Neurological Analysis Based on the Terminal End of the Spinal Cord and the Narrowest Level of Injured Spine in Thoracolumbar Spinal Injuries.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Acta medica Okayama Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.18926/AMO/65972
Yuji Hatakeyama, Michio Hongo, Tadato Kido, Masakazu Urayama, Yuji Kasukawa, Hiroshi Sasaki, Toshiaki Aizawa, Daisuke Kudo, Ryota Kimura, Yuichi Ono, Fumihito Kasama, Naohisa Miyakoshi
{"title":"Neurological Analysis Based on the Terminal End of the Spinal Cord and the Narrowest Level of Injured Spine in Thoracolumbar Spinal Injuries.","authors":"Yuji Hatakeyama,&nbsp;Michio Hongo,&nbsp;Tadato Kido,&nbsp;Masakazu Urayama,&nbsp;Yuji Kasukawa,&nbsp;Hiroshi Sasaki,&nbsp;Toshiaki Aizawa,&nbsp;Daisuke Kudo,&nbsp;Ryota Kimura,&nbsp;Yuichi Ono,&nbsp;Fumihito Kasama,&nbsp;Naohisa Miyakoshi","doi":"10.18926/AMO/65972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to clarify neurological differences among the epiconus, conus medullaris, and cauda equina syndromes. Eighty-seven patients who underwent surgery for acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries were assessed. We defined the epiconus as the region from the terminal end of the spinal cord to the proximal 1.0 to 2.25 vertebral bodies, the conus medullaris as the region proximal to < 1.0 vertebral bodies, and the cauda equina as the distal part of the nerve roots originating from the spinal cord. On the basis of the distance from the terminal end of the spinal cord to the narrowest level of the spinal canal, the narrowest levels were ordered as follows: the epiconus followed by the conus medullaris and cauda equina. The narrowest levels were the epiconus in 22 patients, conus medullaris in 37 patients, and cauda equina in 25 patients. On admission, significantly more patients had a narrowed epiconus of Frankel grades A-C than a narrowed cauda equina. At the final follow-up, there were no significant differences in neurological recovery among those with epiconus, conus medullaris, or cauda equina syndrome. Anatomically classifying the narrowest lesion is useful for clarifying the differences and similarities among these three syndromes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7017,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Okayama","volume":"77 5","pages":"499-509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Okayama","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/65972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to clarify neurological differences among the epiconus, conus medullaris, and cauda equina syndromes. Eighty-seven patients who underwent surgery for acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries were assessed. We defined the epiconus as the region from the terminal end of the spinal cord to the proximal 1.0 to 2.25 vertebral bodies, the conus medullaris as the region proximal to < 1.0 vertebral bodies, and the cauda equina as the distal part of the nerve roots originating from the spinal cord. On the basis of the distance from the terminal end of the spinal cord to the narrowest level of the spinal canal, the narrowest levels were ordered as follows: the epiconus followed by the conus medullaris and cauda equina. The narrowest levels were the epiconus in 22 patients, conus medullaris in 37 patients, and cauda equina in 25 patients. On admission, significantly more patients had a narrowed epiconus of Frankel grades A-C than a narrowed cauda equina. At the final follow-up, there were no significant differences in neurological recovery among those with epiconus, conus medullaris, or cauda equina syndrome. Anatomically classifying the narrowest lesion is useful for clarifying the differences and similarities among these three syndromes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于胸腰椎损伤脊髓末端和损伤脊柱最窄水平的神经学分析。
本研究旨在阐明上睑、脊髓圆锥和马尾综合征之间的神经差异。对87例因急性胸腰椎损伤而接受手术的患者进行了评估。我们将上睑线定义为从脊髓末端到近端1.0至2.25椎体的区域,将脊髓圆锥定义为<1.0椎体的近端区域,将马尾神经定义为源自脊髓的神经根的远端部分。根据从脊髓末端到椎管最窄水平的距离,最窄水平排列如下:上睑,然后是脊髓圆锥和马尾。最窄的水平是22例患者的上睑,37例患者的脊髓圆锥,25例患者的马尾。入院时,明显更多的患者的Frankel a-C级上睑肌缩小,而不是马尾肌缩小。在最后的随访中,上睑、脊髓圆锥或马尾综合征患者的神经功能恢复没有显著差异。对最窄病变进行解剖学分类有助于澄清这三种综合征之间的差异和相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica Okayama
Acta medica Okayama 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Okayama (AMO) publishes papers relating to all areas of basic and clinical medical science. Papers may be submitted by those not affiliated with Okayama University. Only original papers which have not been published or submitted elsewhere and timely review articles should be submitted. Original papers may be Full-length Articles or Short Communications. Case Reports are considered if they describe significant and substantial new findings. Preliminary observations are not accepted.
期刊最新文献
Closure of Ventricular Septal Rupture through a Left Thoracotomy in a Patient with a History of Esophageal Reconstruction. Partial versus Radical Nephrectomy for Small Renal Cancer: Comparative Propensity Score-Matching Analysis of Cardiovascular Event Risk. Risk Factors for Gangrenous Cholecystitis and the Outcomes of Early Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study of a Single-Center City General Hospital. Secondary Polymyalgia Rheumatica Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Traumatic Neuroma Arising from Surgical Trauma during Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1