Differential privacy in collaborative filtering recommender systems: a review.

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Frontiers in Big Data Pub Date : 2023-10-12 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdata.2023.1249997
Peter Müllner, Elisabeth Lex, Markus Schedl, Dominik Kowald
{"title":"Differential privacy in collaborative filtering recommender systems: a review.","authors":"Peter Müllner, Elisabeth Lex, Markus Schedl, Dominik Kowald","doi":"10.3389/fdata.2023.1249997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>State-of-the-art recommender systems produce high-quality recommendations to support users in finding relevant content. However, through the utilization of users' data for generating recommendations, recommender systems threaten users' privacy. To alleviate this threat, often, differential privacy is used to protect users' data via adding random noise. This, however, leads to a substantial drop in recommendation quality. Therefore, several approaches aim to improve this trade-off between accuracy and user privacy. In this work, we first overview threats to user privacy in recommender systems, followed by a brief introduction to the differential privacy framework that can protect users' privacy. Subsequently, we review recommendation approaches that apply differential privacy, and we highlight research that improves the trade-off between recommendation quality and user privacy. Finally, we discuss open issues, e.g., considering the relation between privacy and fairness, and the users' different needs for privacy. With this review, we hope to provide other researchers an overview of the ways in which differential privacy has been applied to state-of-the-art collaborative filtering recommender systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":52859,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Big Data","volume":"6 ","pages":"1249997"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2023.1249997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

State-of-the-art recommender systems produce high-quality recommendations to support users in finding relevant content. However, through the utilization of users' data for generating recommendations, recommender systems threaten users' privacy. To alleviate this threat, often, differential privacy is used to protect users' data via adding random noise. This, however, leads to a substantial drop in recommendation quality. Therefore, several approaches aim to improve this trade-off between accuracy and user privacy. In this work, we first overview threats to user privacy in recommender systems, followed by a brief introduction to the differential privacy framework that can protect users' privacy. Subsequently, we review recommendation approaches that apply differential privacy, and we highlight research that improves the trade-off between recommendation quality and user privacy. Finally, we discuss open issues, e.g., considering the relation between privacy and fairness, and the users' different needs for privacy. With this review, we hope to provide other researchers an overview of the ways in which differential privacy has been applied to state-of-the-art collaborative filtering recommender systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协同过滤推荐系统中的差异隐私:综述。
最先进的推荐系统产生高质量的推荐,以支持用户查找相关内容。然而,通过利用用户的数据来生成推荐,推荐系统威胁到了用户的隐私。为了缓解这种威胁,通常会使用差异隐私来通过添加随机噪声来保护用户的数据。然而,这导致了推荐质量的大幅下降。因此,有几种方法旨在改善准确性和用户隐私之间的这种权衡。在这项工作中,我们首先概述了推荐系统中对用户隐私的威胁,然后简要介绍了可以保护用户隐私的差异隐私框架。随后,我们回顾了应用差异隐私的推荐方法,并重点介绍了改进推荐质量和用户隐私之间权衡的研究。最后,我们讨论了一些悬而未决的问题,例如,考虑隐私和公平之间的关系,以及用户对隐私的不同需求。通过这篇综述,我们希望向其他研究人员概述差异隐私应用于最先进的协作过滤推荐系统的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cultural big data: nineteenth to twenty-first century panoramic visualization. Cybermycelium: a reference architecture for domain-driven distributed big data systems. Cognitive warfare: a conceptual analysis of the NATO ACT cognitive warfare exploratory concept. An enhanced whale optimization algorithm for task scheduling in edge computing environments. Promoting fairness in link prediction with graph enhancement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1