Predictive Value of the Lipoprotein(a) to Prealbumin Ratio and of the NT-proBNP to LVEF Ratio for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Surgery Forum Pub Date : 2023-10-07 DOI:10.59958/hsf.6681
Yingqian Zhang, Fangyuan Shi
{"title":"Predictive Value of the Lipoprotein(a) to Prealbumin Ratio and of the NT-proBNP to LVEF Ratio for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.","authors":"Yingqian Zhang,&nbsp;Fangyuan Shi","doi":"10.59958/hsf.6681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to prealbumin (PA) ratio and the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ratio for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 1:1 matched case-control study was performed to retrospectively analyze ACS patients who underwent PCI from January 2022 to June 2022. Patients with MACE were selected as the case group (n = 55), and age- and gender-matched patients without MACE were selected as the control group (n = 55). Clinical data for the two groups was compared by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Risk factors and the odds ratio (OR) for MACE in ACS patients were evaluated, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were used to evaluate the Lp(a)/PA ratio, the NT-proBNP/LVEF ratio, and their combination for the prediction of MACE in ACS patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MACE and non-MACE groups showed statistically significant differences for time from onset to PCI, LVEF, NT-proBNP, white blood cell (WBC), Lp(a), PA, Lp(a)/PA, NT-proBNP/LVEF, number of catheterizations, number of implanted stents >2, and support diameter >3 (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LVEF, Lp(a)/PA and NT-proBNP/LVEF were independent risk factors for MACE. ROC curve analysis for Lp(a)/PA showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of MACE was 0.779 (0.693-0.864), the cut-off point was 1.36, the sensitivity was 69.1%, and the specificity was 74.5%. The AUC for NT-proBNP/LVEF in predicting MACE was 0.827 (0.75-0.904), the cut-off point was 61.04, the sensitivity was 65.5%, and the specificity was 92.7%. For the combination of Lp(a)/PA and NT-proBNP/LVEF, the AUC for the prediction of MACE was 0.889 (0.830-0.947), the cut-off point was 0.37, the sensitivity was 81.8%, and the specificity was 81.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of Lp(a)/PA and NT-proBNP/LVEF at admission showed good predictive value for the occurrence of MACE in ACS patients after PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":51056,"journal":{"name":"Heart Surgery Forum","volume":"26 5","pages":"E470-E477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Surgery Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.6681","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to prealbumin (PA) ratio and the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ratio for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: A 1:1 matched case-control study was performed to retrospectively analyze ACS patients who underwent PCI from January 2022 to June 2022. Patients with MACE were selected as the case group (n = 55), and age- and gender-matched patients without MACE were selected as the control group (n = 55). Clinical data for the two groups was compared by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Risk factors and the odds ratio (OR) for MACE in ACS patients were evaluated, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were used to evaluate the Lp(a)/PA ratio, the NT-proBNP/LVEF ratio, and their combination for the prediction of MACE in ACS patients.

Results: The MACE and non-MACE groups showed statistically significant differences for time from onset to PCI, LVEF, NT-proBNP, white blood cell (WBC), Lp(a), PA, Lp(a)/PA, NT-proBNP/LVEF, number of catheterizations, number of implanted stents >2, and support diameter >3 (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LVEF, Lp(a)/PA and NT-proBNP/LVEF were independent risk factors for MACE. ROC curve analysis for Lp(a)/PA showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of MACE was 0.779 (0.693-0.864), the cut-off point was 1.36, the sensitivity was 69.1%, and the specificity was 74.5%. The AUC for NT-proBNP/LVEF in predicting MACE was 0.827 (0.75-0.904), the cut-off point was 61.04, the sensitivity was 65.5%, and the specificity was 92.7%. For the combination of Lp(a)/PA and NT-proBNP/LVEF, the AUC for the prediction of MACE was 0.889 (0.830-0.947), the cut-off point was 0.37, the sensitivity was 81.8%, and the specificity was 81.8%.

Conclusion: The combination of Lp(a)/PA and NT-proBNP/LVEF at admission showed good predictive value for the occurrence of MACE in ACS patients after PCI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂蛋白(a)与前白蛋白比值和NT-proBNP与LVEF比值对急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要心血管不良事件的预测价值。
目的:探讨脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]与前白蛋白(PA)的比值和N-末端脑钠肽原(NT-proBNP)与左心室射血分数(LVEF)的比值对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后主要心血管不良事件(MACE)的预测作用对2022年1月至2022年6月接受PCI的ACS患者进行回顾性分析。有MACE的患者被选为病例组(n=55),没有MACE的年龄和性别匹配的患者被选择为对照组(n=5)。通过单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析比较两组的临床数据。评估ACS患者MACE的危险因素和比值比(OR),并使用受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)评估Lp(a)/PA比率、NT-proBNP/LVEF比率及其组合用于预测ACS患者的MACE。结果:MACE组和非MACE组从发病到PCI的时间、LVEF、NT-proBNP、白细胞(WBC)、Lp(a)、PA、Lp,Lp(a)/PA和NT-proBNP/LVEF是MACE的独立危险因素。Lp(a)/PA的ROC曲线分析显示,预测MACE的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.779(0.693-0.864),临界点为1.36,敏感性为69.1%,特异性为74.5%。NT-proBNP/LVEF预测MACE时的AUC为0.827(0.75-0.904),临界值为61.04,敏感性为65.5%,Lp(a)/PA和NT-proBNP/LVEF联合应用对ACS患者PCI术后MACE的预测AUC为0.889(0.830-0.947),临界点为0.37,敏感性为81.8%,特异性为81.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Surgery Forum
Heart Surgery Forum 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Heart Surgery Forum® is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal seeking original investigative and clinical work on any subject germane to the science or practice of modern cardiac care. The HSF publishes original scientific reports, collective reviews, case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. New manuscripts are reviewed by reviewers for originality, content, relevancy and adherence to scientific principles in a double-blind process. The HSF features a streamlined submission and peer review process with an anticipated completion time of 30 to 60 days from the date of receipt of the original manuscript. Authors are encouraged to submit full color images and video that will be included in the web version of the journal at no charge.
期刊最新文献
You Either Pull Freight or You are Freight-Admonition #1 for Third Year Medical Students on a Surgery Service. Left Atrial Low Voltage Areas Predicts Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Catheter Ablation: A Meta-Analysis. A Meta-Analysis for Postoperative Alternations of Aortic Coarctation. Effects of Phase Ⅰ Cardiac Rehabilitation Combined with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy on Cardiac Function, Exercise Capacity and Mental Health in Patients after Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Study. Effects of Concomitant CABG on Outcomes in Veterans Who Require Surgery for Endocarditis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1