ERCP-related adverse events: incidence, mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and management.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-23 DOI:10.1080/17474124.2023.2277776
Angelica Rivas, Simran Pherwani, Rachid Mohamed, Zachary L Smith, B Joseph Elmunzer, Nauzer Forbes
{"title":"ERCP-related adverse events: incidence, mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and management.","authors":"Angelica Rivas, Simran Pherwani, Rachid Mohamed, Zachary L Smith, B Joseph Elmunzer, Nauzer Forbes","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2023.2277776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a commonly performed procedure for pancreaticobiliary disease. While ERCP is highly effective, it is also associated with the highest adverse event (AE) rates of all commonly performed endoscopic procedures. Thus, it is critical that endoscopists and caregivers of patients undergoing ERCP have clear understandings of ERCP-related AEs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the available evidence on ERCP-related AEs. For the purposes of this review, we subdivide the presentation of each ERCP-related AE according to the following clinically relevant domains: definitions and incidence, proposed mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and recognition and management. The evidence informing this review was derived in part from a search of the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, performed on 1 May 20231 May 2023.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Knowledge of ERCP-related AEs is critical not only given potential improvements in peri-procedural quality and related care that can ensue but also given the importance of reviewing these considerations with patients during informed consent. The ERCP community and researchers should aim to apply standardized definitions of AEs. Evidence-based knowledge of ERCP risk factors should inform patient care decisions during training and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"1101-1116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2023.2277776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a commonly performed procedure for pancreaticobiliary disease. While ERCP is highly effective, it is also associated with the highest adverse event (AE) rates of all commonly performed endoscopic procedures. Thus, it is critical that endoscopists and caregivers of patients undergoing ERCP have clear understandings of ERCP-related AEs.

Areas covered: This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the available evidence on ERCP-related AEs. For the purposes of this review, we subdivide the presentation of each ERCP-related AE according to the following clinically relevant domains: definitions and incidence, proposed mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and recognition and management. The evidence informing this review was derived in part from a search of the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, performed on 1 May 20231 May 2023.

Expert opinion: Knowledge of ERCP-related AEs is critical not only given potential improvements in peri-procedural quality and related care that can ensue but also given the importance of reviewing these considerations with patients during informed consent. The ERCP community and researchers should aim to apply standardized definitions of AEs. Evidence-based knowledge of ERCP risk factors should inform patient care decisions during training and beyond.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ERCP相关不良事件:发生率、机制、危险因素、预防和管理。
简介:内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)是治疗胰胆管疾病的常用方法。虽然ERCP非常有效,但它也与所有常见内镜手术中最高的不良事件(AE)发生率有关。因此,内镜医生和ERCP患者的护理人员对ERCP相关AE有明确的了解是至关重要的。涵盖的领域:本叙述性综述对ERCP相关AE的可用证据进行了全面概述。为了本综述的目的,我们根据以下临床相关领域对每种ERCP相关AE的表现进行了细分:定义和发病率、拟议的机制、风险因素、预防以及识别和管理。本次审查的证据部分来自于2023年5月1日对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane电子数据库的搜索。专家意见:ERCP相关AE的知识至关重要,不仅考虑到围手术期质量和相关护理的潜在改善,而且考虑到在知情同意期间与患者一起审查这些考虑因素的重要性。ERCP社区和研究人员应致力于应用AE的标准化定义。基于证据的ERCP风险因素知识应在培训期间及以后为患者的护理决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The enormous health and economic burden of gastrointestinal disease worldwide warrants a sharp focus on the etiology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and development of new therapies. By the end of the last century we had seen enormous advances, both in technologies to visualize disease and in curative therapies in areas such as gastric ulcer, with the advent first of the H2-antagonists and then the proton pump inhibitors - clear examples of how advances in medicine can massively benefit the patient. Nevertheless, specialists face ongoing challenges from a wide array of diseases of diverse etiology.
期刊最新文献
Cellular senescence and its pathogenic and therapeutic implications in autoimmune hepatitis. Implications of the microbiome after pancreatic cancer resection with regards to morbidity & mortality. Diagnosing and managing gastroparesis - where are we now? Interrupting inflammatory bowel disease therapy: why, who, when and how to consider medication holidays. Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: recent developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1