Postpartum family planning uptake and its associated factors among postpartum women in Asosa zone, Benishangul Gumuz regional state, Ethiopia: a facility-based cross-sectional study.

IF 2.2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception and reproductive medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1186/s40834-023-00252-w
Rut Oljira, Temesgen Tilahun, Gashaw Tiruneh, Tariku Tesfaye Bekuma, Motuma Getachew, Assefa Seme, Ayantu Getahun, Lemane Dereje, Alemnesh Mosisa, Ebisa Turi
{"title":"Postpartum family planning uptake and its associated factors among postpartum women in Asosa zone, Benishangul Gumuz regional state, Ethiopia: a facility-based cross-sectional study.","authors":"Rut Oljira,&nbsp;Temesgen Tilahun,&nbsp;Gashaw Tiruneh,&nbsp;Tariku Tesfaye Bekuma,&nbsp;Motuma Getachew,&nbsp;Assefa Seme,&nbsp;Ayantu Getahun,&nbsp;Lemane Dereje,&nbsp;Alemnesh Mosisa,&nbsp;Ebisa Turi","doi":"10.1186/s40834-023-00252-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first twelve months after a woman has given birth is crucial for the use of contraceptives to prevent unintended pregnancy. Most women, especially in developing countries, do not realize that they are at risk for pregnancy during this period. Due to this, contraceptive use by women is ignored at this time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the associated factors of postpartum family planning (PPFP) service uptake in the Asosa zone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 396 postpartum women in the Asosa zone. An interviewer-administered, structured, and pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data. Data entry and cleaning were done using Epi Info version 7.0 and analyzed using SPSS version 25 software. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with postpartum family planning uptake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the study participants, 384 (97.2%), had heard about at least one method of family planning. Nearly two-thirds of the study participants (64.1%) had resumed sexual intercourse. Only 53.5% of the participants started using PPFP. Injectable forms (54.7%) and implants (26.4%) were the most commonly used methods. More than one-fourth (27.4%) did not use their preferred methods. Family planning use before index pregnancy (AOR = 4.8, 95% CI: 2.65, 8.82), previous use of PPFP (AOR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.33, 4.38)] and health facility delivery (AOR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.46, 5.49)] were significantly associated with uptake of postpartum family planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>Postpartum family planning uptake in the study area was low. Uptake of PPFP was correlated with prior family planning usage and delivery at a healthcare facility. Given these factors, we recommend all study area stakeholders to promote family planning use among women of reproductive age and to encourage deliveries at healthcare facilities. Designing a method to reach women who give birth at home for a variety of reasons is also advisable. Unavailability of different forms of FP also made the participants not use the preferred option. Therefore, we recommend the stakeholders in the study area to avail variety of FP methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10619311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-023-00252-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The first twelve months after a woman has given birth is crucial for the use of contraceptives to prevent unintended pregnancy. Most women, especially in developing countries, do not realize that they are at risk for pregnancy during this period. Due to this, contraceptive use by women is ignored at this time.

Objective: This study assessed the associated factors of postpartum family planning (PPFP) service uptake in the Asosa zone.

Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 396 postpartum women in the Asosa zone. An interviewer-administered, structured, and pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data. Data entry and cleaning were done using Epi Info version 7.0 and analyzed using SPSS version 25 software. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with postpartum family planning uptake.

Results: The majority of the study participants, 384 (97.2%), had heard about at least one method of family planning. Nearly two-thirds of the study participants (64.1%) had resumed sexual intercourse. Only 53.5% of the participants started using PPFP. Injectable forms (54.7%) and implants (26.4%) were the most commonly used methods. More than one-fourth (27.4%) did not use their preferred methods. Family planning use before index pregnancy (AOR = 4.8, 95% CI: 2.65, 8.82), previous use of PPFP (AOR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.33, 4.38)] and health facility delivery (AOR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.46, 5.49)] were significantly associated with uptake of postpartum family planning.

Conclusion and recommendation: Postpartum family planning uptake in the study area was low. Uptake of PPFP was correlated with prior family planning usage and delivery at a healthcare facility. Given these factors, we recommend all study area stakeholders to promote family planning use among women of reproductive age and to encourage deliveries at healthcare facilities. Designing a method to reach women who give birth at home for a variety of reasons is also advisable. Unavailability of different forms of FP also made the participants not use the preferred option. Therefore, we recommend the stakeholders in the study area to avail variety of FP methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚Benishangul-Gumuz地区Asosa地区产后妇女的产后计划生育及其相关因素:一项基于设施的横断面研究。
背景:妇女分娩后的前12个月对于使用避孕药具预防意外怀孕至关重要。大多数妇女,特别是发展中国家的妇女,没有意识到她们在此期间有怀孕的风险。因此,妇女使用避孕药具的情况在这个时候被忽视了。目的:本研究评估了Asosa地区产后计划生育(PPFP)服务接受的相关因素。方法:对阿索萨地区396名产后妇女进行了一项基于设施的横断面研究。采用访谈者管理、结构化和预先测试的问卷来收集数据。使用Epi Info 7.0版进行数据输入和清理,并使用SPSS 25版软件进行分析。采用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定与产后计划生育相关的因素。结果:大多数研究参与者384人(97.2%)听说过至少一种计划生育方法。近三分之二的研究参与者(64.1%)已经恢复性交。只有53.5%的参与者开始使用PPFP。注射形式(54.7%)和植入物(26.4%)是最常用的方法。超过四分之一(27.4%)的人没有使用他们喜欢的方法。指数妊娠前计划生育的使用(AOR = 4.8,95%可信区间:2.65,8.82),既往使用PPFP(AOR = 2.4,95%置信区间:1.33,4.38)]和卫生设施交付(AOR = 2.8,95%CI:1.46,5.49)]与产后计划生育的实施显著相关。结论和建议:研究地区的产后计划生育率较低。PPFP的摄入与之前在医疗机构的计划生育使用和分娩有关。鉴于这些因素,我们建议所有研究领域的利益相关者在育龄妇女中推广计划生育,并鼓励在医疗机构分娩。设计一种方法来帮助出于各种原因在家分娩的妇女也是可取的。不同形式的FP的不可用性也使得参与者没有使用首选选项。因此,我们建议研究区域的利益相关者采用各种FP方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
From theories of contraceptive use to human rights principles: implications for indicators on the supply and demand side. Factors associated with modern contraceptive utilization among reproductive age women in Cambodia; evidenced by the recent Cambodia demographic and health survey. Barriers and enablers to utilisation of postpartum long-acting reversible contraception in Eastern Uganda: a qualitative study. Comparative effectiveness of sildenafil citrate and estradiol valerate as adjuvants during clomiphene citrate-assisted ovarian stimulation cycles in patients with unexplained infertility: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Barriers to modern contraceptive utilization in Ethiopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1