Root resorption during maxillary molar intrusion with clear aligners: a randomized controlled trial.

Wisama Withayanukonkij, Pannapat Chanmanee, Methee Promsawat, Smorntree Viteporn, Chidchanok Leethanakul
{"title":"Root resorption during maxillary molar intrusion with clear aligners: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Wisama Withayanukonkij, Pannapat Chanmanee, Methee Promsawat, Smorntree Viteporn, Chidchanok Leethanakul","doi":"10.2319/010723-14.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare changes in maxillary molar root resorption, intrusion amount, dentoskeletal measures, and maximum bite force (MBF) between clear aligners (CA) and fixed appliances with miniscrew (FM) during molar intrusion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty adults with anterior open bite were randomized into either CA or FM groups. Lateral cephalograms, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and MBF were collected at pretreatment (T0) and 6 months of treatment (T1). Maxillary molar intrusion in FM were intruded by nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed-coil spring delivered force (150 grams/side) while clear aligners combined with squeezing exercise were performed in CA. Parametric tests were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6 months of treatment, significant root resorption of 0.21-0.24 mm in CA and 0.38-0.47 mm in FM were found while maxillary molars were intruded 0.68 and 1.49 mm in CA and FM, respectively. CA showed significant less root resorption and intrusion than FM. Overbite, bite closing, and MBF increased significantly. CA showed significantly less overbite and SN-MP changes but more MBF increase than FM. MBF in CA was correlated with the amount of maxillary molar intrusion (r = 0.736, P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Maxillary molar intrusion and root resorption in CA were half the amount in FM in 6 months. The amount of maxillary molar root resorption was one-third of the intrusion distance. CA displayed less overbite increase and bite closing but more MBF increase than FM. MBF in CA was positively correlated with the molar intrusion amount.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":"93 6","pages":"629-637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/010723-14.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare changes in maxillary molar root resorption, intrusion amount, dentoskeletal measures, and maximum bite force (MBF) between clear aligners (CA) and fixed appliances with miniscrew (FM) during molar intrusion.

Materials and methods: Forty adults with anterior open bite were randomized into either CA or FM groups. Lateral cephalograms, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and MBF were collected at pretreatment (T0) and 6 months of treatment (T1). Maxillary molar intrusion in FM were intruded by nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed-coil spring delivered force (150 grams/side) while clear aligners combined with squeezing exercise were performed in CA. Parametric tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: After 6 months of treatment, significant root resorption of 0.21-0.24 mm in CA and 0.38-0.47 mm in FM were found while maxillary molars were intruded 0.68 and 1.49 mm in CA and FM, respectively. CA showed significant less root resorption and intrusion than FM. Overbite, bite closing, and MBF increased significantly. CA showed significantly less overbite and SN-MP changes but more MBF increase than FM. MBF in CA was correlated with the amount of maxillary molar intrusion (r = 0.736, P < .05).

Conclusions: Maxillary molar intrusion and root resorption in CA were half the amount in FM in 6 months. The amount of maxillary molar root resorption was one-third of the intrusion distance. CA displayed less overbite increase and bite closing but more MBF increase than FM. MBF in CA was positively correlated with the molar intrusion amount.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透明矫正器在上颌磨牙侵犯过程中的牙根吸收:一项随机对照试验。
目的:比较透明矫正器(CA)和带微型螺丝钉的固定矫治器(FM)在磨牙侵犯过程中上颌骨牙根吸收、侵犯量、牙骨骼测量和最大咬合力(MBF)的变化。材料和方法:将40例成人前部开放性咬合患者随机分为CA组或FM组。在预处理(T0)和治疗6个月(T1)时收集侧位头影、锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和MBF。镍钛(NiTi)闭合螺旋弹簧施加的力(150克/侧)侵入FM中的上颌磨牙,而在CA中进行透明矫正器结合挤压运动。参数测试用于统计分析。结果:治疗6个月后,CA和FM的牙根吸收显著,分别为0.21-0.24mm和0.38-0.47mm,上颌磨牙侵入分别为0.68和1.49mm。CA表现出明显少于FM的牙根吸收和侵入。过度咬合、咬合闭合和MBF显著增加。CA的上覆牙和SN-MP变化明显少于FM,但MBF增加更多。CA的MBF与上颌磨牙侵入量相关(r=0.736,P<.05)。结论:6个月内,CA的上颌磨牙侵入和牙根吸收量是FM的一半。上颌磨牙牙根吸收量为侵入距离的三分之一。与FM相比,CA表现出较少的覆牙增加和咬合闭合,但MBF增加较多。CA的MBF与磨牙侵入量呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eruptive path of maxillary canines in patients with lateral incisor agenesis: a longitudinal follow-up. Which orthodontic articles are accessed online the most? Exploring article usage metrics along with citations and altmetrics. Three-dimensional assessment of the nasopharyngeal airway in Down syndrome during the mixed dentition period: a case-control study. Efficacy of planned moderate to severe torque changes in mandibular central incisors with an initial series of Invisalign aligners: a retrospective cohort study. An in vitro study of a combined patient-specific device for safe and accurate insertion of infrazygomatic crest miniscrews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1