Signalling need for care: a neglected functional role of medical treatment.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health Pub Date : 2023-08-14 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/emph/eoad024
Mícheál de Barra, Kawthar Hakimy, Marijn de Bruin
{"title":"Signalling need for care: a neglected functional role of medical treatment.","authors":"Mícheál de Barra,&nbsp;Kawthar Hakimy,&nbsp;Marijn de Bruin","doi":"10.1093/emph/eoad024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>While the primary goals of medical treatment are typically to shorten illness or relieve symptoms, we explore the idea that an important additional goal for some patients is to communicate their needs. Drawing on <i>signalling theory</i>, we argue that undergoing treatments can help patients legitimize their illness and thereby enable access to crucial support during convalescence.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Four pre-registered within-subjects experiments (<i>n</i> = 874) show that participants are more inclined to provide care to people who undergo treatment, especially when that treatment is painful. Results show this incentivizes the use of antibiotic treatments for viral infections as well as drug treatments for mental illness. A cross-sectional study of 194 chronic pain patients shows that those who experience stigma and doubt over the legitimacy of their illness are more likely to accept aversive treatments. Furthermore, two experiments (<i>n</i> = 653) indicate that subtle manipulations of one's sense of social support may increase willingness to accept treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>These results indicate that people make decisions to provide care in part based on the presence or absence of treatment and furthermore that patients' treatment decision-making is informed by the social consequences of their choices. Signalling theory may help explain the surprising longevity of some ineffective and costly medical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12156,"journal":{"name":"Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10611421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoad024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: While the primary goals of medical treatment are typically to shorten illness or relieve symptoms, we explore the idea that an important additional goal for some patients is to communicate their needs. Drawing on signalling theory, we argue that undergoing treatments can help patients legitimize their illness and thereby enable access to crucial support during convalescence.

Methods and results: Four pre-registered within-subjects experiments (n = 874) show that participants are more inclined to provide care to people who undergo treatment, especially when that treatment is painful. Results show this incentivizes the use of antibiotic treatments for viral infections as well as drug treatments for mental illness. A cross-sectional study of 194 chronic pain patients shows that those who experience stigma and doubt over the legitimacy of their illness are more likely to accept aversive treatments. Furthermore, two experiments (n = 653) indicate that subtle manipulations of one's sense of social support may increase willingness to accept treatment.

Conclusions and implications: These results indicate that people make decisions to provide care in part based on the presence or absence of treatment and furthermore that patients' treatment decision-making is informed by the social consequences of their choices. Signalling theory may help explain the surprising longevity of some ineffective and costly medical procedures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理需求的信号:医疗的一个被忽视的功能性作用。
背景和目的:虽然医疗的主要目标通常是缩短疾病或缓解症状,但我们探讨了对一些患者来说,一个重要的额外目标是沟通他们的需求。根据信号理论,我们认为接受治疗可以帮助患者使他们的疾病合法化,从而使他们能够在康复期间获得关键的支持。方法和结果:四项预先注册的受试者内部实验(n=874)表明,参与者更倾向于为接受治疗的人提供护理,尤其是在治疗疼痛时。结果表明,这激励了对病毒感染使用抗生素治疗以及对精神疾病使用药物治疗。一项针对194名慢性疼痛患者的横断面研究表明,那些对自己疾病的合法性感到耻辱和怀疑的人更有可能接受厌恶的治疗。此外,两个实验(n=653)表明,对一个人的社会支持感的微妙操纵可能会增加接受治疗的意愿。结论和启示:这些结果表明,人们在一定程度上是根据是否接受治疗来决定提供护理的,此外,患者的治疗决策是由他们选择的社会后果决定的。信号理论可能有助于解释一些无效且昂贵的医疗程序的惊人寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health Environmental Science-Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
37
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Founded by Stephen Stearns in 2013, Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health is an open access journal that publishes original, rigorous applications of evolutionary science to issues in medicine and public health. It aims to connect evolutionary biology with the health sciences to produce insights that may reduce suffering and save lives. Because evolutionary biology is a basic science that reaches across many disciplines, this journal is open to contributions on a broad range of topics.
期刊最新文献
Birth and household exposures are associated with changes to skin bacterial communities during infancy Low haemoglobin in arduous seasons is associated with reduced chance of ovulation among women living in the Bolivian altiplano Diagnostic testing and the evolution of detection avoidance by pathogens The Elephant and the Spandrel Coping with extreme heat: current exposure and implications for the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1