Comparison of palliative care education for family caregivers in high-and-low-income countries: An integrative review.

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING Belitung Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.33546/bnj.2713
Martina Sinta Kristanti, Nurdina Wahyu Hidayati, Maryadi
{"title":"Comparison of palliative care education for family caregivers in high-and-low-income countries: An integrative review.","authors":"Martina Sinta Kristanti,&nbsp;Nurdina Wahyu Hidayati,&nbsp;Maryadi","doi":"10.33546/bnj.2713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In most resource-limited countries, palliative care is still under development. Despite the differences, the involvement of family caregivers is fundamental in both High-Income Countries (HICs) and Low-Income Countries (LICs). The lack of formal support in LICs implies that educational interventions to support family caregivers in this region could be more complex and urgently needed than in HICs. To comprehend the existing situation and identify the gaps in LICs, using HICs as a benchmark standard and conducting a review comparing educational interventions in both regions is essential.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and compare the existing implementation of education for family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in LICs and HICs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An integrative review guideline by Whittemore and Knafl was followed. Interventional studies related to education for family caregivers providing care for adult patients with cancer were included, and review articles were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Data were obtained from PubMed, EBSCO, ProQuest, and ClinicalKey. The search was conducted on 18 November 2021 and updated on 9 August 2023.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Data reduction, data comparison, conclusion drawing, and data verification were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 11 studies included, nine were randomized controlled trials, and two were quasi-experimental studies. Among them, seven (63%) were conducted in HICs, and four (37%) were carried out in LICs. In both regions, the psychological aspect was the most commonly addressed subject in palliative care education for family caregivers. However, in LICs, no articles specifically addressed the social and spiritual aspects of family caregivers' education. Research conducted in LICs mostly involved nurses, while studies in HICs included a more diverse range of healthcare professionals. Typically, these programs required two to three sessions, with 30-60 minutes duration for 3-12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The social and spiritual aspects can be integrated into family caregivers' training programs in LICs in the near future. Nurses, as an integral part of the multidisciplinary team, are capable of contributing to the development of educational programs for family caregivers, especially in resource-limited countries where patients rely heavily on their caregivers and relatives. Support from nurses is fundamental in such contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":42002,"journal":{"name":"Belitung Nursing Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belitung Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In most resource-limited countries, palliative care is still under development. Despite the differences, the involvement of family caregivers is fundamental in both High-Income Countries (HICs) and Low-Income Countries (LICs). The lack of formal support in LICs implies that educational interventions to support family caregivers in this region could be more complex and urgently needed than in HICs. To comprehend the existing situation and identify the gaps in LICs, using HICs as a benchmark standard and conducting a review comparing educational interventions in both regions is essential.

Objective: To identify and compare the existing implementation of education for family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in LICs and HICs.

Design: An integrative review guideline by Whittemore and Knafl was followed. Interventional studies related to education for family caregivers providing care for adult patients with cancer were included, and review articles were excluded.

Data sources: Data were obtained from PubMed, EBSCO, ProQuest, and ClinicalKey. The search was conducted on 18 November 2021 and updated on 9 August 2023.

Review methods: Data reduction, data comparison, conclusion drawing, and data verification were conducted.

Results: Out of the 11 studies included, nine were randomized controlled trials, and two were quasi-experimental studies. Among them, seven (63%) were conducted in HICs, and four (37%) were carried out in LICs. In both regions, the psychological aspect was the most commonly addressed subject in palliative care education for family caregivers. However, in LICs, no articles specifically addressed the social and spiritual aspects of family caregivers' education. Research conducted in LICs mostly involved nurses, while studies in HICs included a more diverse range of healthcare professionals. Typically, these programs required two to three sessions, with 30-60 minutes duration for 3-12 weeks.

Conclusion: The social and spiritual aspects can be integrated into family caregivers' training programs in LICs in the near future. Nurses, as an integral part of the multidisciplinary team, are capable of contributing to the development of educational programs for family caregivers, especially in resource-limited countries where patients rely heavily on their caregivers and relatives. Support from nurses is fundamental in such contexts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高收入和低收入国家家庭照顾者姑息治疗教育的比较:一项综合综述。
背景:在大多数资源有限的国家,姑息治疗仍在发展中。尽管存在差异,但家庭照顾者的参与在高收入国家和低收入国家都是至关重要的。低收入国家缺乏正式支持意味着,支持该地区家庭照顾者的教育干预措施可能比高收入国家更复杂,也更迫切需要。为了了解现有情况并确定低收入国家的差距,将高收入国家作为基准标准,并对两个地区的教育干预措施进行比较,这一点至关重要。目的:确定并比较LIC和HIC中晚期癌症患者家庭护理人员教育的现有实施情况。设计:遵循Whittemore和Knafl的综合审查指南。纳入了与为癌症成年患者提供护理的家庭护理人员教育相关的干预研究,排除了综述文章。数据来源:数据来源于PubMed、EBSCO、ProQuest和ClinicalKey。搜索于2021年11月18日进行,并于2023年8月9日更新。审查方法:数据缩减、数据比较、得出结论和数据验证。结果:在纳入的11项研究中,9项为随机对照试验,2项为准实验研究。其中,7例(63%)在HIC中进行,4例(37%)在LIC中进行。在这两个地区,心理方面是家庭照顾者姑息治疗教育中最常见的主题。然而,在LIC中,没有任何文章专门涉及家庭照顾者教育的社会和精神方面。在LIC中进行的研究主要涉及护士,而在HIC中的研究则包括更多样化的医疗保健专业人员。通常,这些课程需要两到三次,持续时间为30-60分钟,为期3-12周。结论:在不久的将来,可以将社会和精神方面纳入LIC的家庭照顾者培训计划。护士作为多学科团队的一个组成部分,有能力为家庭护理人员的教育计划的制定做出贡献,尤其是在资源有限的国家,患者严重依赖他们的护理人员和亲属。在这种情况下,护士的支持是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diabetes self-management and its influencing factors among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in rural Sri Lanka: A cross-sectional study. Experiences of Indonesian women with breast cancer underwent treatment decision-making: A qualitative study. Experiences of Muslim patients living with peritoneal dialysis: A qualitative study in Southern Thailand. Exploring barriers to physical activity participation among female nursing students adhering to specific social-cultural norms in Indonesia: A qualitative study. Factors predicting depression among persons post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A cross-sectional study in Thailand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1