purpose of this systematic review secondary analysis was to assess the moderator variables related to JRT effectiveness for health and physical fitness-related outcomes in SAP. Method: literature searches were conducted in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS. The PICOS (participants, intervention, comparators, outcomes, and study design) approach was used to rate studies for eligibility. An EGM was constructed to graphically represent the body of evidence and the current research gaps. Results: 10,546 records were initially identified and finally, 8 studies were considered. A total of 186 participants were analysed in the intervention groups (16 groups). Five of Eight studies measured health-related parameters and five of eight included fitness-related parameters. Conclusion: rope weight (e.g., weighted rope i.e. 695 g), adequate post-exercise recovery strategies (e.g., dark chocolate supplementation), type of jump (e.g., freestyle), and total number of jumps, can be
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跳绳训练对学龄参与者健康和体能的影响:来自系统回顾的二次分析
背景:在跳绳训练(JRT)计划中改变调节变量可以提供一种新的训练修改,可以用来修改特定的训练结果。在许多国家,JRT通常作为一种传统的游戏活动来实施,作为学龄参与者(SAP)的一种古老的体育活动文化。然而,力量和调节专业人员需要知道JRT调节变量如何影响这些健康和身体健康结果。因此,证据缺口图(EGM)可以为基于科学证据的适当JRT的设计提供更清晰的画面。目的:本系统评价二次分析的目的是评估与JRT在SAP中对健康和身体健康相关结果的有效性相关的调节变量。方法:在PubMed、Web of Science和SCOPUS电子数据库中进行文献检索。PICOS(参与者、干预措施、比较者、结果和研究设计)方法用于评估研究的合格性。构建了一个EGM,以图形方式表示证据体和当前的研究差距。结果:最初确定了10,546条记录,最终纳入了8项研究。干预组(16组)共186名参与者进行了分析。八项研究中有五项测量了与健康相关的参数,八项研究中有五项包括了与健康相关的参数。结论:绳子的重量(例如,加权绳子,即695克),适当的运动后恢复策略(例如,黑巧克力补充),跳跃类型(例如,自由式)和总跳跃次数,可以
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science
International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Multiple Hop Test Kinematics Between Force-Platforms and Video Footage – A Cross Sectional Study Home-Based Pilates Exercise Regimen Can Alter the Balance and Trunk Mobility of Non-Exercising Middle-Aged Women: A Pilot Study A Potential Screening Tool for Nutritional Preparedness in Collegiate Level Female Athletes: A Pilot study Impact of Stretching Exercises on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review Front Crawl and Backstroke Sprint Swimming have Distinct Differences along with Similar Patterns Regarding Trunk Rotations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1