Low Patient Weight and Long Intubation Time Are Key Factors for Pain during Colonoscopy.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Acta medica Okayama Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.18926/AMO/65969
Shohei Oka, Keita Harada, Shumpei Yamamoto, Eriko Yasutomi, Shoko Igawa, Masayasu Ohmori, Mami Hirai, Yasushi Yamasaki, Toshihiro Inokuchi, Hideaki Kinugasa, Masahiro Takahara, Sakiko Hiraoka, Hiroyuki Okada
{"title":"Low Patient Weight and Long Intubation Time Are Key Factors for Pain during Colonoscopy.","authors":"Shohei Oka,&nbsp;Keita Harada,&nbsp;Shumpei Yamamoto,&nbsp;Eriko Yasutomi,&nbsp;Shoko Igawa,&nbsp;Masayasu Ohmori,&nbsp;Mami Hirai,&nbsp;Yasushi Yamasaki,&nbsp;Toshihiro Inokuchi,&nbsp;Hideaki Kinugasa,&nbsp;Masahiro Takahara,&nbsp;Sakiko Hiraoka,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Okada","doi":"10.18926/AMO/65969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the clinical usefulness of colonoscopy has been established, the procedure remains painful for many patients. This study was designed to clarify the factors predicting colonoscopy-related pain. We evaluated 283 consecutive patients who completed a first-ever, total colonoscopy without sedatives or analgesics. The severity of pain symptoms was evaluated by a numeric rating scale (NRS) in a questionnaire immediately after the colonoscopy. Patient backgrounds and endoscopic findings were analyzed to evaluate their association with pain. Out of 283 patients, 53 scored their pain 0-1 on the NRS while 48 scored it 6-10. We defined the colonoscopies of the former and latter patients as painless and painful, respectively, and compared the two. Multivariate analyses revealed that low body weight (OR 4.95, 95%CI 1.89-12.99) and longer intubation time (OR 3.63, 95%CI 1.46-9.03) were significant risk factors for painful colonoscopy. To identify factors contributing to the increased intubation time, we divided subjects into short- and long-intubation-time groups based on a median insertion time of 7 min. Older age (OR 2.28, 95%CI 1.31-3.98), previous abdominal surgery (OR 1.93, 95%CI 1.13-3.32) and findings of invasive cancer (OR 10.90, 95%CI 1.34-88.90) were significant factors for longer intubation time.</p>","PeriodicalId":7017,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Okayama","volume":"77 5","pages":"471-478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Okayama","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/65969","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the clinical usefulness of colonoscopy has been established, the procedure remains painful for many patients. This study was designed to clarify the factors predicting colonoscopy-related pain. We evaluated 283 consecutive patients who completed a first-ever, total colonoscopy without sedatives or analgesics. The severity of pain symptoms was evaluated by a numeric rating scale (NRS) in a questionnaire immediately after the colonoscopy. Patient backgrounds and endoscopic findings were analyzed to evaluate their association with pain. Out of 283 patients, 53 scored their pain 0-1 on the NRS while 48 scored it 6-10. We defined the colonoscopies of the former and latter patients as painless and painful, respectively, and compared the two. Multivariate analyses revealed that low body weight (OR 4.95, 95%CI 1.89-12.99) and longer intubation time (OR 3.63, 95%CI 1.46-9.03) were significant risk factors for painful colonoscopy. To identify factors contributing to the increased intubation time, we divided subjects into short- and long-intubation-time groups based on a median insertion time of 7 min. Older age (OR 2.28, 95%CI 1.31-3.98), previous abdominal surgery (OR 1.93, 95%CI 1.13-3.32) and findings of invasive cancer (OR 10.90, 95%CI 1.34-88.90) were significant factors for longer intubation time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者体重低和插管时间长是结肠镜检查期间疼痛的关键因素。
尽管结肠镜检查的临床实用性已经确立,但对许多患者来说,这一过程仍然很痛苦。本研究旨在阐明结肠镜检查相关疼痛的预测因素。我们评估了283名连续患者,他们在没有镇静剂或止痛药的情况下完成了首次全结肠镜检查。结肠镜检查后立即用数字评定量表(NRS)在问卷中评估疼痛症状的严重程度。对患者背景和内镜检查结果进行分析,以评估其与疼痛的关系。在283名患者中,53名患者在NRS中的疼痛评分为0-1,48名患者的疼痛评分则为6-10。我们将前者和后者的结肠镜检查分别定义为无痛和疼痛,并对两者进行了比较。多因素分析显示,低体重(OR 4.95,95%CI 1.89-12.99)和较长的插管时间(OR 3.63,95%CI 1.46-9.03)是疼痛性结肠镜检查的重要危险因素。为了确定导致插管时间增加的因素,我们根据平均插管时间7分钟将受试者分为短插管时间组和长插管时间组。年龄较大(OR 2.28,95%CI 1.31-3.98)、既往腹部手术(OR 1.93,95%CI 1.13-3.32)和侵袭性癌症的发现(OR 10.90,95%CI 1.33-88.90)是延长插管时间的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica Okayama
Acta medica Okayama 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Okayama (AMO) publishes papers relating to all areas of basic and clinical medical science. Papers may be submitted by those not affiliated with Okayama University. Only original papers which have not been published or submitted elsewhere and timely review articles should be submitted. Original papers may be Full-length Articles or Short Communications. Case Reports are considered if they describe significant and substantial new findings. Preliminary observations are not accepted.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Radon Inhalation on Murine Brain Proteins: Investigation Using Proteomic and Multivariate Analyses. Factors Affecting Dynamic Postural Control Ability in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Focal Cerebral Hypoperfusion Detected by Arterial Spin-Labeled Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Migraine Presenting with Neurological Symptoms Concomitant with or without Headache. Occult Nesidioblastosis Detected by 111In-Pentetreotide Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography. Pediatric Severe Febrile Thrombocytopenia Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1