Long-term oncologic outcomes of postoperative adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer: Systemic review and meta-analysis of 5-year and 10-year follow-up data.
{"title":"Long-term oncologic outcomes of postoperative adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer: Systemic review and meta-analysis of 5-year and 10-year follow-up data.","authors":"Ja Yoon Ku, Chan Ho Lee, Hong Koo Ha","doi":"10.4111/kju.2015.56.11.735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the oncologic outcomes between adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer or with adverse pathologic factors including positive surgical margin and high Gleason score.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched the literature published from January 2000 until December 2014 at MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, and Cochrane Library. To be specific, included were studies comparing ART and SRT settings if they followed up oncologic outcomes more than 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3 retrospective, nonrandomized, observational studies, 1 matched control analysis, and 3 prospective randomized controlled studies met our inclusion criteria including a total of 2,380 patients (1,192 ART vs. 1,188 SRT). Higher favorable results were found in ART than in SRT was seen in the 5-year and 10-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (risk ratio [RR], 0.61 and 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.69 and 0.63-0.76). ART had a significantly higher 5-year progression-free survival rate than that in SRT (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51-0.80), but this was not the same for the 10-year progression-free survival rate (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.72-1.08). There was no significant difference for the 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates between ART and SRT (RR, 0.80 and 0.94; 95% CI, 0.59-1.07 and 0.80-1.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ART showed favorable results in BCR-free survival during the 5-year follow-up period. However, the 10-year progression-free survival and overall survival did not show any difference between ART and SRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":101367,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of urology","volume":"56 11","pages":"735-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4111/kju.2015.56.11.735","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.11.735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes between adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer or with adverse pathologic factors including positive surgical margin and high Gleason score.
Materials and methods: We searched the literature published from January 2000 until December 2014 at MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, and Cochrane Library. To be specific, included were studies comparing ART and SRT settings if they followed up oncologic outcomes more than 5 years.
Results: Overall, 3 retrospective, nonrandomized, observational studies, 1 matched control analysis, and 3 prospective randomized controlled studies met our inclusion criteria including a total of 2,380 patients (1,192 ART vs. 1,188 SRT). Higher favorable results were found in ART than in SRT was seen in the 5-year and 10-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (risk ratio [RR], 0.61 and 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.69 and 0.63-0.76). ART had a significantly higher 5-year progression-free survival rate than that in SRT (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51-0.80), but this was not the same for the 10-year progression-free survival rate (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.72-1.08). There was no significant difference for the 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates between ART and SRT (RR, 0.80 and 0.94; 95% CI, 0.59-1.07 and 0.80-1.11).
Conclusions: ART showed favorable results in BCR-free survival during the 5-year follow-up period. However, the 10-year progression-free survival and overall survival did not show any difference between ART and SRT.
目的:评估局部晚期前列腺癌癌症或伴有包括手术切缘阳性和高格里森评分在内的不良病理因素的患者辅助放射治疗(ART)和挽救性放射治疗(SRT)的肿瘤结果。材料和方法:我们检索了2000年1月至2014年12月在MEDLINE、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、ProQuest和Cochrane Library发表的文献。具体而言,包括比较ART和SRT设置的研究,如果他们随访肿瘤学结果超过5年。结果:总体而言,3项回顾性、非随机、观察性研究、1项匹配对照分析和3项前瞻性随机对照研究符合我们的纳入标准,包括2380名患者(1192名ART与1188名SRT)。ART的5年和10年无生化复发(BCR)生存率高于SRT(风险比[RR],0.61和0.70;95%置信区间[CI],0.54-0.69和0.63-0.76),但10年无进展生存率不相同(RR,0.88;95%CI,0.72-1.08)。ART和SRT之间的5年和10年总生存率没有显著差异(RR,0.80和0.94;95%CI,0.59-1.07和0.80-1.11)。结论:在5年随访期间,ART在无BCR生存方面显示出良好的结果。然而,ART和SRT之间的10年无进展生存率和总生存率没有任何差异。