E-Health Interventions for Older Adults With Frailty: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-27 DOI:10.5535/arm.23090
Hyeong-Wook Han, Si-Woon Park, Doo Young Kim, Bum-Suk Lee, Daham Kim, Namo Jeon, Yun-Jung Yang
{"title":"E-Health Interventions for Older Adults With Frailty: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Hyeong-Wook Han,&nbsp;Si-Woon Park,&nbsp;Doo Young Kim,&nbsp;Bum-Suk Lee,&nbsp;Daham Kim,&nbsp;Namo Jeon,&nbsp;Yun-Jung Yang","doi":"10.5535/arm.23090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>: To systematically review the efficacy of e-Health interventions on physical performance, activity and quality of life in older adults with sarcopenia or frailty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>: A systematic review was conducted by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, Web of Science, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database for experimental studies published in English from 1990 to 2021. E-Health studies investigating physical activity, physical performance, quality of life, and activity of daily living assessment in adults aged ≥65 years with sarcopenia or frailty were selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: Among the 3,164 identified articles screened, a total of 4 studies complied with the inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogeneous by participant characteristics, type of e-Health intervention, and outcome measurement. Age criteria for participant selection and sex distribution were different between studies. Each study used different criteria for frailty, and no study used sarcopenia as a selection criteria. E-Health interventions were various across studies. Two studies used frailty status as an outcome measure and showed conflicting results. Muscle strength was assessed in 2 studies, and meta-analysis showed statistically significant improvement after intervention (standardized mean difference, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.94; p=0.80, I<sup>2</sup>=0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>: This systematic review found insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of e-Health interventions. Nevertheless, the studies included in this review showed positive effects of e-Health interventions on improving muscle strength, physical activity, and quality of life in older adults with frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":47738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","volume":"47 5","pages":"348-357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.23090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: : To systematically review the efficacy of e-Health interventions on physical performance, activity and quality of life in older adults with sarcopenia or frailty.

Methods: : A systematic review was conducted by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, Web of Science, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database for experimental studies published in English from 1990 to 2021. E-Health studies investigating physical activity, physical performance, quality of life, and activity of daily living assessment in adults aged ≥65 years with sarcopenia or frailty were selected.

Results: : Among the 3,164 identified articles screened, a total of 4 studies complied with the inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogeneous by participant characteristics, type of e-Health intervention, and outcome measurement. Age criteria for participant selection and sex distribution were different between studies. Each study used different criteria for frailty, and no study used sarcopenia as a selection criteria. E-Health interventions were various across studies. Two studies used frailty status as an outcome measure and showed conflicting results. Muscle strength was assessed in 2 studies, and meta-analysis showed statistically significant improvement after intervention (standardized mean difference, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.94; p=0.80, I2=0%).

Conclusion: : This systematic review found insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of e-Health interventions. Nevertheless, the studies included in this review showed positive effects of e-Health interventions on improving muscle strength, physical activity, and quality of life in older adults with frailty.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年体弱者的电子健康干预:一项系统综述。
目的:系统评价电子健康干预措施对患有少肌症或虚弱的老年人的身体表现、活动和生活质量的疗效。方法:通过检索MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library、CINHAL、Web of Science和物理疗法证据数据库,对1990年至2021年以英语发表的实验研究进行系统综述。选择电子健康研究,调查年龄≥65岁的少肌症或虚弱成年人的身体活动、身体表现、生活质量和日常生活活动评估。结果:在筛选出的3164篇已确定的文章中,共有4项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究在参与者特征、电子健康干预类型和结果测量方面具有异质性。不同研究的参与者选择和性别分布的年龄标准不同。每项研究都使用了不同的虚弱标准,没有一项研究将少肌症作为选择标准。研究中的电子健康干预措施各不相同。两项研究使用虚弱状态作为结果衡量标准,结果相互矛盾。在2项研究中评估了肌肉力量,荟萃分析显示干预后肌肉力量有统计学意义的改善(标准化平均差,0.51;95%置信区间,0.07-0.94;p=0.80,I2=0%)。结论:本系统综述发现没有足够的证据支持电子健康干预的有效性。尽管如此,本综述中的研究表明,电子健康干预措施对改善老年体弱者的肌肉力量、体力活动和生活质量有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Stroke Outcome Assessments and Automated Tractography Fractional Anisotropy Incorporating Age. Validation of Korean Version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (K-OCS), a Post Stroke-Specific Cognitive Screening Tool. Nerve Conduction Study, Sympathetic Skin Response Test, and Demographic Correlates in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Response: Efficacy and Safety of High Density LED Irradiation Therapy for Patients With Hand Osteoarthritis: A Single-Center Clinical Study (Ann Rehabil Med 2024;48:50-6). Correction: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Method for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1