Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects of Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment on Food Cue Reactivity.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000702
Ariana M Chao, Thomas A Wadden, Wen Cao, Yingjie Zhou, Delphina Maldonado, Michelle I Cardel, Gary D Foster, James Loughead
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects of Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment on Food Cue Reactivity.","authors":"Ariana M Chao, Thomas A Wadden, Wen Cao, Yingjie Zhou, Delphina Maldonado, Michelle I Cardel, Gary D Foster, James Loughead","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is not known whether behavioral weight loss can attenuate blood oxygen level-dependent responses to food stimuli.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This randomized controlled trial assessed the effects of a commercially available behavioral weight loss program (WW, WeightWatchers) compared to a wait-list control on blood oxygen level-dependent response to food cues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Females with obesity ( N = 61) were randomized to behavioral weight loss or wait-list control. At baseline and follow-up, participants completed assessments that included functional magnetic resonance imaging scans to assess response to images of high-calorie foods (HCF) or low-calorie foods (LCF), and neutral objects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant between-group differences in change from baseline to follow-up in any regions of the brain in response to viewing HCF or LCF. From baseline to follow-up, participants in behavioral weight loss, compared with wait-list control, reported significantly greater increases in desire for LCF. Changes in liking and palatability of LCF and liking, palatability, and desire for HCF did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Behavioral weight loss was associated with increased desire for LCF without changes in neural reactivity to food cues. These results suggest that alteration of neurological processes underlying responsiveness to food is difficult to achieve through behavioral weight management alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"91-100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10922238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is not known whether behavioral weight loss can attenuate blood oxygen level-dependent responses to food stimuli.

Objectives: This randomized controlled trial assessed the effects of a commercially available behavioral weight loss program (WW, WeightWatchers) compared to a wait-list control on blood oxygen level-dependent response to food cues.

Methods: Females with obesity ( N = 61) were randomized to behavioral weight loss or wait-list control. At baseline and follow-up, participants completed assessments that included functional magnetic resonance imaging scans to assess response to images of high-calorie foods (HCF) or low-calorie foods (LCF), and neutral objects.

Results: There were no significant between-group differences in change from baseline to follow-up in any regions of the brain in response to viewing HCF or LCF. From baseline to follow-up, participants in behavioral weight loss, compared with wait-list control, reported significantly greater increases in desire for LCF. Changes in liking and palatability of LCF and liking, palatability, and desire for HCF did not differ between groups.

Discussion: Behavioral weight loss was associated with increased desire for LCF without changes in neural reactivity to food cues. These results suggest that alteration of neurological processes underlying responsiveness to food is difficult to achieve through behavioral weight management alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为减肥治疗对食物线索反应性影响的随机对照试验。
背景:目前尚不清楚行为减肥是否会减弱对食物刺激的血氧水平依赖性反应。目的:这项随机对照试验评估了商业行为减肥计划(WeightWatchers)与等待名单对照对食物线索的血氧水平依赖性反应的影响。方法:将肥胖女性(N=61)随机分为行为减肥组或等待名单对照组。在基线和随访时,参与者完成了评估,包括功能性磁共振成像扫描,以评估对高热量食物(HCF)或低热量食物(LCF)和中性物体图像的反应。结果:在观察HCF或LCF时,大脑任何区域从基线到随访的变化在组间没有显著差异。从基线到随访,与等待名单对照组相比,行为减肥参与者对LCF的渴望显著增加。LCF的喜好和适口性以及对HCF的喜好、适口性和欲望的变化在各组之间没有差异。讨论:行为减肥与对LCF的渴望增加有关,而对食物线索的神经反应没有变化。这些结果表明,仅仅通过行为体重管理很难改变对食物反应的神经过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
期刊最新文献
Preparing PhD Students for Tenure-Track Faculty Positions. Cognitive Interventions in Heart Failure Segue to Thoughts on Symptom Science in Nursing Research. Health Implications of Black Identity Among Latinos: A Call for Afro-Latina Representation in Maternal Child Health Research. In Search of Nursing Science. Nursing Science and the Law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1