Non-barrier contraceptive use and relation to condom use behaviour by partner type among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India.

Elizabeth Reed, Jennifer Toller Erausquin, Monica Biradavolu, Argentina E Servin, Kim M Blankenship
{"title":"Non-barrier contraceptive use and relation to condom use behaviour by partner type among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India.","authors":"Elizabeth Reed,&nbsp;Jennifer Toller Erausquin,&nbsp;Monica Biradavolu,&nbsp;Argentina E Servin,&nbsp;Kim M Blankenship","doi":"10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study assessed non-barrier contraceptive use among female sex workers (FSW) in Andhra Pradesh, India and relation to inconsistent condom use among commercial and non-commercial male sexual partners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FSW at least 18 years of age (n=2338) were recruited through respondent-driven sampling for an HIV risk survey. Analysis was restricted to women of childbearing age (n=2197). Crude and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess non-barrier contraceptive use and relation to inconsistent condom use with husbands or regular male partners (i.e. non-clients), regular clients and occasional clients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-barrier methods of contraception included contraceptive pills (3.8%) and sterilisation (68.4%). In logistic regression models adjusted for relevant demographics, FSW using contraceptive pills were more likely to report inconsistent condom use with a regular client (past week) [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-4.0] and with an occasional client (past week) (AOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.6-5.3), as well as accepting more money for sex without a condom (past 30 days) (AOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-4.3). No significant associations were found between pill use and inconsistent condom use among women's non-client partners, potentially related to small sample sizes within these subgroups. Reporting sterilisation, which was more common among FSW who were older in age, was not associated with inconsistent condom use with client or non-client sexual partners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings document potential unmet need for modern, spacing contraceptives (i.e. pill, intrauterine device), but also indicate the importance for family planning services, particularly those promoting modern contraceptive methods to be provided alongside HIV prevention among FSW in Andhra Pradesh, India.</p>","PeriodicalId":101383,"journal":{"name":"The journal of family planning and reproductive health care","volume":"43 1","pages":"60-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100918","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of family planning and reproductive health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objective: The study assessed non-barrier contraceptive use among female sex workers (FSW) in Andhra Pradesh, India and relation to inconsistent condom use among commercial and non-commercial male sexual partners.

Methods: FSW at least 18 years of age (n=2338) were recruited through respondent-driven sampling for an HIV risk survey. Analysis was restricted to women of childbearing age (n=2197). Crude and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess non-barrier contraceptive use and relation to inconsistent condom use with husbands or regular male partners (i.e. non-clients), regular clients and occasional clients.

Results: Non-barrier methods of contraception included contraceptive pills (3.8%) and sterilisation (68.4%). In logistic regression models adjusted for relevant demographics, FSW using contraceptive pills were more likely to report inconsistent condom use with a regular client (past week) [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-4.0] and with an occasional client (past week) (AOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.6-5.3), as well as accepting more money for sex without a condom (past 30 days) (AOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-4.3). No significant associations were found between pill use and inconsistent condom use among women's non-client partners, potentially related to small sample sizes within these subgroups. Reporting sterilisation, which was more common among FSW who were older in age, was not associated with inconsistent condom use with client or non-client sexual partners.

Conclusions: Findings document potential unmet need for modern, spacing contraceptives (i.e. pill, intrauterine device), but also indicate the importance for family planning services, particularly those promoting modern contraceptive methods to be provided alongside HIV prevention among FSW in Andhra Pradesh, India.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度安得拉邦女性性工作者无障碍避孕药具的使用及其与伴侣类型安全套使用行为的关系。
目的:本研究评估了印度安得拉邦女性性工作者(FSW)使用无障碍避孕药具的情况,以及商业性和非商业性男性性伴侣不一致使用避孕套的关系。方法:FSW至少18 年龄为岁(n=2338)的受试者通过受试者驱动的抽样进行HIV风险调查。分析仅限于育龄妇女(n=2197)。使用粗略和调整后的逻辑回归模型来评估无障碍避孕药具的使用以及与丈夫或常规男性伴侣(即非客户)、常规客户和偶尔客户不一致使用避孕套的关系。结果:非障碍避孕方法包括避孕药(3.8%)和绝育(68.4%)。在根据相关人口统计学调整的逻辑回归模型中,使用避孕药的FSW更有可能报告与常规客户(过去一周)不一致的避孕套使用[调整后的比值比(AOR)2.2,95%置信区间(CI)1.2-4.0]和偶尔的客户(过去的一周)(AOR 2.6,95%CI 1.6-5.3),以及接受更多的不使用避孕套的性行为费用(过去30 天)(AOR2.5,95%CI1.5-4.3)。在女性非客户伴侣中,未发现药丸使用与避孕套使用不一致之间的显著关联,这可能与这些亚组中的小样本量有关。报告绝育在年龄较大的FSW中更为常见,与客户或非客户性伴侣不一致使用避孕套无关。结论:研究结果记录了对现代间隔避孕药具(即避孕药、宫内节育器)的潜在未满足需求,但也表明了计划生育服务的重要性,特别是那些在印度安得拉邦FSW中推广现代避孕方法和预防艾滋病毒的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-barrier contraceptive use and relation to condom use behaviour by partner type among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1