Defining the Limits of Acceptable Parenthood: Reproductive Governance in Brazil.

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Medical Anthropology Pub Date : 2024-01-02 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1080/01459740.2023.2276708
Claudia Fonseca, Lucia Scalco
{"title":"Defining the Limits of Acceptable Parenthood: Reproductive Governance in Brazil.","authors":"Claudia Fonseca, Lucia Scalco","doi":"10.1080/01459740.2023.2276708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drawing on sources relating to the Brazilian scenario - from ethnographic research in lower-income neighorhoods to the analysis of official documents and public debates - we build on cases of forced child removals to explore the intersectional dynamics of class, race, and gender that underlie institutionalized practices of discrimination against poverty-stricken families. After first addressing the influence of recent global trends in child-protection policy, we observe how adoption procedures in Brazil have been increasingly facilitated by the resignification of rights and corresponding changes in the country's legal infrastructures. Next, asking what sort of authoritative knowledge is invoked to define a child's best interests, we reflect on the role played by biomedicine in appraising the limits of acceptable parenthood. Guided by the notion of stratified reproduction, our investigation of these political, scientific, and moral technologies suggests plausible connections between policies that condition the demand for and the supply of adoptable children.</p>","PeriodicalId":47460,"journal":{"name":"Medical Anthropology","volume":" ","pages":"61-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2023.2276708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing on sources relating to the Brazilian scenario - from ethnographic research in lower-income neighorhoods to the analysis of official documents and public debates - we build on cases of forced child removals to explore the intersectional dynamics of class, race, and gender that underlie institutionalized practices of discrimination against poverty-stricken families. After first addressing the influence of recent global trends in child-protection policy, we observe how adoption procedures in Brazil have been increasingly facilitated by the resignification of rights and corresponding changes in the country's legal infrastructures. Next, asking what sort of authoritative knowledge is invoked to define a child's best interests, we reflect on the role played by biomedicine in appraising the limits of acceptable parenthood. Guided by the notion of stratified reproduction, our investigation of these political, scientific, and moral technologies suggests plausible connections between policies that condition the demand for and the supply of adoptable children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
界定可接受的亲子关系的限度:巴西的生殖治理。
根据与巴西情景有关的资料来源,从对低收入邻居的民族志研究到对官方文件和公开辩论的分析,我们以强迫儿童迁移的案例为基础,探索阶级、种族和性别的交叉动态,这些动态是歧视贫困家庭的制度化做法的基础。在首先讨论了最近全球儿童保护政策趋势的影响后,我们观察到巴西的收养程序是如何因权利的放弃和该国法律基础设施的相应变化而日益便利的。接下来,当被问及援引什么样的权威知识来定义孩子的最大利益时,我们反思生物医学在评估可接受的父母身份的局限性方面所起的作用。在分层生育概念的指导下,我们对这些政治、科学和道德技术的调查表明,决定可收养儿童需求和供应的政策之间存在着合理的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Medical Anthropology provides a global forum for scholarly articles on the social patterns of ill-health and disease transmission, and experiences of and knowledge about health, illness and wellbeing. These include the nature, organization and movement of peoples, technologies and treatments, and how inequalities pattern access to these. Articles published in the journal showcase the theoretical sophistication, methodological soundness and ethnographic richness of contemporary medical anthropology. Through the publication of empirical articles and editorials, we encourage our authors and readers to engage critically with the key debates of our time. Medical Anthropology invites manuscripts on a wide range of topics, reflecting the diversity and the expanding interests and concerns of researchers in the field.
期刊最新文献
Research, HIV/AIDS, and Turning Waria into a Key Population in Indonesia: An Ethnographic Oral History. "Canary in the Coal Mine": Hope and Emergency in the Management of Measles. Travelling Thai Surrogate Mothers: Required and Restricted Mobility in Transnational Surrogacy. Bureaucracy and Surveillance-Care: The Partograph in Tanzanian Maternity Care. Making Sure She Eats Right: Absent-Presence, Articulation, and Surveillance-Care in Senegalese Men's Maternal Support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1