Youth Conceptualizations of Evil and Implications for Social Studies Education

Q4 Social Sciences Alberta Journal of Educational Research Pub Date : 2014-12-18 DOI:10.7939/R39S1KW52
C. V. Kessel, K. Heyer
{"title":"Youth Conceptualizations of Evil and Implications for Social Studies Education","authors":"C. V. Kessel, K. Heyer","doi":"10.7939/R39S1KW52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is crucial that social studies research attempt to understand students’ conceptualizations of evil because a longstanding societal issue is politicians furthering their agenda through the exploitation of the semantic impact of “evil” (Dews, 2008). If social studies teachers are informed about youth conceptualizations of evil, they might approach curriculum in a more meaningful and critical way, particularly contemporary events. George W. Bush infamously used the phrase “axis of evil” as a rallying cry for the United States’ war in Iraq (Bush, 2002) and more recently Stephen Harper has dubbed Iran as evil and also linked Nazism, MarxistLeninism, and terrorism together as reinventions of a similar evil that seeks to destroy “human liberty” (Marsden, 2012; Perkel, 2014). Evil is a familiar social signifier in politics and popular culture, but it is rarely defined or discussed. Yet, students’ nascent understanding of evil informs how they interpret historical and current events and whether they see such events as inevitable, thus affecting their sense of future possibilities. Dissecting the word itself and the concept of evil can change how teachers approach historical atrocities (e.g., genocides like the Holocaust/Shoah) and current events (e.g., political posturing over Iran and Russia). A significant lack of scholarship exists regarding how youths conceptualize evil. To begin to address this gap, we are reporting preliminary research that has shown a complexity in youth understandings of evil, highlighting the need for more exploratory research.","PeriodicalId":35607,"journal":{"name":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","volume":"60 1","pages":"213-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7939/R39S1KW52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is crucial that social studies research attempt to understand students’ conceptualizations of evil because a longstanding societal issue is politicians furthering their agenda through the exploitation of the semantic impact of “evil” (Dews, 2008). If social studies teachers are informed about youth conceptualizations of evil, they might approach curriculum in a more meaningful and critical way, particularly contemporary events. George W. Bush infamously used the phrase “axis of evil” as a rallying cry for the United States’ war in Iraq (Bush, 2002) and more recently Stephen Harper has dubbed Iran as evil and also linked Nazism, MarxistLeninism, and terrorism together as reinventions of a similar evil that seeks to destroy “human liberty” (Marsden, 2012; Perkel, 2014). Evil is a familiar social signifier in politics and popular culture, but it is rarely defined or discussed. Yet, students’ nascent understanding of evil informs how they interpret historical and current events and whether they see such events as inevitable, thus affecting their sense of future possibilities. Dissecting the word itself and the concept of evil can change how teachers approach historical atrocities (e.g., genocides like the Holocaust/Shoah) and current events (e.g., political posturing over Iran and Russia). A significant lack of scholarship exists regarding how youths conceptualize evil. To begin to address this gap, we are reporting preliminary research that has shown a complexity in youth understandings of evil, highlighting the need for more exploratory research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年对恶的观念及其对社会教育的启示
社会研究试图理解学生对邪恶的概念化是至关重要的,因为一个长期存在的社会问题是政治家通过利用“邪恶”的语义影响来推进他们的议程(Dews, 2008)。如果社会研究教师了解青少年对邪恶的概念化,他们可能会以一种更有意义和批判性的方式来教授课程,尤其是当代事件。乔治·w·布什臭名昭著地使用“邪恶轴心”一词作为美国在伊拉克战争的战斗口号(布什,2002年),最近斯蒂芬·哈珀称伊朗为邪恶,并将纳粹主义、马克思列宁主义和恐怖主义联系在一起,认为它们是试图摧毁“人类自由”的类似邪恶的重新发明(马斯登,2012年;Perkel, 2014)。在政治和流行文化中,邪恶是一个常见的社会符号,但很少被定义或讨论。然而,学生对邪恶的初步理解影响了他们如何解释历史和当前的事件,以及他们是否认为这些事件是不可避免的,从而影响了他们对未来可能性的认识。剖析这个词本身和邪恶的概念可以改变教师对待历史暴行(例如,像大屠杀/大屠杀这样的种族灭绝)和当前事件(例如,对伊朗和俄罗斯的政治姿态)的方式。关于年轻人如何将邪恶概念化的问题,学术界的研究明显缺乏。为了开始解决这一差距,我们正在报告初步研究,该研究显示了年轻人对邪恶的理解的复杂性,强调了更多探索性研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alberta Journal of Educational Research
Alberta Journal of Educational Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Alberta Journal of Educational Research is a quarterly journal devoted to the dissemination, criticism, interpretation, and encouragement of all forms of systematic inquiry into education and fields related to or associated with education
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Drama-Based Social Studies Education on Psychological Resilience and Well-Being Levels of Secondary School Students Affected by the Earthquake AJER at 70: Looking Back, Looking Forward “They know how to navigate…but they don’t know where to go”: Students’ Feedback on Mathematics Teachers’ Practices Changing the Story: Indigenous Youth Belong in Post-Secondary Education Single-Sex schooling at an Elite Independent School: A Multi-Methods Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1