A benchmark study of data normalisation methods for PTR-TOF-MS exhaled breath metabolomics.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of breath research Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1088/1752-7163/ad08ce
Camille Roquencourt, Elodie Lamy, Emmanuelle Bardin, Philippe Devillier, Stanislas Grassin-Delyle
{"title":"A benchmark study of data normalisation methods for PTR-TOF-MS exhaled breath metabolomics.","authors":"Camille Roquencourt, Elodie Lamy, Emmanuelle Bardin, Philippe Devillier, Stanislas Grassin-Delyle","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/ad08ce","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Volatilomics is the branch of metabolomics dedicated to the analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath for medical diagnostic or therapeutic monitoring purposes. Real-time mass spectrometry (MS) technologies such as proton transfer reaction (PTR) MS are commonly used, and data normalisation is an important step to discard unwanted variation from non-biological sources, as batch effects and loss of sensitivity over time may be observed. As normalisation methods for real-time breath analysis have been poorly investigated, we aimed to benchmark known metabolomic data normalisation methods and apply them to PTR-MS data analysis. We compared seven normalisation methods, five statistically based and two using multiple standard metabolites, on two datasets from clinical trials for COVID-19 diagnosis in patients from the emergency department or intensive care unit. We evaluated different means of feature selection to select the standard metabolites, as well as the use of multiple repeat measurements of ambient air to train the normalisation methods. We show that the normalisation tools can correct for time-dependent drift. The methods that provided the best corrections for both cohorts were probabilistic quotient normalisation and normalisation using optimal selection of multiple internal standards. Normalisation also improved the diagnostic performance of the machine learning models, significantly increasing sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Our results highlight the importance of adding an appropriate normalisation step during the processing of PTR-MS data, which allows significant improvements in the predictive performance of statistical models.<b>Clinical trials</b>: VOC-COVID-Diag (EudraCT 2020-A02682-37); RECORDS trial (EudraCT 2020-000296-21).</p>","PeriodicalId":15306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of breath research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of breath research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/ad08ce","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volatilomics is the branch of metabolomics dedicated to the analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath for medical diagnostic or therapeutic monitoring purposes. Real-time mass spectrometry (MS) technologies such as proton transfer reaction (PTR) MS are commonly used, and data normalisation is an important step to discard unwanted variation from non-biological sources, as batch effects and loss of sensitivity over time may be observed. As normalisation methods for real-time breath analysis have been poorly investigated, we aimed to benchmark known metabolomic data normalisation methods and apply them to PTR-MS data analysis. We compared seven normalisation methods, five statistically based and two using multiple standard metabolites, on two datasets from clinical trials for COVID-19 diagnosis in patients from the emergency department or intensive care unit. We evaluated different means of feature selection to select the standard metabolites, as well as the use of multiple repeat measurements of ambient air to train the normalisation methods. We show that the normalisation tools can correct for time-dependent drift. The methods that provided the best corrections for both cohorts were probabilistic quotient normalisation and normalisation using optimal selection of multiple internal standards. Normalisation also improved the diagnostic performance of the machine learning models, significantly increasing sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Our results highlight the importance of adding an appropriate normalisation step during the processing of PTR-MS data, which allows significant improvements in the predictive performance of statistical models.Clinical trials: VOC-COVID-Diag (EudraCT 2020-A02682-37); RECORDS trial (EudraCT 2020-000296-21).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PTR-TOF-MS呼气代谢组学数据归一化方法的基准研究。
背景:Volatilomics是代谢组学的一个分支,专门用于分析呼出气体中的挥发性有机化合物(VOC),用于医学诊断或治疗监测目的。通常使用实时质谱技术,如质子转移反应质谱法(PTR-MS),数据归一化是丢弃非生物来源的不必要变化的重要步骤,因为可能会观察到批次效应和灵敏度随时间的损失。由于实时呼吸分析的归一化方法研究不足,我们旨在对已知的代谢组学数据归一化方法进行基准测试,并将其应用于PTR-MS数据分析。方法:我们在急诊科或重症监护室患者新冠肺炎诊断临床试验的两个数据集上比较了七种标准化方法,其中五种基于统计学,两种使用多种标准代谢物。我们评估了选择标准代谢物的不同特征选择方法,以及使用环境空气的多次重复测量来训练归一化方法。结果:我们表明归一化工具可以校正时间依赖漂移。为两个队列提供最佳校正的方法是概率商归一化和使用多个内部标准的最优选择的归一化。归一化还提高了机器学习模型的诊断性能,显著提高了诊断COVID-19的敏感性、特异性和ROC曲线下面积。结论:我们的结果强调了在PTR-MS数据处理过程中添加适当归一化步骤的重要性,这允许统计模型的预测性能的显著改进 ;临床试验:VOC新冠肺炎诊断(EudraCT 2020-A02682-37);RECORDS试验(EudraCT 2020-000296-21);关键词:数据标准化,PTR-TOF-MS,机器学习,呼气 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of breath research
Journal of breath research BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
21.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Breath Research is dedicated to all aspects of scientific breath research. The traditional focus is on analysis of volatile compounds and aerosols in exhaled breath for the investigation of exogenous exposures, metabolism, toxicology, health status and the diagnosis of disease and breath odours. The journal also welcomes other breath-related topics. Typical areas of interest include: Big laboratory instrumentation: describing new state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation capable of performing high-resolution discovery and targeted breath research; exploiting complex technologies drawn from other areas of biochemistry and genetics for breath research. Engineering solutions: developing new breath sampling technologies for condensate and aerosols, for chemical and optical sensors, for extraction and sample preparation methods, for automation and standardization, and for multiplex analyses to preserve the breath matrix and facilitating analytical throughput. Measure exhaled constituents (e.g. CO2, acetone, isoprene) as markers of human presence or mitigate such contaminants in enclosed environments. Human and animal in vivo studies: decoding the ''breath exposome'', implementing exposure and intervention studies, performing cross-sectional and case-control research, assaying immune and inflammatory response, and testing mammalian host response to infections and exogenous exposures to develop information directly applicable to systems biology. Studying inhalation toxicology; inhaled breath as a source of internal dose; resultant blood, breath and urinary biomarkers linked to inhalation pathway. Cellular and molecular level in vitro studies. Clinical, pharmacological and forensic applications. Mathematical, statistical and graphical data interpretation.
期刊最新文献
Correlations between Propofol Concentration in Exhaled Breath and BIS in Patients undergoing Thyroid Surgery. Halitosis in oral lichen planus patients. Validation of a sensor system for the measurement of breath ammonia using selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry. Therapeutic efficacy of a probiotic preparation on idiopathic halitosis: a retrospective observational study. Effectiveness of a combination of laccase and green coffee extract on oral malodor: A comparative, randomized, controlled, evaluator-blind, parallel-group trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1