Unravelling barriers in high-tech technology start-ups: practical insights and solutions for healthcare enterprises

IF 7.4 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Enterprise Information Management Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1108/jeim-06-2023-0318
Nidhi Singh, Safiya Mukhtar Alshibani, Pooja Misra, Rabiya Nawaz, Bhumika Gupta
{"title":"Unravelling barriers in high-tech technology start-ups: practical insights and solutions for healthcare enterprises","authors":"Nidhi Singh, Safiya Mukhtar Alshibani, Pooja Misra, Rabiya Nawaz, Bhumika Gupta","doi":"10.1108/jeim-06-2023-0318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Along with technology-based ecosystems, healthcare start-ups are expanding multi-fold. On the other hand, underlying uncertainties pose several challenges for these health-tech enterprises at macro-meso-micro level, influencing their business circumstances and profitability. The current study aims to comprehend the macro-, meso- and micro-level barriers that make it difficult for enterprises to set up healthcare technology start-ups. The study also observed the perceived effect of these challenges on firms' performance and cost structure over time. Using the theory of behaviour under uncertainty, the study revealed multiple systemic, sector-related, human and implementation barriers that hinder business growth and lead to uncertainties for health-tech start-ups.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using a grounded theory approach, the study collected the views of 51 health tech start-ups in the UK using an online participants pool. The data was collected using qualitative data techniques in the form of open-ended essays, and a content analysis using thematic coding process was conducted. The questions centered around the different institutional uncertainties or barriers while setting up or running a healthcare start-up.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study revealed several macro-, meso- and micro-level barriers these technology-based enterprises perceive in the healthcare industry. These are recognised as systemic barriers, such as lack of funding and procedural issues; sector-related barriers, such as market-related impediments; human barriers, including psychological barriers and resistance to new technology; and implementation barriers, such as operational and personnel issues.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study used qualitative, open-ended essay techniques to collect the data. Future studies may use a mixed-methods approach to provide holistic insights. The study is conducted in a single developed country, the UK. Future work may expand these findings by comparing developed market challenges with those of emerging markets and by assessing the viewpoints of healthcare start-ups.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This research will assist the healthcare sector and government understand health tech start-up hurdles and uncertainty. Policymakers must assist start-ups and encourage entrepreneurial innovation. Regulating and enabling policies will help. The paper examines start-ups' macro, meso and micro uncertainties. Policymakers promoting sector entrepreneurship must consider these barriers while designing policy guidelines.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study contributes to the existing literature on technology start-ups, particularly in the healthcare industry, and identifies significant barriers these start-ups face. The study synthesizes research on health-tech start-up uncertainty and bridges the gap between theory and practice by applying empirical findings.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","volume":"2 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-06-2023-0318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Along with technology-based ecosystems, healthcare start-ups are expanding multi-fold. On the other hand, underlying uncertainties pose several challenges for these health-tech enterprises at macro-meso-micro level, influencing their business circumstances and profitability. The current study aims to comprehend the macro-, meso- and micro-level barriers that make it difficult for enterprises to set up healthcare technology start-ups. The study also observed the perceived effect of these challenges on firms' performance and cost structure over time. Using the theory of behaviour under uncertainty, the study revealed multiple systemic, sector-related, human and implementation barriers that hinder business growth and lead to uncertainties for health-tech start-ups.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a grounded theory approach, the study collected the views of 51 health tech start-ups in the UK using an online participants pool. The data was collected using qualitative data techniques in the form of open-ended essays, and a content analysis using thematic coding process was conducted. The questions centered around the different institutional uncertainties or barriers while setting up or running a healthcare start-up.

Findings

The study revealed several macro-, meso- and micro-level barriers these technology-based enterprises perceive in the healthcare industry. These are recognised as systemic barriers, such as lack of funding and procedural issues; sector-related barriers, such as market-related impediments; human barriers, including psychological barriers and resistance to new technology; and implementation barriers, such as operational and personnel issues.

Research limitations/implications

The study used qualitative, open-ended essay techniques to collect the data. Future studies may use a mixed-methods approach to provide holistic insights. The study is conducted in a single developed country, the UK. Future work may expand these findings by comparing developed market challenges with those of emerging markets and by assessing the viewpoints of healthcare start-ups.

Practical implications

This research will assist the healthcare sector and government understand health tech start-up hurdles and uncertainty. Policymakers must assist start-ups and encourage entrepreneurial innovation. Regulating and enabling policies will help. The paper examines start-ups' macro, meso and micro uncertainties. Policymakers promoting sector entrepreneurship must consider these barriers while designing policy guidelines.

Originality/value

The study contributes to the existing literature on technology start-ups, particularly in the healthcare industry, and identifies significant barriers these start-ups face. The study synthesizes research on health-tech start-up uncertainty and bridges the gap between theory and practice by applying empirical findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除高科技初创企业的障碍:针对医疗保健企业的实用见解和解决方案
随着基于技术的生态系统的发展,医疗保健初创企业正在进行多重扩张。另一方面,潜在的不确定性给这些卫生技术企业带来了宏观中观层面的挑战,影响了它们的经营环境和盈利能力。本研究旨在了解企业难以建立医疗科技初创企业的宏观、中观和微观层面的障碍。该研究还观察了这些挑战对公司绩效和成本结构的感知影响。利用不确定性下的行为理论,该研究揭示了阻碍业务增长并导致卫生技术初创企业不确定性的多重系统性、部门相关、人力和实施障碍。设计/方法/方法采用扎根理论的方法,该研究通过在线参与者池收集了英国51家医疗科技初创企业的观点。采用开放式论文形式的定性数据技术收集数据,并采用主题编码过程进行内容分析。这些问题集中在建立或运营医疗保健初创企业时不同的制度不确定性或障碍上。研究结果揭示了这些以技术为基础的企业在医疗保健行业中遇到的几个宏观、中观和微观层面的障碍。这些被认为是系统性障碍,例如缺乏资金和程序问题;与部门有关的障碍,例如与市场有关的障碍;人的障碍,包括心理障碍和对新技术的抵制;以及实施障碍,例如操作和人员问题。研究局限性/启示本研究采用定性、开放式论文技术收集数据。未来的研究可能会使用混合方法来提供全面的见解。这项研究是在一个发达国家英国进行的。未来的工作可能会通过比较发达市场与新兴市场的挑战,并通过评估医疗保健初创企业的观点来扩展这些发现。实际意义本研究将帮助医疗保健部门和政府了解医疗技术创业的障碍和不确定性。政策制定者必须帮助初创企业,鼓励创业创新。规范和扶持政策将有所帮助。本文考察了创业公司宏观、中观和微观的不确定性。促进部门创业的政策制定者在制定政策指导方针时必须考虑到这些障碍。原创性/价值本研究对现有的关于科技初创企业的文献做出了贡献,特别是在医疗保健行业,并确定了这些初创企业面临的重大障碍。本研究综合了医疗科技创业不确定性的研究,并运用实证研究结果弥合了理论与实践之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM) is a significant contributor to the normative literature, offering both conceptual and practical insights supported by innovative discoveries that enrich the existing body of knowledge. Within its pages, JEIM presents research findings sourced from globally renowned experts. These contributions encompass scholarly examinations of cutting-edge theories and practices originating from leading research institutions. Additionally, the journal features inputs from senior business executives and consultants, who share their insights gleaned from specific enterprise case studies. Through these reports, readers benefit from a comparative analysis of different environmental contexts, facilitating valuable learning experiences. JEIM's distinctive blend of theoretical analysis and practical application fosters comprehensive discussions on commercial discoveries. This approach enhances the audience's comprehension of contemporary, applied, and rigorous information management practices, which extend across entire enterprises and their intricate supply chains.
期刊最新文献
Capabilities toward adoption of outcome-based contracts Unveiling the dark and scary side of metaverse: an in-depth qualitative investigation Building cybersecurity resilience: integrating defense and recovery investment strategies in an expected resilience framework Assessing the impact of digital service innovation (DSI) on business performance: the mediating effect of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Organisational cyber resilience: a heuristic for bridging foundations and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1