Clinical Impact on Dental Implant Survival in Patients Taking Antiresorptive Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral Implantology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00160
Miriam Ting, Benzon H Huynh, Henok G Woldu, Ibrahim Gamal, Jon B Suzuki
{"title":"Clinical Impact on Dental Implant Survival in Patients Taking Antiresorptive Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Miriam Ting, Benzon H Huynh, Henok G Woldu, Ibrahim Gamal, Jon B Suzuki","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dental implants are a predictable option to replace missing teeth. Patients on antiresorptive medications used to treat disorders associated with bone resorption may need dental implants to replace missing teeth. The data on implant failure in patients on antiresorptive medication requiring dental implants, is conflicting and limited. This systematic review aims to investigate if antiresorptive medications have any clinical impact on dental implant survival. Electronic databases were searched until May 2020. The focus question (PICOS): Participants: humans, Interventions: implant placement surgery in patients on antiresorptive medication, Comparisons: patients on antiresorptive medication vs control (patients not on antiresorptive medication), Outcomes: implant survival, and Study design: clinical studies. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020209083). Fourteen nonrandomized studies were selected for data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the ROBINS-1 tool. Only studies with a control were included for the meta-analysis, 8 articles were included in the meta-analysis using implant-level data, and 5 articles were included in the meta-analysis using patient-level data. There was no statistical significance between the 2 groups at the patient level based on 265 patients. However, there was a statistically significant difference at the implant level based on 2697 implants. Therefore, antiresorptive medications, mainly bisphosphonates (BPs), may significantly contribute to implant failure. Antiresorptive medications, especially BPs may reduce implant survival and impair the osseointegration of dental implants. Failed implants in patients on BPs may not lead to osteonecrosis and may be replaced with success.</p>","PeriodicalId":50101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":" ","pages":"599-615"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dental implants are a predictable option to replace missing teeth. Patients on antiresorptive medications used to treat disorders associated with bone resorption may need dental implants to replace missing teeth. The data on implant failure in patients on antiresorptive medication requiring dental implants, is conflicting and limited. This systematic review aims to investigate if antiresorptive medications have any clinical impact on dental implant survival. Electronic databases were searched until May 2020. The focus question (PICOS): Participants: humans, Interventions: implant placement surgery in patients on antiresorptive medication, Comparisons: patients on antiresorptive medication vs control (patients not on antiresorptive medication), Outcomes: implant survival, and Study design: clinical studies. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020209083). Fourteen nonrandomized studies were selected for data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the ROBINS-1 tool. Only studies with a control were included for the meta-analysis, 8 articles were included in the meta-analysis using implant-level data, and 5 articles were included in the meta-analysis using patient-level data. There was no statistical significance between the 2 groups at the patient level based on 265 patients. However, there was a statistically significant difference at the implant level based on 2697 implants. Therefore, antiresorptive medications, mainly bisphosphonates (BPs), may significantly contribute to implant failure. Antiresorptive medications, especially BPs may reduce implant survival and impair the osseointegration of dental implants. Failed implants in patients on BPs may not lead to osteonecrosis and may be replaced with success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服用抗再吸收药物的患者对种植体存活率的临床影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:种植牙是一种可预测的替代缺失牙齿的选择。使用抗再吸收药物治疗骨吸收相关疾病的患者可能需要种植牙来替换缺失的牙齿。关于需要种植牙的抗再吸收药物患者种植失败的数据是矛盾和有限的。这篇系统综述旨在调查抗再吸收药物是否对种植牙的存活有任何临床影响。方法和方法:检索电子数据库至2020年5月。焦点问题(PICOS):参与者:人类,干预措施:接受抗再吸收药物治疗的患者的植入手术,比较:服用抗再吸收药的患者与对照组(未服用抗再摄取药的患者),结果:植入存活率,研究设计:临床研究。该系统综述的方案已在PROSPERO(CRD42020209083)中注册。结果:选择了14项非随机研究,使用ROBINS-1工具进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。只有对照研究被纳入荟萃分析,8篇文章被纳入使用植入水平数据的荟萃分析,5篇文章被列入使用患者水平数据的元分析。基于265名患者,两组在患者水平上没有统计学意义。然而,在2697个植入物的基础上,植入物水平存在统计学上的显著差异。因此,抗再吸收药物,主要是双磷酸盐(BPs),可能会显著导致植入失败。结论:抗吸收药物,尤其是BPs可能会降低种植体的存活率,损害种植体的骨整合。植入失败的BPs患者可能不会导致骨坏死,可以成功替换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Implantology
Journal of Oral Implantology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry and of the American Academy of Implant Prosthodontics, is dedicated to providing valuable information to general dentists, oral surgeons, prosthodontists, periodontists, scientists, clinicians, laboratory owners and technicians, manufacturers, and educators. Implant basics, prosthetics, pharmaceuticals, the latest research in implantology, implant surgery, and advanced implant procedures are just some of the topics covered.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Biomechanical Behaviors of Different Designs and Configurations of Titanium and Zirconium Dental Implants With Finite Elements Analysis in Anterior Maxilla. Enhancing Precision and Efficiency in Fabricating Complete Arch Screw-Retained Implant Prosthesis: A Clinical Case Report Utilizing the Nexus iOS Scan Gauge System. Reconstruction of the Fully Edentulous Maxilla Using Sinus Grafts and Bone Expansion: A Retrospective Analysis of 50 Consecutive Cases. All-on-4 Concept With Use Of Zygoma Implants for Rehabilitation in the Severely Atrophied Maxilla With a Definitive Immediate Restoration. Clinical Performance of 170 Frictional Morse Taper Implants: 2 Years Follow-Up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1