Efficacy of pneumatic retinopexy in young adults with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

IF 2.3 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-10-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25158414231208279
Zeynep İpekli, Seren Pehlivanoğlu, Özgür Artunay
{"title":"Efficacy of pneumatic retinopexy in young adults with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.","authors":"Zeynep İpekli,&nbsp;Seren Pehlivanoğlu,&nbsp;Özgür Artunay","doi":"10.1177/25158414231208279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In young adults with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, pneumatic retinopexy can be a cost-effective and minimally invasive highly effective method in suitable cases.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the role of pneumatic retinopexy in the treatment of young adults with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and the factors that may affect the success of pneumatic retinopexy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 67 eyes of 67 patients aged between 21 and 40 who underwent pneumatic retinopexy (PR) between January 2015 and June 2021 for primary RRD. We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic factors that may affect the success of PR, such as preoperative age, best corrected visual acuity, tear site, lens condition, and axial length.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PR was successful in 61.2% of the patients, whereas 38.8% required secondary surgery. Between the group that had a single surgery (Group 1) and the group that required secondary surgery (Group 2) the tear location, axial length, and volumes of gases used were statistically different (<i>p</i> = 0.04, <i>p</i> < 0.001, and <i>p</i> = 0.02, respectively). There was a significant difference in visual acuity before and after surgery in the group that was successful with a single surgery (Friedman χ<sup>2</sup> = 40.051, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraocular pressure (<i>p</i> > 0.05), and glaucoma was not observed in the postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since it is a minimally invasive and cost-effective method that provides rapid visual rehabilitation, it can be considered as first-line therapy in young adults who are suitable for PR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23054,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","volume":"15 ","pages":"25158414231208279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414231208279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In young adults with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, pneumatic retinopexy can be a cost-effective and minimally invasive highly effective method in suitable cases.

Objectives: To evaluate the role of pneumatic retinopexy in the treatment of young adults with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and the factors that may affect the success of pneumatic retinopexy.

Design: Retrospective study.

Methods: The study included 67 eyes of 67 patients aged between 21 and 40 who underwent pneumatic retinopexy (PR) between January 2015 and June 2021 for primary RRD. We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic factors that may affect the success of PR, such as preoperative age, best corrected visual acuity, tear site, lens condition, and axial length.

Results: PR was successful in 61.2% of the patients, whereas 38.8% required secondary surgery. Between the group that had a single surgery (Group 1) and the group that required secondary surgery (Group 2) the tear location, axial length, and volumes of gases used were statistically different (p = 0.04, p < 0.001, and p = 0.02, respectively). There was a significant difference in visual acuity before and after surgery in the group that was successful with a single surgery (Friedman χ2 = 40.051, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraocular pressure (p > 0.05), and glaucoma was not observed in the postoperative period.

Conclusion: Since it is a minimally invasive and cost-effective method that provides rapid visual rehabilitation, it can be considered as first-line therapy in young adults who are suitable for PR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气动视网膜固定术治疗年轻成人孔源性视网膜脱离的疗效。
背景:在患有孔源性视网膜脱离的年轻人中,在合适的情况下,气动视网膜固定术是一种成本效益高、微创高效的方法。目的:评价气动视网膜固定术在年轻成人孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)治疗中的作用,以及可能影响气动视网膜修复成功的因素。设计:回顾性研究。方法:该研究包括67名年龄在21岁至40岁之间的患者的67只眼睛,这些患者在2015年1月至2021年6月期间接受了气动视网膜固定术(PR)治疗原发性RRD。我们回顾性分析了可能影响PR成功的预后因素,如术前年龄、最佳矫正视力、撕裂部位、晶状体状况和轴长。结果:61.2%的患者PR成功,38.8%的患者需要二次手术。在单次手术组(第1组)和需要二次手术的组(第2组)之间,撕裂位置、轴向长度和使用的气体体积在统计学上有差异(p = 0.04,p p = 分别为0.02)。在单次手术成功的组中,手术前后的视力有显著差异(Friedmanχ2 = 40.051,p p > 0.05),术后未观察到青光眼。结论:由于它是一种微创且成本效益高的方法,可以提供快速的视觉康复,因此可以作为适合PR的年轻人的一线治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The efficacy and safety of continuous blanket suture for severe recurrent pterygium with symblepharon. The experiences of visually impaired military veterans with Charles Bonnet syndrome. Are depression, anxiety and loneliness associated with visual hallucinations in younger adults with Charles Bonnet syndrome? Clinical characteristics of allergic conjunctivitis in the Southern region of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Optical coherence tomography angiography to assess for retinal vascular changes in Neuro-Sjögren.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1