Mandibular alveolar bone thickness in untreated Class I subjects with different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Joseph Formosa, Min Zou, Chun-Hsi Chung, Normand S Boucher, Chenshuang Li
{"title":"Mandibular alveolar bone thickness in untreated Class I subjects with different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.","authors":"Joseph Formosa, Min Zou, Chun-Hsi Chung, Normand S Boucher, Chenshuang Li","doi":"10.2319/030523-151.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the mandibular alveolar bone thickness in untreated skeletal Class I subjects with different vertical skeletal patterns.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 50 preorthodontic treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of a skeletal Class I Chinese population with near-normal occlusion were selected. The buccal and lingual alveolar bone thicknesses of mandibular canines to second molars were measured at 2 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), mid-root, and root apex levels. Differences in the measurements were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U-test. The correlation between alveolar bone thickness and the sella-nasion-mandibular plane (SN-MP) angle was calculated using Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Buccal alveolar bone was thinner on all mandibular canines to first molars but thicker on second molars in comparison with lingual alveolar bone. Buccal alveolar bone was within 1 mm at the levels of 2 mm below CEJ and mid-root for the canines and first premolars. Significant differences were detected among subjects with different vertical patterns, with a negative correlation between the SN-MP angle and alveolar thickness, especially in the canine and premolar regions. The thinnest buccal and lingual alveolar bone were detected in the high-angle group canine region (0.50 mm at the levels of 2 mm below CEJ and mid-root for the buccal side, 0.90 mm at the level of 2 mm below the CEJ for the lingual side).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To avoid periodontal complications, buccal-lingual movement of the mandibular canines and first premolars should be limited, especially in high-angle patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":"93 6","pages":"683-694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/030523-151.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the mandibular alveolar bone thickness in untreated skeletal Class I subjects with different vertical skeletal patterns.

Materials and methods: A total of 50 preorthodontic treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of a skeletal Class I Chinese population with near-normal occlusion were selected. The buccal and lingual alveolar bone thicknesses of mandibular canines to second molars were measured at 2 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), mid-root, and root apex levels. Differences in the measurements were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U-test. The correlation between alveolar bone thickness and the sella-nasion-mandibular plane (SN-MP) angle was calculated using Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression analysis.

Results: Buccal alveolar bone was thinner on all mandibular canines to first molars but thicker on second molars in comparison with lingual alveolar bone. Buccal alveolar bone was within 1 mm at the levels of 2 mm below CEJ and mid-root for the canines and first premolars. Significant differences were detected among subjects with different vertical patterns, with a negative correlation between the SN-MP angle and alveolar thickness, especially in the canine and premolar regions. The thinnest buccal and lingual alveolar bone were detected in the high-angle group canine region (0.50 mm at the levels of 2 mm below CEJ and mid-root for the buccal side, 0.90 mm at the level of 2 mm below the CEJ for the lingual side).

Conclusions: To avoid periodontal complications, buccal-lingual movement of the mandibular canines and first premolars should be limited, especially in high-angle patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有不同垂直骨骼模式的未经治疗的I类受试者的下颌牙槽骨厚度:锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
目的:评估不同垂直骨骼模式的未经治疗的I类骨骼受试者的下颌牙槽骨厚度。材料和方法:选择一个近正常咬合的骨骼I类中国人群,共50张牙前治疗锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像。下颌犬齿至第二磨牙的颊侧和舌侧牙槽骨厚度在牙骨质结合部(CEJ)、中根和根尖水平下方2mm处测量。使用Mann-Whitney U型检验分析测量结果的差异。采用Pearson相关系数和线性回归分析计算牙槽骨厚度与鞍鼻-下颌平面(SN-MP)角的相关性。结果:与舌侧牙槽骨相比,下颌第一磨牙和第二磨牙的颊牙槽骨较薄。犬齿和第一前磨牙的颊牙槽骨在CEJ和中根下方2mm的水平处在1mm以内。不同垂直模式的受试者之间存在显著差异,SN-MP角与肺泡厚度呈负相关,尤其是在犬齿和前臼齿区域。在高角度组犬区发现最薄的颊侧和舌侧牙槽骨(颊侧在CEJ和中根下方2 mm处为0.50 mm,舌侧在CEJ.下方2 mm的处为0.90 mm),尤其是在高角度患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eruptive path of maxillary canines in patients with lateral incisor agenesis: a longitudinal follow-up. Which orthodontic articles are accessed online the most? Exploring article usage metrics along with citations and altmetrics. Three-dimensional assessment of the nasopharyngeal airway in Down syndrome during the mixed dentition period: a case-control study. Efficacy of planned moderate to severe torque changes in mandibular central incisors with an initial series of Invisalign aligners: a retrospective cohort study. An in vitro study of a combined patient-specific device for safe and accurate insertion of infrazygomatic crest miniscrews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1