Barriers to finding psychology postdoctoral training opportunities in intensive care settings.

IF 16.4 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1037/rep0000524

Andrew D May, Jamie L Tingey, Kirk J Stucky, Quinn D Kellerman, Megan M Hosey

{"title":"Barriers to finding psychology postdoctoral training opportunities in intensive care settings.","authors":"Andrew D May, Jamie L Tingey, Kirk J Stucky, Quinn D Kellerman, Megan M Hosey","doi":"10.1037/rep0000524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose/objective: U.S. health organizations, including Division 22 of the American Psychological Association, the Society for Critical Care Medicine, and the American Thoracic Society advocate for psychological treatment that improves long-term outcomes in critical illness survivors. However, limited information exists with regard to psychology training opportunities in intensive care settings. We aim to identify and describe (a) existing psychology programs with training in intensive care settings and (b) barriers to finding these training opportunities.Research method/design: Using aspects of the Arksey and O'Malley Framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting checklist as guides, two independent reviewers searched the Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers (APPIC) Directory and Universal Psychology Postdoctoral Directory (UPPD) to identify programs with training experiences in intensive care settings.Results: Searching the APPIC Directory did not reliably or accurately identify training opportunities in intensive care settings. Thus, only programs identified in the more reliable UPPD search were considered for inclusion. After duplicates were removed, searches using the UPPD yielded 31 programs for review. Of those, 22 programs met inclusion, offering heterogeneous training in intensive care settings.Conclusions/implications: These results suggest few opportunities exist for psychology training in intensive care settings and available opportunities are difficult to identify using standard search methods. The identified challenges also emphasize the need for advanced search features for training opportunities within APPIC/UPPD and/or a list of programs offering these training opportunities. Our results highlight the importance of program descriptions that accurately and comprehensively reflect training opportunities-particularly relating to opportunities in intensive care settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objective: U.S. health organizations, including Division 22 of the American Psychological Association, the Society for Critical Care Medicine, and the American Thoracic Society advocate for psychological treatment that improves long-term outcomes in critical illness survivors. However, limited information exists with regard to psychology training opportunities in intensive care settings. We aim to identify and describe (a) existing psychology programs with training in intensive care settings and (b) barriers to finding these training opportunities.

Research method/design: Using aspects of the Arksey and O'Malley Framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting checklist as guides, two independent reviewers searched the Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers (APPIC) Directory and Universal Psychology Postdoctoral Directory (UPPD) to identify programs with training experiences in intensive care settings.

Results: Searching the APPIC Directory did not reliably or accurately identify training opportunities in intensive care settings. Thus, only programs identified in the more reliable UPPD search were considered for inclusion. After duplicates were removed, searches using the UPPD yielded 31 programs for review. Of those, 22 programs met inclusion, offering heterogeneous training in intensive care settings.

Conclusions/implications: These results suggest few opportunities exist for psychology training in intensive care settings and available opportunities are difficult to identify using standard search methods. The identified challenges also emphasize the need for advanced search features for training opportunities within APPIC/UPPD and/or a list of programs offering these training opportunities. Our results highlight the importance of program descriptions that accurately and comprehensively reflect training opportunities-particularly relating to opportunities in intensive care settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

在重症监护环境中寻找心理学博士后培训机会的障碍。

目的/目的：美国卫生组织，包括美国心理协会第22分部、重症医学会和美国胸科学会，倡导心理治疗，以改善危重症幸存者的长期预后。然而，关于重症监护环境中心理培训机会的信息有限。我们的目的是确定和描述（a）在重症监护环境中进行培训的现有心理学项目，以及（b）寻找这些培训机会的障碍。研究方法/设计：使用Arksey和O'Malley框架的各个方面以及系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查报告清单的Meta Analysis扩展作为指南，两名独立评审员搜索了心理学协会博士后和实习中心（APPIC）目录和通用心理学博士后目录（UPPD），以确定在重症监护环境中有培训经验的项目。结果：搜索APPIC目录并不能可靠或准确地确定重症监护环境中的培训机会。因此，只有在更可靠的UPPD搜索中确定的程序才被考虑纳入。删除重复项后，使用UPPD进行的搜索产生了31个程序供审查。其中，22个项目符合纳入条件，在重症监护环境中提供不同类型的培训。结论/启示：这些结果表明，在重症监护环境中，几乎没有心理培训的机会，而且使用标准搜索方法很难确定可用的机会。所确定的挑战还强调了在APPIC/UPPD和/或提供这些培训机会的项目列表中对培训机会的高级搜索功能的需求。我们的研究结果强调了项目描述的重要性，这些描述准确、全面地反映了培训机会，尤其是与重症监护环境中的机会有关的培训机会。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2023 APA，保留所有权利）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.

期刊最新文献

Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.