"They Don't Have Time, But It Would Be Wonderful": Residents' Views of Their Relationships With Staff.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of gerontological nursing Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.3928/00989134-20231010-03
Diana White, Serena Hasworth
{"title":"\"They Don't Have Time, But It Would Be Wonderful\": Residents' Views of Their Relationships With Staff.","authors":"Diana White,&nbsp;Serena Hasworth","doi":"10.3928/00989134-20231010-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resident-staff relationships is a component of person-centered care (PCC); positive relationships are associated with positive outcomes. The current article explores the finding that residents living in different types of long-term care assigned the lowest ratings of importance to the PCC domain \"relationships with staff \" (one of eight domains studied). Thematic analysis of spontaneous comments made by residents during interviews identified two themes, <i>Relationship Preferences</i> (for privacy, boundaries, engagement) and <i>Lived Experience With Staff</i> (staff busyness, staff interactions). Low ratings of relationship importance may reflect preferences for privacy and maintaining boundaries with staff. Ratings by some residents may be related to staff busyness, an overarching theme. Staff busyness was associated with lack of personal interaction with staff, including for those who expressed preferences for engagement and those who described positive interactions with staff. Some residents may reappraise their views about the importance of relationships to reduce cognitive dissonance. Improving job quality is necessary to assure quality time with residents. [<i>Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49</i>(11), 8-14.].</p>","PeriodicalId":15848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gerontological nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gerontological nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20231010-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resident-staff relationships is a component of person-centered care (PCC); positive relationships are associated with positive outcomes. The current article explores the finding that residents living in different types of long-term care assigned the lowest ratings of importance to the PCC domain "relationships with staff " (one of eight domains studied). Thematic analysis of spontaneous comments made by residents during interviews identified two themes, Relationship Preferences (for privacy, boundaries, engagement) and Lived Experience With Staff (staff busyness, staff interactions). Low ratings of relationship importance may reflect preferences for privacy and maintaining boundaries with staff. Ratings by some residents may be related to staff busyness, an overarching theme. Staff busyness was associated with lack of personal interaction with staff, including for those who expressed preferences for engagement and those who described positive interactions with staff. Some residents may reappraise their views about the importance of relationships to reduce cognitive dissonance. Improving job quality is necessary to assure quality time with residents. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(11), 8-14.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“他们没有时间,但会很好”:居民对他们与员工关系的看法。
住院员工关系是以人为中心的护理(PCC)的一个组成部分;积极的关系与积极的结果有关。目前的文章探讨了一项发现,即生活在不同类型长期护理中的居民对PCC领域“与员工的关系”(所研究的八个领域之一)的重要性评级最低。对居民在访谈中自发发表的评论进行主题分析,确定了两个主题,关系偏好(隐私、边界、参与度)和与员工的生活体验(员工忙碌、员工互动)。关系重要性的低评级可能反映了对隐私和与员工保持界限的偏好。一些居民的评分可能与员工的忙碌有关,这是一个总体主题。工作人员的忙碌与缺乏与工作人员的个人互动有关,包括那些表达了参与偏好的人和那些描述了与工作人员积极互动的人。一些居民可能会重新评估他们对关系重要性的看法,以减少认知失调。提高工作质量是保证与居民相处时间的必要条件。[老年护理杂志,49(11),8-14。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontological Nursing is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing clinically relevant original articles on the practice of gerontological nursing across the continuum of care in a variety of health care settings, for more than 40 years.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Family Caregivers of Older Adults With Dementia in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis. Feasibility of Fall-Risk Detection in Older Adults: Real-World Use of Sensor Data With Machine Learning. Feasibility of Whole-Body Resistance Training With Social Support Reinforcement for Older Adults Living Alone: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study. Gerontological Nurses' Civic Duty: Impact of November's Election on Rural Health and Older Adults. Nurses' Provision of Sexual and Reproductive Health to Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1