A Simple Intervention to Improve Equity in Obstetric Research.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Equity Pub Date : 2023-10-16 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0073
Rebecca Feldman Hamm, Meaghan G McCabe, Abike James, Samuel Parry, Lisa D Levine
{"title":"A Simple Intervention to Improve Equity in Obstetric Research.","authors":"Rebecca Feldman Hamm,&nbsp;Meaghan G McCabe,&nbsp;Abike James,&nbsp;Samuel Parry,&nbsp;Lisa D Levine","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate if a simple intervention, including formation of a Research Equity Committee and a dashboard detailing study approach and enrollment statistics by race, could improve equitable inclusion in obstetric research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our intervention had four components: (1) research personnel submitted dashboards every 3 months to the Research Equity Committee; (2) approach and enrollment by race were compared with expected racial breakdown; (3) study teams with rates of approach and/or enrollment of black birthing people below goal met with the committee for root cause analysis (RCA) and action planning; (4) all dashboards, RCAs, and action plans were presented at 3-month intervals. We prospectively evaluated the impact of this intervention on the inclusion of self-reported black birthing people in actively enrolling obstetrical studies at an academic university from July 2021 to June 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven qualifying prospective studies submitted 23 equity dashboards, which encompassed 692 patients. Six RCAs and action planning were held. Themes of developed action plans included: (1) standardizing how, when, and which patients to approach to eliminate approach bias, (2) standardized scripts for patient recruitment, and (3) study expansion to more diverse clinics. All four studies that underwent an RCA demonstrated improvements after the intervention; however, only one study demonstrated a statistically significant increase in approach (<i>p</i>=0.002) and enrollment (<i>p</i>=0.02) of black birthing people across the study period.</p><p><strong>Discussion and health equity implications: </strong>A simple intervention can improve approach and enrollment of black birthing people in obstetric research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"7 1","pages":"692-698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate if a simple intervention, including formation of a Research Equity Committee and a dashboard detailing study approach and enrollment statistics by race, could improve equitable inclusion in obstetric research.

Methods: Our intervention had four components: (1) research personnel submitted dashboards every 3 months to the Research Equity Committee; (2) approach and enrollment by race were compared with expected racial breakdown; (3) study teams with rates of approach and/or enrollment of black birthing people below goal met with the committee for root cause analysis (RCA) and action planning; (4) all dashboards, RCAs, and action plans were presented at 3-month intervals. We prospectively evaluated the impact of this intervention on the inclusion of self-reported black birthing people in actively enrolling obstetrical studies at an academic university from July 2021 to June 2022.

Results: Seven qualifying prospective studies submitted 23 equity dashboards, which encompassed 692 patients. Six RCAs and action planning were held. Themes of developed action plans included: (1) standardizing how, when, and which patients to approach to eliminate approach bias, (2) standardized scripts for patient recruitment, and (3) study expansion to more diverse clinics. All four studies that underwent an RCA demonstrated improvements after the intervention; however, only one study demonstrated a statistically significant increase in approach (p=0.002) and enrollment (p=0.02) of black birthing people across the study period.

Discussion and health equity implications: A simple intervention can improve approach and enrollment of black birthing people in obstetric research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高产科研究公平性的简单干预措施。
引言:评估一项简单的干预措施,包括成立一个研究公平委员会和一个按种族详细说明研究方法和入学统计数据的仪表盘,是否可以提高产科研究的公平包容性。方法:我们的干预包括四个部分:(1)研究人员每3个月向研究公平委员会提交一次仪表盘;(2) 按种族划分的方法和入学人数与预期的种族细分进行了比较;(3) 黑人出生者的接近率和/或登记率低于目标的研究团队与根本原因分析(RCA)和行动计划委员会会面;(4) 所有仪表盘、RCA和行动计划每隔3个月提交一次。我们前瞻性评估了这一干预措施对2021年7月至2022年6月在一所学术大学积极参与产科研究的自我报告黑人出生者的影响。结果:7项符合条件的前瞻性研究提交了23个公平仪表盘,涵盖692名患者。举行了六次区域协调行动和行动规划。制定的行动计划的主题包括:(1)标准化如何、何时以及接触哪些患者,以消除方法偏见,(2)标准化患者招募脚本,以及(3)将研究扩展到更多样化的诊所。所有四项接受RCA的研究都表明,干预后情况有所改善;然而,只有一项研究表明,在整个研究期间,黑人出生者的方法(p=0.002)和登记人数(p=0.02)在统计学上显著增加。讨论和健康公平影响:一个简单的干预措施可以改善产科研究中黑人分娩者的方法和登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Getting Ours? "Girlbossing" and the Ethics of Nurse Reimbursement Models. "She's a Family Member": How Community Health Workers Impact Perinatal Mothers' Stress Through Social-Emotional Support and Connections to Programs and Resources. Diversifying Doulas Initiative: Improving Maternal Health Outcomes in People of Color Through Doula Care. Improving Weight Bias Awareness Among Providers in the Sexual and Reproductive Health care Setting. Racial (In)Equity in South Los Angeles-Community Centered Experiences with COVID-19 Syndemics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1